You have new items in your feed. Click to view.
Question and answer
• How did Chief Justice John Marshall manage to make the Supreme Court a viable, powerful branch of government?
The most common answer to this question is that John Marshall affirmed the right of judicial review over Congressional legislation; however, the Chief Justice contributed much more to the Judicial branch and the federal government, in general. [ John Marshall, fourth Chief Justice of the United States (1801-1835), was arguably the most influential person in the history of the judiciary. A
brilliant jurist with a genial personality, Marshall used both traits to position the Judiciary as a co-equal branch of the US government and to prevent states from eroding federal power after the Eleventh Amendment was ratified. Eliminated the Supreme Court tradition of issuing per seriatim opinions in favor of issuing a single, unified opinion of the Court. Affirmed the right of judicial review in his opinion for Marbury v. Madison, (1803) Employed the strategy of granting a narrowly defined win to the more powerful party that had far-reaching implications not obvious on the surface Exercised judicial activism supported by intricate legal theories that Thomas Jefferson called "twistifications." Advanced the doctrine of implied powers Invoked the Article I Necessary and Proper Clause Asserted the Article VI Supremacy Clause, elevating the authority of federal law over state law Discouraged states from defying the federal government's authority by holding the Eleventh Amendment by asserting the federal courts' appellate jurisdiction over state cases involving federal question jurisdiction Subordinated common law rule (laws based on court decisions) to statutory law Advanced the "complete diversity" principle that made it difficult for corporate shareholders to sue each other in federal courts Restrained the States from violating the terms of charters Upheld Congress's right to regulate laws affecting interstate business under the Interstate Commerce Clause (Gibbons v. Ogden, (1824)) Resolved issues of state sovereignty vs. ]
Expert answered|neildychauco|Points 90|
Question
Asked 7/30/2013 6:01:47 PM
0 Answers/Comments
Get an answer
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
26,190,101 questions answered
Popular Conversations
Used in MLA style instead of noting each source at the bottom of the ...
Weegy: All fields of research agree on the need to document scholarly borrowings, but documentation conventions vary ...
9/24/2016 7:39:25 PM| 3 Answers
Expressed powers are
Weegy: Strict Constructionist User: People who are against capital punishment argue that it violates the
9/25/2016 9:43:37 PM| 2 Answers
What are variable pay plans?
9/24/2016 1:46:45 AM| 1 Answers
Performance incentives include all the following EXCEPT Options ...
Weegy: Performance incentives include all the following EXCEPT? Performance incentives include all the following ...
9/24/2016 1:55:56 AM| 1 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
P
P
P
P
P
L
Points 939 [Total 5011] Ratings 2 Comments 919 Invitations 0 Offline
S
P
1
L
Points 663 [Total 1543] Ratings 5 Comments 613 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 205 [Total 499] Ratings 0 Comments 205 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 100 [Total 100] Ratings 0 Comments 100 Invitations 0 Offline
S
L
P
Points 97 [Total 1209] Ratings 0 Comments 97 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 72 [Total 72] Ratings 0 Comments 72 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 30 [Total 30] Ratings 3 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Offline
S
L
Points 25 [Total 4250] Ratings 1 Comments 15 Invitations 0 Online
S
L
P
P
P
Points 13 [Total 3875] Ratings 0 Comments 13 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 10 [Total 10] Ratings 1 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Offline
* Excludes moderators and previous
winners (Include)
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | © Purple Inc.