Notice: Payments for answers will end 4/10/2017. Click for more info.
You have new items in your feed. Click to view.
Question and answer
Q: What is the future role of private security in addressing the terrorism threat?
A: There has been a lot written about the role of private security in international relations since the invasion of Iraqin 2003. [ Much of it is emotional outpouring that either demonises the private security industry or represents it as a silver bullet that can transform humanitarian interventions.[1] What such work invariably lacks is a critical assessment of the potential utility offered by
private security companies (PSC) in expeditionary warfare.[2] It is impossible to do justice to the topic in a short piece such as this, especially given its controversial nature. However, the author will attempt to do his best; if only in outlining some of the major themes that governments and international organisations will need to address in the coming years concerning PSCs and international security. There is nothing new about the use of private actors in war. They have been a significant player in warfare throughout the ages. Indeed, only over the last 150 years has the state managed to maintain some type of monopoly over violence. Even so, since the end of the Cold War the market has gradually eroded that monopoly. At the start of the 21st Century, private actors are once more an important feature on the battlefield. As armies have become more specialised they have outsourced more mission tasks to the private sector, while the complex nature of expeditionary warfare has left governments with few alternatives to harnessing the capabilities of the market. States’ institutions are no longer able to cope with the range of tasks associated with humanitarian intervention. Rather a new set of institutional arrangements has gradually emerged to manage complex humanitarian interventions, including government agencies, non-governmental organisations, international organisations and the private sector. Importantly, new ways have had to be found to project power through networks that are non-territorial and transcend the public-private divide. ]
Expert answered|wintonjoe44|Points 20|
Question
Asked 1/11/2013 9:52:58 PM
Updated 1/11/2013 10:25:43 PM
1 Answer/Comment
Get an answer
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments
When you take information from another website, you must provide a link to your source. Please review Weegy's basic rules
Added 1/11/2013 10:25:43 PM
Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
Who is Bruce Wayne?
Weegy: Bruce Wayne is an American millionaire (later billionaire) playboy, industrialist, and philanthropist whose secret identity is Batman. (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Updated 2/19/2014 1:36:33 PM
0 Answers/Comments
26,495,337 questions answered
Popular Conversations
3a-5=-6a+1
Weegy: 3a - 5 = - 6a + 1 = a = 0.6666666667 or 2/3. Solution: 3a + -5 = -6a + 1; -5 + 3a = -6a + 1; -5 + 3a = 1 + ...
11/19/2017 2:37:56 PM| 3 Answers
Identify the italicized word. Don gave his "teacher" the note. ...
Weegy: Word bank: (Subject. Predicate. Direct Object. Indirect Object. Predicate Nominative. Predicate Adjective) 1. ...
11/14/2017 7:53:22 PM| 2 Answers
3.85 x 10^-3
Weegy: (3.85 x 10) - 3 User: Give the number of significant figures in this number: 40.00 Weegy: number of ...
11/15/2017 9:18:26 AM| 2 Answers
Paul had three ways to use his allowance money: spend, save, or ...
Weegy: Paul had three ways to use his allowance money: spend, save, or donate. He decided to donate his money to ...
11/16/2017 10:10:42 AM| 2 Answers
Simplify the given equation. 17x - 6 + 3x - 5 = x + 11 + 4x
Weegy: 6 - (3x + 10) + 4(2 - x) = 15 User: (x^2 + 17x + 63) ÷ (x + 8) =
11/16/2017 1:37:20 PM| 2 Answers
What is the new deal?
Weegy: The Second New Deal is the term used by commentators at the time and historians ever since to characterize the ...
11/16/2017 1:53:34 PM| 2 Answers
Solve for x. 7(3 - x) = 8(4 - 2x)
11/17/2017 5:41:10 AM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
P
Points 186 [Total 311] Ratings 11 Comments 76 Invitations 0 Offline
S
P
L
P
Points 24 [Total 154] Ratings 0 Comments 24 Invitations 0 Offline
S
P
P
L
P
P
Points 20 [Total 1658] Ratings 0 Comments 20 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 4 [Total 4] Ratings 0 Comments 4 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 2 [Total 2] Ratings 0 Comments 2 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 1 [Total 1] Ratings 0 Comments 1 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 1 [Total 1] Ratings 0 Comments 1 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 1 [Total 1] Ratings 0 Comments 1 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 1 [Total 1] Ratings 0 Comments 1 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 1 [Total 1] Ratings 0 Comments 1 Invitations 0 Offline
* Excludes moderators and previous
winners (Include)
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | © Purple Inc.