Question and answer
A court cannot exercise jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant who has only done business in the state over the Internet. True or False
True. Source:
Get an answer
Original conversation
User: A court cannot exercise jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant who has only done business in the state over the Internet. True or False

Weegy: True. Source:
eturker|Points 2667|

User: Business ethics apply only to the owners, operators and employees of corperations. True or False?

Weegy: Personal jurisdiction in Internet cases refers to a growing set of judicial precedents in American courts where personal jurisdiction has been asserted upon defendants based solely on their Internet activities. [ Personal jurisdiction in American civil procedure is premised on the notion that a defendant should not be subject to the decisions of a foreign or out of state court, without having “purposely availed” himself of the benefits that the forum state has to offer.[1] Generally, the doctrine is grounded on two main principles: courts should protect defendants from the undue burden of facing litigation in an unlimited number of possibly remote jurisdictions (in line with the Due Process requirements of the U.S. Constitution), and courts should prevent states from infringing on the sovereignty of other states by limiting the circumstances under which defendants can be "haled" into court. In the Internet context, personal jurisdiction cases often involve proprietors of websites or Internet-based services that either advertise or actively promote their businesses nationally, but argue that they do not have sufficient contacts within a particular state to subject them to litigation in that state. With the growth of the Internet, courts have faced the challenge of applying long-standing principles of personal jurisdiction to a borderless communication medium that enables businesses and individuals all over the world to instantaneously interact across state boundaries. This is a rapidly changing area of law without a U.S. Supreme Court precedent. There is however, a growing consensus among Federal District Courts as to how to determine when personal jurisdiction may be asserted in an Internet context ]
Expert answered|haudenschield|Points 90|

Question
Asked 10/27/2012 6:14:01 PM
0 Answers/Comments
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
17,972,543 questions answered
Popular Conversations
Weegy Stuff
S
L
1
1
1
1
L
1
L
Points 2722 [Total 15097]| Ratings 0| Comments 2722| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
1
L
P
C
1
P
C
1
L
Points 1649 [Total 11130]| Ratings 4| Comments 1609| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
1
L
P
P
L
Points 899 [Total 13128]| Ratings 0| Comments 899| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 615 [Total 2014]| Ratings 0| Comments 615| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
L
Points 527 [Total 6321]| Ratings 3| Comments 497| Invitations 0|Online
S
Points 482 [Total 482]| Ratings 0| Comments 452| Invitations 3|Offline
S
Points 454 [Total 455]| Ratings 6| Comments 394| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 277 [Total 277]| Ratings 1| Comments 267| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 48 [Total 1265]| Ratings 1| Comments 38| Invitations 0|Offline
S
P
C
L
P
L
1
Points 48 [Total 6282]| Ratings 0| Comments 48| Invitations 0|Offline
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2014 Purple Inc.