You have new items in your feed. Click to view.
Question and answer
How do you explain what Rutherford would have seen in his gold foil experiment if Thomson's plum pudding model was completely accurate
The results of this experiment gave Rutherford the means to arrive at two conclusions: one, an atom was much more than just empty space and scattered electrons (J.J. [ Thomson model argued), and two, an atom must have a positively charged center that contains most of its mass (which Rutherford termed as the nucleus). Since alpha particles are relatively heavy, positively charged particles, the
fact that the occasional particle would be deflected by either a small or large margin proved that a portion of an atom was both positively charged (particles of identical charges repel one another while particles of opposite charges attract one another) and relatively heavy by atomic standards. Since only a small number of alpha particles veered slightly when passed through the foil and since even fewer bounced back at the experiment, Rutherford reasoned that this positively charged center was relatively small in reference to the total size of the atom. Therefore J.J. Thompson was slightly correct in his assumption that atoms are primarily composed of empty space.With the disproof of the plum pudding model and with Rutherford's discovery of an atom's nucleus, it was now possible for Neils Bohr to construct his model of an atom's structure. Bohr conversed with Rutherford on several occasions and was able to use the knowledge he gained from the encounters to create what is now called the quantum mechanical model of an atom. To explain briefly, Bohr described the hydrogen atom as a nucleus with an electron circling around it, much as a planet orbits the sun. The problem with Bohr's model is that it only works soundly for the hydrogen atom (this and other facts about Bohr's research and the quantum mechanical model can be found here). Even though Bohr's model was not entirely correct in its application, the point to grab here is that Rutherford's experiment with gold foil and his discovery of the nucleus had a huge contribution to the development of today's atomic theory(s). ]
Expert answered|selymi|Points 4422|
Asked 7/5/2011 9:42:10 AM
0 Answers/Comments
Get an answer
New answers

There are no new answers.


There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
26,326,312 questions answered
Popular Conversations
A common reason for conflict within Europe in the 1700s was A. the ...
Weegy: Seven Years' War was NOT a part of the Thirty Years' World War. User: Why was the rock of Gibraltar an ...
10/19/2016 6:44:57 AM| 2 Answers
War and military build-up help the economy of a country by ...
Weegy: War and military build-up help the economy of a country by lowering: unemployment. User: The Japanese ...
10/19/2016 8:05:40 AM| 2 Answers
How did some U.S. citizens oppose the Vietnam war? Many left the ...
Weegy: Opposition to the war arose during a time of unprecedented student activism reinforced in numbers by the ...
10/19/2016 9:54:46 AM| 2 Answers
What decimal is written in words “five and four hundred sixty-seven ...
Weegy: What decimal is written in words five and four hundred sixty-seven ten thousandths it is A User: Write 0.0155 ...
10/19/2016 1:52:00 AM| 1 Answers
3/8 as a decimal User: What decimal is written in words “forty-six ...
Weegy: Forty-six and seven thousandths in decimal is: 46.0007 User: A butcher has 66 pounds of meat. He wants to ...
10/19/2016 1:59:48 AM| 1 Answers
Which of the following is something you can do to protect yourself ...
Weegy: Use wooden structures to support the sides of an excavation.
10/19/2016 5:05:23 AM| 1 Answers
The 1986 explosion at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant in ...
Weegy: The 1986 explosion at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant in Ukraine caused a serious environmental problem. ...
10/19/2016 5:49:16 AM| 1 Answers
Weegy Stuff
Points 441 [Total 2162] Ratings 7 Comments 371 Invitations 0 Offline
Points 282 [Total 799] Ratings 0 Comments 282 Invitations 0 Offline
Points 85 [Total 1432] Ratings 0 Comments 85 Invitations 0 Offline
Points 25 [Total 25] Ratings 0 Comments 25 Invitations 0 Offline
Points 24 [Total 1342] Ratings 1 Comments 4 Invitations 1 Offline
Points 10 [Total 10] Ratings 1 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Offline
Points 10 [Total 10] Ratings 1 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Online
Points 6 [Total 111] Ratings 0 Comments 6 Invitations 0 Offline
Points 2 [Total 2] Ratings 0 Comments 2 Invitations 0 Offline
Points 1 [Total 1771] Ratings 0 Comments 1 Invitations 0 Offline
* Excludes moderators and previous
winners (Include)
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | © Purple Inc.