Notice: Payments for answers will end 4/10/2017. Click for more info.
You have new items in your feed. Click to view.
Question and answer
Q: How would you convince your employees that working less hours, not more, is more beneficial for them and the company?
A: Let's say that over a fifteen year period a typical company can produce in 30,000 hours what it originally produced in 40,000 hours. [ This productivity increase could be used to cut the workweek from 40 to 30 hours without a cut in pay, and the reduction in hours would enable us to maintain the same number of jobs. Of course, in this example the company is giving the full benefit of the
productivity increase to the employees; no additional profits are realized, so there will be no incentive to bring about increases in productivity. The benefits could be shared, however, by giving the workers a smaller cut in hours.1 The idea of reducing hours is not unrealistic, for in the first half of this century productivity increases were used to reduce the workweek from 60 to 40 hours while increasing total pay. Since World War II, the workweek has remained relatively constant, and productivity increases have been used almost entirely to increase total production and total pay. But environmental progress, by allowing us to live cheaper and better, could enable us to use productivity increases to once again cut the workweek without a cut in pay. There are two issues that must be addressed before continuing: workers' gains from productivity increases, and fringe benefits. People often ask, Why should businesses share productivity gains with workers? The mere fact that this question is posed shows that we have lost sight of a very basic concept, namely, that in an industrialized economy, the general population expects to be better off over time. Indeed, if workers never enjoyed gains from productivity increases, we would still be working sixty-hour weeks. Over the past twenty years, the benefits of productivity increases have gone more to stockholders than to workers, but this must be seen as an aberration. ]
Expert answered|selymi|Points 4979|
Question|Rated bad
Asked 7/23/2011 11:35:43 PM
0 Answers/Comments
Get an answer
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
26,439,313 questions answered
Popular Conversations
What is the solution to the proportion? n/18 = 5/9 A. n = 2.5 B. n ...
Weegy: n/18 = 5/9; 9n = 5 * 18 9n = 90 n = 90/9 n = 10
10/12/2017 10:59:55 AM| 8 Answers
Which of the following has kinetic energy? a. a rock poised for a ...
Weegy: A bow that is drawn back by an archer. B. Has kinetic energy.
10/10/2017 2:00:05 PM| 3 Answers
What does everyone have planned for today " What type of sentence is ...
Weegy: "I think it would be best to study the problem carefully." The purpose of the above sentence is: It makes a ...
10/8/2017 2:18:49 PM| 2 Answers
What type of sentence tends to express a strong emotion? A. ...
Weegy: Do your work! The sentence is imperative. User: Which of the following pairs of words are homophones? ...
10/8/2017 2:25:51 PM| 2 Answers
_______ are words that are spelled alike, but have different ...
Weegy: "Near the computer" is a prepositional phrase. User: In which sentence is a homophone used correctly? ...
10/8/2017 2:29:20 PM| 2 Answers
In which one of the following sentences is a word misspelled? ...
Weegy: The sentence with a spelling mistake is: User: Which of the following is an example of an imperative sentence? ...
10/9/2017 8:45:54 AM| 2 Answers
Which of the following about the double-exposition concerto form is ...
Weegy: The development avoids the tonic is TRUE about the double-exposition concerto form. User: The first section ...
10/9/2017 11:33:19 AM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
P
P
L
P
P
P
Points 137 [Total 2029] Ratings 11 Comments 27 Invitations 0 Online
S
P
L
Points 97 [Total 119] Ratings 0 Comments 97 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 63 [Total 63] Ratings 4 Comments 23 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 2 [Total 2] Ratings 0 Comments 2 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 2 [Total 2] Ratings 0 Comments 2 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 2 [Total 2] Ratings 0 Comments 2 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 1 [Total 1] Ratings 0 Comments 1 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 1 [Total 1] Ratings 0 Comments 1 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 1 [Total 1] Ratings 0 Comments 1 Invitations 0 Offline
S
L
Points 1 [Total 100] Ratings 0 Comments 1 Invitations 0 Offline
* Excludes moderators and previous
winners (Include)
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | © Purple Inc.