Question and answer
Operation Barbarossa was the Nazi German military invasion of A. China. B. France. C. U.S.S.R. D. Great Britain.
Question
Asked 4/2/2014 9:24:23 PM
Updated 4/2/2014 9:38:33 PM
1 Answer/Comment
This conversation has been flagged as incorrect.
Flagged by vchutkan [4/2/2014 9:38:33 PM]
Get an answer
Original conversation
User: Operation Barbarossa was the Nazi German military invasion of A. China. B. France. C. U.S.S.R. D. Great Britain.

Weegy: Operation Barbarossa was the Nazi German military invasion of B. France.
Expert answered|lixie007|Points 28|

Question
Asked 4/2/2014 9:24:23 PM
Updated 4/2/2014 9:38:33 PM
1 Answer/Comment
This conversation has been flagged as incorrect.
Flagged by vchutkan [4/2/2014 9:38:33 PM]
New answers
Rating
3
Operation Barbarossa was the Nazi German military invasion of the U.S.S.R.
Added 4/2/2014 9:38:30 PM
This answer has been confirmed as correct and helpful.
Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
Operation Barbarossa was the Nazi German military invasion of A. China. B. France. C. U.S.S.R. D. Great Britain.
Weegy: Operation Barbarossa was the Nazi German military invasion of C. U.S.S.R. (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Updated 4/2/2014 9:36:34 PM
0 Answers/Comments
32,212,031
questions answered
GET
Answers.
GET THE APP.
weegy*
*
Get answers from Weegy and a team of really smart live experts.
Popular Conversations
Reforestation always occurs as a result of human intervention. ...
Weegy: Reforestation always occurs as a result of human intervention.- is TRUE. User: The principal characteristic ...
9/13/2020 6:40:57 AM| 3 Answers
Medications such as. Weaken the immune system by damaging immune ...
Weegy: Medications such as chemotherapy drugs weaken the immune system by damaging immune cells. User: Sometimes ...
9/9/2020 6:13:15 PM| 3 Answers
A Supreme Court case in which minority rights were ignored was: a. ...
Weegy: A Supreme Court case in which minority rights were ignored was Korematsu v. United States.
9/18/2020 10:16:36 PM| 2 Answers
S
L
P
R
P
R
L
P
P
C
R
P
R
L
P
R
P
R
Points 1320 [Total 15075] Ratings 5 Comments 1250 Invitations 2 Offline
S
L
P
L
P
P
Points 1232 [Total 9332] Ratings 0 Comments 1232 Invitations 0 Offline
S
L
Points 774 [Total 1145] Ratings 0 Comments 774 Invitations 0 Offline
S
L
P
1
L
Points 743 [Total 5026] Ratings 8 Comments 663 Invitations 0 Online
S
L
P
P
P
1
P
L
Points 467 [Total 7918] Ratings 11 Comments 357 Invitations 0 Offline
S
L
Points 441 [Total 472] Ratings 0 Comments 1 Invitations 44 Offline
S
L
L
1
Points 400 [Total 6316] Ratings 6 Comments 340 Invitations 0 Offline
S
L
Points 265 [Total 265] Ratings 1 Comments 255 Invitations 0 Offline
S
L
Points 229 [Total 314] Ratings 1 Comments 219 Invitations 0 Offline
S
L
Points 219 [Total 2753] Ratings 3 Comments 189 Invitations 0 Offline
* Excludes moderators and previous
winners (Include)
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | © Purple Inc.