Question and answer
Hearsay can be written statements, communicative conduct, or: (Points : 6) telepathic communications. oral statements. repressed memories of the witness. hypnotically
refreshed testimony
Hearsay can be written statements, communicative conduct, or: oral statements.
Question
Asked 8/25/2012 8:39:46 PM
Updated 8/25/2012 9:05:39 PM
1 Answer/Comment
Get an answer
New answers
Rating
0
Hearsay can be written statements, communicative conduct, or: oral statements.
Added 8/25/2012 9:05:39 PM
Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
Most jurisdictions in the federal government require a showing that the declarant is unavailable to trigger at least some of the hearsay exceptions.
Weegy: True - Unfunded mandates are programs required but not paid for by the federal government. The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 attempts to limit the number of unfunded mandates placed on states and local governments. User: There are no exceptions to the hearsay rule in the Federal Rules of Evidence. (Points : 6) True False Weegy: true User: There are no exceptions to the hearsay rule in the Federal Rules of Evidence. (Points : 6) True False Weegy: true User: To qualify as an exception to the hearsay rule, the statement must have some indicia of reliability. (Points : 6) True False Weegy: false, not since 2004. Under the precedent set in Ohio v. Roberts, 448 US 56 (1980), testimonial hearsay was admissible if it was was considered "reliable." This standard was overturned in Crawford v. [ Washington, 541 US 36 (2004), in which the US Supreme Court determined such evidence violated the defendant's Sixth Amendment protection under the Confrontation Clause, which holds that a defendant has a right to confront (question) witnesses who testify against him/her. In Crawford the Supreme Court ruled 9-0 that admitting "reliable" hearsay testimony was tantamount to assuming the defendant was guilty. Justice Scalia wrote: "Dispensing with confrontation because testimony is obviously reliable is akin to dispensing with a jury trial because a defendant is obviously guilty...." The Supreme Court decided the key was not a matter of reliability, but whether certain evidence could be considered testimonial, and therefore inadmissible in the absence of the witness; or whether the evidence qualified as non-testimonial, and therefore admissible on the grounds that introducing the material didn't trigger the Confrontation Clause. In 2006, the Supreme Court clarified their decision in Crawford in tandem cases, Davis v. Washington and Hammon v. Indiana, 547 US 813 (2006) that stipulated witness ... (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 8/25/2012 8:31:32 PM
0 Answers/Comments
To qualify as an exception to the hearsay rule, the statement must have some indicia of reliability. (Points : 6) True False
Weegy: False. It`a not true since 2004. Under the precedent set in Ohio v. Roberts, 448 US 56 (1980), testimonial hearsay was admissible if it was was considered "reliable." This standard was overturned in Crawford v. [ Washington, 541 US 36 (2004), in which the US Supreme Court determined such evidence violated the defendant's Sixth Amendment protection under the Confrontation Clause, which holds that a defendant has a right to confront (question) witnesses who testify against him/her. Read more: ] (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 8/25/2012 8:34:44 PM
0 Answers/Comments
20,200,162 questions answered
Popular Conversations
MyPlate was created to __________.
3/30/2015 1:01:53 PM| 4 Answers
Solve the inequality 9(x - 3) 13/5 x 67/5
Weegy: 9(x - 3) User: Solve the inequality 8(x + 1) > 7(x + 2). x -22 x 6 Weegy: 8(x + 1) > 7(x + 2) 8x + 8 > 7x ...
3/31/2015 6:43:39 AM| 4 Answers
eukaryotes User: prokaryotes
Weegy: The answer is A. The origin of cell membranes, it cannot be any other listed. Anything else? User: Which kinds ...
3/30/2015 5:09:22 PM| 3 Answers
Solve. –5(1 – 5x) + 5(–8x – 2) = –4x – 8x
Weegy: –5(1 – 5x) + 5(–8x – 2) = –4x – 8x; -5 + 25x - 40x - 10 = -12x; -5 - 15x - 10 = -12x; -15 - 15x = -12x; ...
3/31/2015 8:56:36 AM| 3 Answers
Which is a part of the female part of the ...
Weegy: b
3/31/2015 9:03:40 AM| 3 Answers
Evaluate the expression for x = -3. x^2 - 2x + 4
Weegy: The answer is x=5. User: Solve for c. ab - c = 9 Weegy: -2(2x + 5) - 3 = -3(x - 1) -4x - 10 - 3 = -3x + 3; ...
3/31/2015 10:35:54 AM| 3 Answers
A good political speech, according to the lecture, is a ...
Weegy: b. long User: For political speeches, it is suggested that you tell the audience what the main message of the ...
3/30/2015 12:01:14 AM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
P
L
P
P
P
Points 1274 [Total 9160]| Ratings 0| Comments 1274| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
Points 671 [Total 1582]| Ratings 6| Comments 611| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 567 [Total 1072]| Ratings 10| Comments 457| Invitations 1|Offline
S
P
C
L
P
L
1
P
Points 542 [Total 7849]| Ratings 8| Comments 462| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
L
Points 493 [Total 7994]| Ratings 0| Comments 493| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 425 [Total 1547]| Ratings 2| Comments 405| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 319 [Total 319]| Ratings 4| Comments 279| Invitations 0|Online
S
Points 199 [Total 567]| Ratings 3| Comments 169| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 42 [Total 158]| Ratings 4| Comments 2| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 35 [Total 126]| Ratings 0| Comments 35| Invitations 0|Offline
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2015 Purple Inc.