A well-tested explanation for a set of observations or experimental results is a A. law. B. rule. C. theory. D. hypothesis.

Question and answer

Question

Asked 6/6/2012 7:58:03 AM

Updated 6/6/2012 9:15:29 AM

3 Answers/Comments

This conversation has been flagged as incorrect.

Get an answer

Search for an answer or ask Weegy.

Original conversation

User: A well-tested explanation for a set of observations or experimental results is a A. law. B. rule. C. theory. D. hypothesis.

Weegy: D. hypothesis.
jeifunk|Points 3198|

Question

Asked 6/6/2012 7:58:03 AM

Updated 6/6/2012 9:15:29 AM

3 Answers/Comments

This conversation has been flagged as incorrect.

New answers

Rating

kidcarbon

A well-tested explanation for a set of observations or experimental results is a theory

Added 6/6/2012 8:05:54 AM

This answer has been confirmed as correct and helpful.

Confirmed by selymi [9/18/2015 5:40:42 AM]

Comments

kidcarbon

a hypothesis is an educated guess that needs to be tested

Added 6/6/2012 8:06:38 AM

Add an answer or comment

Questions asked by the same visitor

Today the value of money is based on A. the silver standard. B. the bartering system. C. the fiat money system. D. the gold standard.

Weegy: D. the gold standard. (More)

Question

Updated 5/8/2015 2:13:23 AM

1 Answer/Comment

jerry06

Today the value of money is based on the fiat money system.

Added 5/8/2015 2:13:22 AM

This answer has been confirmed as correct and helpful.

Confirmed by yumdrea [5/8/2015 2:24:38 AM]

If a singer's voice is just at the right pitch, he or she can cause a crystal glass to vibrate and shatter. This is due to A. refraction. B. diffraction. C. resonance. D. amplification.

Weegy: If a singer's voice is just at the right pitch, he or she can cause a crystal glass to vibrate and shatter. This is due to RESONANCE. (More)

Question

Expert Answered

Updated 8/3/2014 5:49:53 PM

0 Answers/Comments

What did the Supreme Court rule in the Plessy v. Ferguson case in 1896? A. The 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments were unconstitutional. B. Jim Crow Laws were unconstitutional. C. The doctrine of separate but equal was constitutional. D. The doctrine of separate but equal was unconstitutional.

Weegy: D. The doctrine of separate but equal was unconstitutional. (More)

Question

Updated 4/9/2016 12:34:02 PM

1 Answer/Comment

Janet17

In the Plessy v. Ferguson case in 1896, the Supreme Court ruled that: The doctrine of separate but equal was constitutional.

Added 4/9/2016 12:34:02 PM