Question and answer
what should or should not be law? and what should be considered when creating a law?
Normative jurisprudence is essentially political philosophy, and asks "what should law be?", while analytic jurisprudence asks "what is law?". [ John Austin's utilitarian answer was that law is "commands, backed by threat of sanctions, from a sovereign, to whom people have a habit of obedience".[101] Natural lawyers on the other side, such as Jean-Jacques Rousseau, argue that law reflects
essentially moral and unchangeable laws of nature. The concept of "natural law" emerged in ancient Greek philosophy concurrently and in entanglement with the notion of justice, and re-entered the mainstream of Western culture through the writings of Thomas Aquinas. Hugo Grotius, the founder of a purely rationalistic system of natural law, argued that law arises from both a social impulse—as Aristotle had indicated—and reason.[102] Immanuel Kant believed a moral imperative requires laws "be chosen as though they should hold as universal laws of nature".[103] Jeremy Bentham and his student Austin, following David Hume, believed that this conflated the "is" and what "ought to be" problem. Bentham and Austin argued for law's positivism; that real law is entirely separate from "morality".[104] Kant was also criticised by Friedrich Nietzsche, who rejected the principle of equality, and believed that law emanates from the will to power, and cannot be labelled as "moral" or "immoral".[105][106][107] In 1934, the Austrian philosopher Hans Kelsen continued the positivist tradition in his book the Pure Theory of Law.[108] Kelsen believed that although law is separate from morality, it is endowed with "normativity"; meaning we ought to obey it. While laws are positive "is" statements (e.g. the fine for reversing on a highway is €500); law tells us what we "should" do. Thus, each legal system can be hypothesised to have a basic norm (Grundnorm) instructing us to obey. ]
Expert answered|jher000|Points 3393|
Question|Rated bad
Asked 6/30/2011 5:00:00 PM
0 Answers/Comments
Ask a question
Not a good answer? Get an answer now. (Free)
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
16,916,653 questions answered
Popular Conversations
Ad Hominem
Weegy: A) ad hominem arguments
7/22/2014 10:50:04 PM| 2 Answers
Nearly all standing committees have several
7/22/2014 1:25:29 AM| 1 Answers
what is Marginal analysis
Weegy: Marginal analysis is the process of identifying the benefits and costs of different alternatives by examining ...
7/22/2014 1:25:47 AM| 1 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
R
L
1
1
P
C
1
P
1
1
L
P
C
P
C
1
P
C
L
P
C
1
P
C
Points 1754 [Total 20754]| Ratings 1| Comments 1744| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
P
C
P
C
1
L
P
C
L
P
C
P
C
P
C
Points 1712 [Total 16841]| Ratings 0| Comments 1712| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
P
C
L
P
C
P
C
L
P
C
P
C
Points 1396 [Total 13951]| Ratings 1| Comments 1386| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
1
Points 1326 [Total 3510]| Ratings 2| Comments 1306| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
1
1
1
1
L
1
Points 1021 [Total 7198]| Ratings 2| Comments 1001| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
Points 868 [Total 3004]| Ratings 4| Comments 828| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
1
L
P
P
L
Points 800 [Total 10408]| Ratings 0| Comments 800| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
Points 708 [Total 4384]| Ratings 2| Comments 688| Invitations 0|Offline
S
P
C
L
P
L
1
Points 685 [Total 5739]| Ratings 4| Comments 645| Invitations 0|Online
S
Points 247 [Total 395]| Ratings 2| Comments 227| Invitations 0|Offline
Home | Contact | Archive | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2014 Purple Inc.