Question and answer
The view that judicial decisions should rest on the intent of the framers of the Constitution is known as
The view that judicial decisions should rest on the intent of the framers of the Constitution is known as .The Framers of the American Constitution were visionaries. They designed our Constitution to endure. [ They sought not only to address the specific challenges facing the nation during their lifetimes, but to establish the foundational principles that would sustain and guide the new nation
into an uncertain future. The text of the Constitution reflects this vision. It defines our most fundamental freedoms in general terms: “freedom of speech,” “due process of law,” “free exercise” of religion, “equal protection of the laws,” “cruel and unusual punishment.” The Constitution sets forth governmental powers in similarly general terms: Congress may regulate “commerce… among the several states,” the president will “take care that the laws be faithfully executed,” the courts are authorized to decide “cases” and “controversies.” These phrases are not self-defining. The Framers understood that they were entrusting to future generations the responsibility to draw upon their intelligence, judgment, and experience to give concrete meaning to these broad principles over time. As Chief Justice John Marshall observed almost two centuries ago, “we must never forget it is a Constitution we are expounding…intended to endure for ages to come, and consequently to be adapted to the various crises of human affairs.” ]
Expert answered|cadbury19020|Points 123|
Question
Asked 10/17/2013 6:29:13 PM
0 Answers/Comments
Get an answer
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
Judicial objectivism.
Weegy: My proposed principle of "judicial objectivism" is that judges should try to avoid basing decisions on their own biased personal opinions and should try to use reasoning that is so airtight that no reasonable person could find fault with it. [ I call it "judicial objectivism" to distinguish it from the general philosophy of "objectivism" and the "objectivism" of Ayn Rand in particular, though my "judicial objectivism" is related to those other philosophies' idea that there are truths or realities that are independent of individual perceptions. IMO the principle of "judicial independence" is actually harmful when it encourages - as it did in the case of Judge "Jackass" Jones - judges to base their decisions on their own biased personal opinions. Judges should have the humility to recognize that their personal opinions, even if valid, might be in disagreement with one or more other valid opinions. This proposed principle of "judicial objectivism" - like my proposed principles of "non-justiciability" and the "compelling reason" test for non-literal interpretations of the Constitution - is aimed at eliminating or reducing the courts' arbitrariness, capriciousness, "activism," and "legislating from the bench." ] (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 10/17/2013 6:27:51 PM
0 Answers/Comments
17,919,857 questions answered
Popular Conversations
what is micro
Weegy: A microorganism is a microscopic organism, which may be a single cell or multicellular organism. User: what ...
10/21/2014 7:38:45 PM| 3 Answers
Solve the inequality. 2(4 + x) > 4(x + 4) A. x > 4 B. x > ...
Weegy: 2w + 3 > 14; 2w > 14 - 3; 2w > 11; w > 11/2 User: Solve the inequality. 5a + 12 6 B. a < 6 C. D.
10/21/2014 12:59:56 PM| 3 Answers
Anime
10/21/2014 9:41:19 AM| 2 Answers
what are quadratic equations
Weegy: You can apply quadratic equation to cook marshmallows by following these steps: 1. Select a quadratic ...
10/21/2014 10:48:49 AM| 2 Answers
What is the solution set of 2x ^2 - 3x = 5?
10/21/2014 11:05:05 AM| 2 Answers
Simplify -(-2a + 13) + (-9a - 2) - (-7a - 3).
Weegy: -(-2a + 13) + (-9a - 2) - (-7a - 3) = (-7a - 15) - (-7a - 3) = -12
10/21/2014 11:12:50 AM| 2 Answers
Determine the solution set of (x + 1)2 = 25. {-8, 6} {-8, ...
Weegy: The answer is 77,520. There are 77,520 possible committees that can be formed.
10/21/2014 11:18:30 AM| 2 Answers
Simplify (x - y + 1) - (x + y - 1).
Weegy: (x - 4)(x + 3) = x^2 + 3x - 4x - 12 = x^2 - x - 12
10/21/2014 11:19:54 AM| 2 Answers
Solve the inequality 4x User: x + 1/2 < 1/4
10/21/2014 11:27:18 AM| 2 Answers
Simplify p(p - q) - q(q - p).
Weegy: 3 - (2 - 8) = 3 - (-6) = 3 + 6; = 9
10/21/2014 11:46:35 AM| 2 Answers
Social welfare User: stigma
10/21/2014 12:28:06 PM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
1
1
1
1
L
1
L
Points 2267 [Total 14642]| Ratings 0| Comments 2267| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
1
L
P
C
1
P
C
1
L
Points 1464 [Total 10945]| Ratings 3| Comments 1434| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
1
L
P
P
L
Points 781 [Total 13010]| Ratings 0| Comments 781| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 487 [Total 1886]| Ratings 0| Comments 487| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 479 [Total 479]| Ratings 0| Comments 449| Invitations 3|Offline
S
1
L
L
Points 474 [Total 6268]| Ratings 3| Comments 444| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 352 [Total 353]| Ratings 4| Comments 312| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 207 [Total 207]| Ratings 1| Comments 197| Invitations 0|Offline
S
P
C
L
P
L
1
Points 48 [Total 6282]| Ratings 0| Comments 48| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 27 [Total 27]| Ratings 0| Comments 27| Invitations 0|Offline
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2014 Purple Inc.