Question and answer
How does the adversarial system relate to the rights of the accused?
American justice is based on the adversarial, or accusatory, system, as opposed to the inquisitional system. [ Under the latter, a magistrate- or a king or religious official- takes an active role in determining facts and making judgments, while defense lawyers (assuming any are allowed) remain in the background, only speaking when asked to speak. This description calls forth a number of images,
none of them pleasant: the Spanish Inquisition or various other religious witch hunts, France under Louis XIV, the "kangaroo courts" of Nazi Germany and Stalinist Russia, or the Islamic fundamentalist system in Iran under the Ayatollah Khomeini. It is almost by definition a method in which the accused is guilty until proven innocent. Under the adversarial system, the roles are reversed: lawyers, both for the defense and the state, take an active part in the proceedings, while the magistrate assumes the passive position of a referee. In both situations, the magistrate maintains control over the courtroom, but in the adversarial scenario, he or she acts merely as the servant of the law, not as its source. Again, almost by definition, it is a system in which the accused is innocent until proven guilty. Thus the burden of proof is on the government, and guilt must be proven beyond all reasonable doubt. Read more: The Rights of the Accused during Trial - The Adversarial System - Magistrate, Proven, Lawyers, and Active - JRank Articles ]
Get an answer
Original conversation
User: How does the adversarial system relate to the rights of the accused?

Weegy: American justice is based on the adversarial, or accusatory, system, as opposed to the inquisitional system. [ Under the latter, a magistrate- or a king or religious official- takes an active role in determining facts and making judgments, while defense lawyers (assuming any are allowed) remain in the background, only speaking when asked to speak. This description calls forth a number of images, none of them pleasant: the Spanish Inquisition or various other religious witch hunts, France under Louis XIV, the "kangaroo courts" of Nazi Germany and Stalinist Russia, or the Islamic fundamentalist system in Iran under the Ayatollah Khomeini. It is almost by definition a method in which the accused is guilty until proven innocent. Under the adversarial system, the roles are reversed: lawyers, both for the defense and the state, take an active part in the proceedings, while the magistrate assumes the passive position of a referee. In both situations, the magistrate maintains control over the courtroom, but in the adversarial scenario, he or she acts merely as the servant of the law, not as its source. Again, almost by definition, it is a system in which the accused is innocent until proven guilty. Thus the burden of proof is on the government, and guilt must be proven beyond all reasonable doubt. Read more: The Rights of the Accused during Trial - The Adversarial System - Magistrate, Proven, Lawyers, and Active - JRank Articles ]
nielnaC|Points 140|

User: What distinctions can be made about the rights of the accused and how these rights protect the accused?

Weegy: 5th amendment - This protects the rights of the accused by saying that people do not have to testify against themselves in court.
rhyann24|Points 2455|

User: what is the inquistional system?





Weegy: The inquisitorial system can be defined by comparison with the adversarial, or accusatorial, system used in the United States and Great Britain. [ In the Adversary System, two or more opposing parties gather evidence and present the evidence, and their arguments, to a judge or jury. The judge or jury knows nothing of the litigation until the parties present their cases to the decision maker. The defendant in a criminal trial is not required to testify. In the inquisitorial system, the presiding judge is not a passive recipient of information. Rather, the presiding judge is primarily responsible for supervising the gathering of the evidence necessary to resolve the case. He or she actively steers the search for evidence and questions the witnesses, including the respondent or defendant. Attorneys play a more passive role, suggesting routes of inquiry for the presiding judge and following the judge's questioning with questioning of their own. Attorney questioning is often brief because the judge tries to ask all relevant questions. ]
Expert answered|smp0784|Points 4090|

Question
Asked 8/15/2013 4:12:37 PM
0 Answers/Comments
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
20,191,082 questions answered
Popular Conversations
MyPlate was created to __________.
3/30/2015 1:01:53 PM| 4 Answers
Solve the inequality 9(x - 3) 13/5 x 67/5
Weegy: 9(x - 3) User: Solve the inequality 8(x + 1) > 7(x + 2). x -22 x 6 Weegy: 8(x + 1) > 7(x + 2) 8x + 8 > 7x ...
3/31/2015 6:43:39 AM| 4 Answers
eukaryotes User: prokaryotes
Weegy: The answer is A. The origin of cell membranes, it cannot be any other listed. Anything else? User: Which kinds ...
3/30/2015 5:09:22 PM| 3 Answers
Solve. –5(1 – 5x) + 5(–8x – 2) = –4x – 8x
Weegy: –5(1 – 5x) + 5(–8x – 2) = –4x – 8x; -5 + 25x - 40x - 10 = -12x; -5 - 15x - 10 = -12x; -15 - 15x = -12x; ...
3/31/2015 8:56:36 AM| 3 Answers
Which is a part of the female part of the ...
Weegy: b
3/31/2015 9:03:40 AM| 3 Answers
A good political speech, according to the lecture, is a ...
Weegy: b. long User: For political speeches, it is suggested that you tell the audience what the main message of the ...
3/30/2015 12:01:14 AM| 2 Answers
What is anxiety disorder?
3/30/2015 12:22:28 AM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
P
L
P
P
P
Points 1274 [Total 9160]| Ratings 0| Comments 1274| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
Points 671 [Total 1582]| Ratings 6| Comments 611| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 567 [Total 1072]| Ratings 10| Comments 457| Invitations 1|Offline
S
P
C
L
P
L
1
P
Points 542 [Total 7849]| Ratings 8| Comments 462| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
L
Points 486 [Total 7987]| Ratings 0| Comments 486| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 423 [Total 1545]| Ratings 2| Comments 403| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 283 [Total 283]| Ratings 2| Comments 263| Invitations 0|Online
S
Points 199 [Total 567]| Ratings 3| Comments 169| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 42 [Total 158]| Ratings 4| Comments 2| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 35 [Total 126]| Ratings 0| Comments 35| Invitations 0|Offline
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2015 Purple Inc.