Can you cross the line from image enhancement to image manipulation?
It depends on what you are trying to do. I am trying to share the beauty and wonder of the universe with others through my astrophotography. [ The question is more one of aesthetics than ethics for me because I am not formally trying to produce science with my images. My images do have documentary aspects however, so ethical considerations do come into play.
It's simple to me. The special qualities of long-exposure astrophotography allow the recording of objects and details that are mostly invisible to normal human vision. It is really out there in nature, we just can't see it. Some of
this detail is incredibly faint and low contrast. If I enhance this faint detail in the original image to make it more visible, or more aesthetically appealing, that is ethically acceptable to me.
If you add something that wasn't there in the original scene, you've crossed the line from a documentary art form into a fictional one. This may or may not be OK, depending on what your purpose is. If your purpose is to portray a scene as truthful, then it's not OK. If your purpose was to create fiction, or "art", then it is OK. You just have to be up front and tell the viewer what you are doing in either case. ]
Expert answered|
selymi|Points 10426|
Question
Asked 4/27/2013 8:58:54 AM
0 Answers/Comments
This answer has been confirmed as correct and helpful.
Rating
There are no new answers.