You have new items in your feed. Click to view.
Question and answer
Hearsay can be written statements, communicative conduct, or: (Points : 6) telepathic communications. oral statements. repressed memories of the witness. hypnotically
refreshed testimony
Hearsay can be written statements, communicative conduct, or: oral statements.
Question
Asked 8/25/2012 8:39:46 PM
Updated 8/25/2012 9:05:39 PM
1 Answer/Comment
Get an answer
New answers
Rating
0
Hearsay can be written statements, communicative conduct, or: oral statements.
Added 8/25/2012 9:05:39 PM
Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
Most jurisdictions in the federal government require a showing that the declarant is unavailable to trigger at least some of the hearsay exceptions.
Weegy: True - Unfunded mandates are programs required but not paid for by the federal government. The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 attempts to limit the number of unfunded mandates placed on states and local governments. User: There are no exceptions to the hearsay rule in the Federal Rules of Evidence. (Points : 6) True False Weegy: true User: There are no exceptions to the hearsay rule in the Federal Rules of Evidence. (Points : 6) True False Weegy: true User: To qualify as an exception to the hearsay rule, the statement must have some indicia of reliability. (Points : 6) True False Weegy: false, not since 2004. Under the precedent set in Ohio v. Roberts, 448 US 56 (1980), testimonial hearsay was admissible if it was was considered "reliable." This standard was overturned in Crawford v. [ Washington, 541 US 36 (2004), in which the US Supreme Court determined such evidence violated the defendant's Sixth Amendment protection under the Confrontation Clause, which holds that a defendant has a right to confront (question) witnesses who testify against him/her. In Crawford the Supreme Court ruled 9-0 that admitting "reliable" hearsay testimony was tantamount to assuming the defendant was guilty. Justice Scalia wrote: "Dispensing with confrontation because testimony is obviously reliable is akin to dispensing with a jury trial because a defendant is obviously guilty...." The Supreme Court decided the key was not a matter of reliability, but whether certain evidence could be considered testimonial, and therefore inadmissible in the absence of the witness; or whether the evidence qualified as non-testimonial, and therefore admissible on the grounds that introducing the material didn't trigger the Confrontation Clause. In 2006, the Supreme Court clarified their decision in Crawford in tandem cases, Davis v. Washington and Hammon v. Indiana, 547 US 813 (2006) that stipulated witness ... (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 8/25/2012 8:31:32 PM
0 Answers/Comments
To qualify as an exception to the hearsay rule, the statement must have some indicia of reliability. (Points : 6) True False
Weegy: False. It`a not true since 2004. Under the precedent set in Ohio v. Roberts, 448 US 56 (1980), testimonial hearsay was admissible if it was was considered "reliable." This standard was overturned in Crawford v. [ Washington, 541 US 36 (2004), in which the US Supreme Court determined such evidence violated the defendant's Sixth Amendment protection under the Confrontation Clause, which holds that a defendant has a right to confront (question) witnesses who testify against him/her. Read more: ] (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 8/25/2012 8:34:44 PM
0 Answers/Comments
27,040,476 questions answered
Popular Conversations
Weegy Stuff
S
P
P
L
Points 482 [Total 1251] Ratings 2 Comments 462 Invitations 0 Offline
S
P
P
L
P
P
Points 424 [Total 2398] Ratings 1 Comments 414 Invitations 0 Offline
S
P
P
L
P
Points 226 [Total 1440] Ratings 0 Comments 226 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 30 [Total 30] Ratings 3 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 24 [Total 24] Ratings 0 Comments 14 Invitations 1 Offline
S
Points 14 [Total 14] Ratings 1 Comments 4 Invitations 0 Online
S
Points 12 [Total 112] Ratings 1 Comments 2 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 12 [Total 22] Ratings 1 Comments 2 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 5 [Total 5] Ratings 0 Comments 5 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 4 [Total 4] Ratings 0 Comments 4 Invitations 0 Offline
* Excludes moderators and previous
winners (Include)
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | © Purple Inc.