Question and answer
How does the corporatization of farming affect all Americans, not just those living in rural areas?
Farmers freely chose to adopt the new mechanical and chemical technologies, many of which were developed through publicly supported research, because they seemed to promise increased profits. [ These technologies invariably promised greater production efficiency, which would reduce cost per unit of production, leaving the farmer with a wider profit margin. Increased efficiency generally meant
that each farmer could produce more than before, in fact, needed to produce more to justify the new technological investment and to realize the full benefit of the new technology. However, the "early adopters" were the only farmers to realize increased profits. As more and more farmers adopted a new technology, a new kind of machine or agri-chemical, total production invariably increased, because each farmer now was compelled to produce more. The new technologies allowed farmers to reduce costs per unit, but only if they produced more units. With increased production, market prices invariably fell, leaving even the innovators no better off than before. The later adopters rarely had a chance to recoup their investment before prices fell and profits were gone. In cases where the government supported commodity prices, land prices rose instead, with the same net effect on profits. Eventually, technological adoption was motivated by survival rather than profits, and those farmers who adopted too late didn't survive. Some farmers had to fail so others could expand-could farm more land or produce more livestock-in order to realize the full benefits of the new technologies. In fact, prices invariably stayed low enough long enough to force enough farmers out of business to accommodate the new industrial technologies. And, after each "technological adjustment" was complete, there was always another round of technology waiting for adoption. Chronic crisis and continuing farm failures have been a necessary consequence of agricultural industrialization. ]
Expert answered|Marvel2|Points 1062|
Question
Asked 8/8/2013 11:55:03 AM
0 Answers/Comments
Get an answer
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
How does the corporatization of farming affect all Americans, not just those living in rural areas?
Weegy: Farmers freely chose to adopt the new mechanical and chemical technologies, many of which were developed through publicly supported research, because they seemed to promise increased profits. [ These technologies invariably promised greater production efficiency, which would reduce cost per unit of production, leaving the farmer with a wider profit margin. Increased efficiency generally meant that each farmer could produce more than before, in fact, needed to produce more to justify the new technological investment and to realize the full benefit of the new technology. However, the "early adopters" were the only farmers to realize increased profits. As more and more farmers adopted a new technology, a new kind of machine or agri-chemical, total production invariably increased, because each farmer now was compelled to produce more. The new technologies allowed farmers to reduce costs per unit, but only if they produced more units. With increased production, market prices invariably fell, leaving even the innovators no better off than before. The later adopters rarely had a chance to recoup their investment before prices fell and profits were gone. In cases where the government supported commodity prices, land prices rose instead, with the same net effect on profits. Eventually, technological adoption was motivated by survival rather than profits, and those farmers who adopted too late didn't survive. Some farmers had to fail so others could expand-could farm more land or produce more livestock-in order to realize the full benefits of the new technologies. In fact, prices invariably stayed low enough long enough to force enough farmers out of business to accommodate the new industrial technologies. And, after each "technological adjustment" was complete, there was always another round of technology waiting for adoption. Chronic crisis and continuing farm failures have been a necessary consequence of agricultural industrialization. ] User: What is brain ... (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 8/8/2013 12:42:24 PM
0 Answers/Comments
19,238,901 questions answered
Popular Conversations
The slope of the line passing through the points (-1, 5) and (3, 5) ...
Weegy: (-1) * 5 = -5 User: what is the slope of the line passing thru (0,4) and (-8,-1) User: What is the slope of ...
1/29/2015 4:21:11 AM| 2 Answers
true or false. A pronoun is a noun substitute.
Weegy: They is a pronoun. User: true or false. A noun indicates the action in a sentence.
1/29/2015 8:22:51 AM| 2 Answers
Select the correctly written sentence in this group. a. Without a ...
Weegy: The correct sentence is: Without a plan for the weekend, we decided to take in a Saturday matinee. User: ...
1/29/2015 4:16:00 PM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
Points 2065 [Total 2086]| Ratings 0| Comments 2065| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
P
L
P
Points 1370 [Total 6647]| Ratings 0| Comments 1370| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
1
L
P
P
L
P
P
Points 716 [Total 15727]| Ratings 1| Comments 706| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 438 [Total 1119]| Ratings 2| Comments 418| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
L
Points 303 [Total 7003]| Ratings 1| Comments 293| Invitations 0|Online
S
Points 121 [Total 136]| Ratings 1| Comments 111| Invitations 0|Offline
S
P
C
L
P
L
1
Points 92 [Total 6680]| Ratings 1| Comments 82| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 83 [Total 1644]| Ratings 0| Comments 83| Invitations 0|Online
S
Points 63 [Total 445]| Ratings 0| Comments 63| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 50 [Total 52]| Ratings 0| Comments 0| Invitations 5|Offline
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2014 Purple Inc.