Notice: Payments for answers will end 4/10/2017. Click for more info.
You have new items in your feed. Click to view.
Question and answer
Q: In your opinion, what differentiates a strong cause-and-effect essay from a weak one? Explain your answer.
A: Welcome to the Purdue OWL This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue ( [ When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice at bottom. Contributors:Stacy Weida, Karl Stolley. Summary: These OWL resources will help you develop and refine the arguments in your writing. Developing Strong Thesis Statements The thesis statement or main claim must be debatable An
argumentative or persuasive piece of writing must begin with a debatable thesis or claim. In other words, the thesis must be something that people could reasonably have differing opinions on. If your thesis is something that is generally agreed upon or accepted as fact then there is no reason to try to persuade people. Example of a non-debatable thesis statement: Pollution is bad for the environment. This thesis statement is not debatable. First, the word pollution means that something is bad or negative in some way. Further, all studies agree that pollution is a problem, they simply disagree on the impact it will have or the scope of the problem. No one could reasonably argue that pollution is good. Example of a debatable thesis statement: At least twenty-five percent of the federal budget should be spent on limiting pollution. This is an example of a debatable thesis because reasonable people could disagree with it. Some people might think that this is how we should spend the nation's money. Others might feel that we should be spending more money on education. Still others could argue that corporations, not the government, should be paying to limit pollution. Another example of a debatable thesis statement: America's anti-pollution efforts should focus on privately owned cars. In this example there is also room for disagreement between rational individuals. Some citizens might think focusing on recycling programs rather than private automobiles is the most effective strategy. The thesis needs to be narrow Although the scope of your paper might seem overwhelming at the start, generally the narrower the thesis the more effective your argument will be. ]
Get an answer
Original conversation
User: In your opinion, what differentiates a strong cause-and-effect essay from a weak one? Explain your answer.

Weegy: Welcome to the Purdue OWL This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue ( [ When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice at bottom. Contributors:Stacy Weida, Karl Stolley. Summary: These OWL resources will help you develop and refine the arguments in your writing. Developing Strong Thesis Statements The thesis statement or main claim must be debatable An argumentative or persuasive piece of writing must begin with a debatable thesis or claim. In other words, the thesis must be something that people could reasonably have differing opinions on. If your thesis is something that is generally agreed upon or accepted as fact then there is no reason to try to persuade people. Example of a non-debatable thesis statement: Pollution is bad for the environment. This thesis statement is not debatable. First, the word pollution means that something is bad or negative in some way. Further, all studies agree that pollution is a problem, they simply disagree on the impact it will have or the scope of the problem. No one could reasonably argue that pollution is good. Example of a debatable thesis statement: At least twenty-five percent of the federal budget should be spent on limiting pollution. This is an example of a debatable thesis because reasonable people could disagree with it. Some people might think that this is how we should spend the nation's money. Others might feel that we should be spending more money on education. Still others could argue that corporations, not the government, should be paying to limit pollution. Another example of a debatable thesis statement: America's anti-pollution efforts should focus on privately owned cars. In this example there is also room for disagreement between rational individuals. Some citizens might think focusing on recycling programs rather than private automobiles is the most effective strategy. The thesis needs to be narrow Although the scope of your paper might seem overwhelming at the start, generally the narrower the thesis the more effective your argument will be. ]
cadbury19020|Points 93|

User: In your opinion, what differentiates a strong cause-and-effect essay from a weak one?

Weegy: Welcome to the Purdue OWL This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue ( [ When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice at bottom. Contributors:Stacy Weida, Karl Stolley. Summary: These OWL resources will help you develop and refine the arguments in your writing. Developing Strong Thesis Statements The thesis statement or main claim must be debatable An argumentative or persuasive piece of writing must begin with a debatable thesis or claim. In other words, the thesis must be something that people could reasonably have differing opinions on. If your thesis is something that is generally agreed upon or accepted as fact then there is no reason to try to persuade people. Example of a non-debatable thesis statement: Pollution is bad for the environment. This thesis statement is not debatable. First, the word pollution means that something is bad or negative in some way. Further, all studies agree that pollution is a problem, they simply disagree on the impact it will have or the scope of the problem. No one could reasonably argue that pollution is good. Example of a debatable thesis statement: At least twenty-five percent of the federal budget should be spent on limiting pollution. This is an example of a debatable thesis because reasonable people could disagree with it. Some people might think that this is how we should spend the nation's money. Others might feel that we should be spending more money on education. Still others could argue that corporations, not the government, should be paying to limit pollution. Another example of a debatable thesis statement: America's anti-pollution efforts should focus on privately owned cars. In this example there is also room for disagreement between rational individuals. Some citizens might think focusing on recycling programs rather than private automobiles is the most effective strategy. The thesis needs to be narrow Although the scope of your paper might seem overwhelming at the start, generally the narrower the thesis the more effective your argument will be. ]
cadbury19020|Points 93|

Question
Asked 9/19/2013 2:18:34 AM
0 Answers/Comments
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
26,640,063 questions answered
Popular Conversations
Suppose the U.S. can produce cars for a lower opportunity cost than ...
Weegy: Suppose the U.S. can produce cars for a lower opportunity cost than Japan while Japan has a comparative ...
2/13/2018 7:30:37 PM| 4 Answers
What's the simplified form of 2x + 3 x + 5? A. x 8 B. ...
Weegy: (2x^2)(3x^2) = 6x4 User: Simplify this expression: 13 + (–12) – (–5) = ? A. –6 B. 6 C. –30 ...
2/12/2018 11:53:02 PM| 3 Answers
Solve this equation: 80 = 3y + 2y + 4 + 1. A. y = 1/5 B. ...
Weegy: 80 = 3y + 2y + 4 + 1 80 = 5y + 5 80 - 5 = 5y -5y = -75 y = 15 User: Solve the inequality: 12p + 7 > 139 ...
2/14/2018 2:20:46 PM| 3 Answers
Solve the equation: 12y = 132. A. y = 11 B. y = 144 ...
Weegy: 12y = 132 User: Solve this equation: 2s + s + 12 = 132. A. s = 40 B. s = –30 C. s = 9 D. ...
2/14/2018 2:32:47 PM| 3 Answers
Write 10 5/12 as an equivalent improper fraction.
Weegy: 10 5/12 in improper fraction form is 125/12. User: Subtract: 8 – 4 1/2
2/15/2018 12:27:39 AM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
Points 344 [Total 347] Ratings 10 Comments 214 Invitations 3 Offline
S
Points 89 [Total 89] Ratings 0 Comments 19 Invitations 7 Offline
S
P
Points 41 [Total 85] Ratings 1 Comments 31 Invitations 0 Offline
S
P
L
P
P
Points 39 [Total 232] Ratings 0 Comments 39 Invitations 0 Offline
S
1
L
L
P
R
P
L
P
P
R
Points 28 [Total 12639] Ratings 0 Comments 28 Invitations 0 Online
S
Points 20 [Total 20] Ratings 2 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Offline
S
P
Points 13 [Total 30] Ratings 0 Comments 13 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 11 [Total 11] Ratings 1 Comments 1 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 10 [Total 10] Ratings 0 Comments 0 Invitations 1 Offline
S
Points 5 [Total 5] Ratings 0 Comments 5 Invitations 0 Offline
* Excludes moderators and previous
winners (Include)
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | © Purple Inc.