You have new items in your feed. Click to view.
Question and answer
How does the corporatization of farming affect all Americans, not just those living in rural areas?
Farmers freely chose to adopt the new mechanical and chemical technologies, many of which were developed through publicly supported research, because they seemed to promise increased profits. [ These technologies invariably promised greater production efficiency, which would reduce cost per unit of production, leaving the farmer with a wider profit margin. Increased efficiency generally meant
that each farmer could produce more than before, in fact, needed to produce more to justify the new technological investment and to realize the full benefit of the new technology. However, the "early adopters" were the only farmers to realize increased profits. As more and more farmers adopted a new technology, a new kind of machine or agri-chemical, total production invariably increased, because each farmer now was compelled to produce more. The new technologies allowed farmers to reduce costs per unit, but only if they produced more units. With increased production, market prices invariably fell, leaving even the innovators no better off than before. The later adopters rarely had a chance to recoup their investment before prices fell and profits were gone. In cases where the government supported commodity prices, land prices rose instead, with the same net effect on profits. Eventually, technological adoption was motivated by survival rather than profits, and those farmers who adopted too late didn't survive. Some farmers had to fail so others could expand-could farm more land or produce more livestock-in order to realize the full benefits of the new technologies. In fact, prices invariably stayed low enough long enough to force enough farmers out of business to accommodate the new industrial technologies. And, after each "technological adjustment" was complete, there was always another round of technology waiting for adoption. Chronic crisis and continuing farm failures have been a necessary consequence of agricultural industrialization. ]
Expert answered|Marvel2|Points 1062|
Question
Asked 8/8/2013 11:55:03 AM
0 Answers/Comments
Get an answer
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
How does the corporatization of farming affect all Americans, not just those living in rural areas?
Weegy: Farmers freely chose to adopt the new mechanical and chemical technologies, many of which were developed through publicly supported research, because they seemed to promise increased profits. [ These technologies invariably promised greater production efficiency, which would reduce cost per unit of production, leaving the farmer with a wider profit margin. Increased efficiency generally meant that each farmer could produce more than before, in fact, needed to produce more to justify the new technological investment and to realize the full benefit of the new technology. However, the "early adopters" were the only farmers to realize increased profits. As more and more farmers adopted a new technology, a new kind of machine or agri-chemical, total production invariably increased, because each farmer now was compelled to produce more. The new technologies allowed farmers to reduce costs per unit, but only if they produced more units. With increased production, market prices invariably fell, leaving even the innovators no better off than before. The later adopters rarely had a chance to recoup their investment before prices fell and profits were gone. In cases where the government supported commodity prices, land prices rose instead, with the same net effect on profits. Eventually, technological adoption was motivated by survival rather than profits, and those farmers who adopted too late didn't survive. Some farmers had to fail so others could expand-could farm more land or produce more livestock-in order to realize the full benefits of the new technologies. In fact, prices invariably stayed low enough long enough to force enough farmers out of business to accommodate the new industrial technologies. And, after each "technological adjustment" was complete, there was always another round of technology waiting for adoption. Chronic crisis and continuing farm failures have been a necessary consequence of agricultural industrialization. ] User: What is brain ... (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 8/8/2013 12:42:24 PM
0 Answers/Comments
26,191,106 questions answered
Popular Conversations
7 × -11 User: 56 ÷ -7
9/25/2016 4:46:00 PM| 2 Answers
Expressed powers are
Weegy: Strict Constructionist User: People who are against capital punishment argue that it violates the
9/25/2016 9:43:37 PM| 2 Answers
IAB stands for
Weegy: what can i help you?
9/25/2016 12:21:25 AM| 1 Answers
What is a monopoly?
9/25/2016 1:58:33 AM| 1 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
P
P
P
P
P
L
Points 939 [Total 5011] Ratings 2 Comments 919 Invitations 0 Offline
S
P
1
L
Points 674 [Total 1554] Ratings 5 Comments 624 Invitations 0 Online
S
Points 205 [Total 499] Ratings 0 Comments 205 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 105 [Total 105] Ratings 0 Comments 105 Invitations 0 Offline
S
L
P
Points 97 [Total 1209] Ratings 0 Comments 97 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 72 [Total 72] Ratings 0 Comments 72 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 30 [Total 30] Ratings 3 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Offline
S
L
Points 25 [Total 4250] Ratings 1 Comments 15 Invitations 0 Online
S
L
P
P
P
Points 14 [Total 3876] Ratings 0 Comments 14 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 10 [Total 10] Ratings 1 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Offline
* Excludes moderators and previous
winners (Include)
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | © Purple Inc.