Question and answer
what is the policy consideration behind the relevant rule?
‘“Policy”’ has become a hideously inexact word in legal discourse' (Neil MacCormick, Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (1978)). In this respect, ‘policy’ is not unlike ‘values’. [ Each term is used from time to time in an all-embracing sense so as to include the other. The expression ‘policy considerations’ is generally reserved in the law for arguments or factors of a non-ethical kind, ‘values’
being a term used often to denote ethical values, though its use is by no means always so confined. Policy considerations may become relevant to the making of a judicial decision when the decision cannot be made by reference to established rules, whether grounded in precedent or even in statute. The Court will then consider the values and policy arguments that are relevant to the articulation of the potential rule (or principle). The Court must make an evaluation of them as a preliminary to articulating the rule to be applied in the instant case. The rule will have an application that extends beyond the parties to the case. Just how far it will extend depends upon its terms, its nature, and subject matter. In this context, policy arguments come into play as the rule to be adopted is shaped and evaluated by reference to its effect in producing a desirable state of affairs. A policy argument is not used to reach a decision in a particular case dissociated from the general rule to be applied, except in cases where the Court is exercising a statutory judicial discretion requiring the Court to take into account certain policy considerations. Even in such a case, a court will endeavour to deal with them in a principled way. As United States Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes observed in 1881, ‘every important principle which is developed by litigation is in fact and at bottom the result of more or less definitely understood views of public policy’. In this passage, Holmes was equating ‘public policy’ to ‘public interest’. He was not referring to public policy in its technical sense—for example, as a ground for rejecting evidence (Ridgeway v The Queen (1995)) or for invalidating contracts. ]
Get an answer
Original conversation
User: what is the policy consideration behind the relevant rule?

Weegy: ‘“Policy”’ has become a hideously inexact word in legal discourse' (Neil MacCormick, Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (1978)). In this respect, ‘policy’ is not unlike ‘values’. [ Each term is used from time to time in an all-embracing sense so as to include the other. The expression ‘policy considerations’ is generally reserved in the law for arguments or factors of a non-ethical kind, ‘values’ being a term used often to denote ethical values, though its use is by no means always so confined. Policy considerations may become relevant to the making of a judicial decision when the decision cannot be made by reference to established rules, whether grounded in precedent or even in statute. The Court will then consider the values and policy arguments that are relevant to the articulation of the potential rule (or principle). The Court must make an evaluation of them as a preliminary to articulating the rule to be applied in the instant case. The rule will have an application that extends beyond the parties to the case. Just how far it will extend depends upon its terms, its nature, and subject matter. In this context, policy arguments come into play as the rule to be adopted is shaped and evaluated by reference to its effect in producing a desirable state of affairs. A policy argument is not used to reach a decision in a particular case dissociated from the general rule to be applied, except in cases where the Court is exercising a statutory judicial discretion requiring the Court to take into account certain policy considerations. Even in such a case, a court will endeavour to deal with them in a principled way. As United States Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes observed in 1881, ‘every important principle which is developed by litigation is in fact and at bottom the result of more or less definitely understood views of public policy’. In this passage, Holmes was equating ‘public policy’ to ‘public interest’. He was not referring to public policy in its technical sense—for example, as a ground for rejecting evidence (Ridgeway v The Queen (1995)) or for invalidating contracts. ]
Expert answered|Neon Aloo|Points 133|

User: what does relevant rule mean?

Question|Rated good
Asked 8/4/2011 10:18:33 AM
0 Answers/Comments
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
0 questions answered
Popular Conversations
How far does a boat travel in 3 hours at 65 miles per hour?
Weegy: A boat travel in 3 hours at 65 miles per hour is 195 miles far. 3 hours * 65 miles/hour = 195 miles User: ...
3/2/2015 9:48:36 AM| 6 Answers
Evaluate the following expression. (81)0 0 1 8 User: ...
Weegy: Answer : If m=2 and n= -1 To evaluate m0 - n2 is 2(0) - -1 (2) = 0 - -2 = =+2 or simply 2 User: Evaluate the ...
3/2/2015 11:47:48 AM| 6 Answers
Describe the location of the point that has the following ...
Weegy: First Quadrant. User: Find the value of 7 + 32 (-5 + 1) ÷ 2. User: What is the fractional equivalent of ...
3/2/2015 10:04:10 AM| 5 Answers
Simplify 7 · 6 · 2h · d.
Weegy: Please state your question again. The one that you have put cannot be understood by Weegy! User: Simplify 7 · ...
3/2/2015 1:02:06 PM| 5 Answers
Factor 49t 6 - 4k 8
Weegy: 49t^6 - 4k^8 = (7t^3 + 2k^4)(7t^3 - 2k^4) User: Factor -5x 2 y + 10xy - 15xy 2 Weegy: Factor completely: ...
3/2/2015 2:56:09 PM| 4 Answers
Simplify -(4) to the -3 power User: Simplify -6 to the 0 power ...
Weegy: 4/5^-2 = 4/(1/5^2) = 4/(1/25) = 4 * 25/1 = 100/1 = 100
3/2/2015 8:20:12 PM| 3 Answers
All squares are rectangles. true or false
Weegy: A square is ALWAYS a rectangle. User: What is the most precise name for quadrilateral ABCD with vertices ...
3/2/2015 6:14:08 AM| 2 Answers
Which of the following ordered pairs is a solution of 2x - y = -9?
Weegy: The answers is 2x+9/x-2. User: Which of the following ordered pairs is a solution of 2x - y = -9? (4, -1) (3, ...
3/2/2015 8:52:55 AM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
P
L
P
P
P
Points 116 [Total 8002]| Ratings 0| Comments 116| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
L
Points 41 [Total 7542]| Ratings 0| Comments 41| Invitations 0|Offline
S
P
C
L
P
L
1
P
Points 31 [Total 7338]| Ratings 0| Comments 31| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 16 [Total 107]| Ratings 0| Comments 16| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 11 [Total 379]| Ratings 0| Comments 11| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 10 [Total 240]| Ratings 1| Comments 0| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
Points 2 [Total 913]| Ratings 0| Comments 2| Invitations 0|Offline
Points 0 [Total 0]| Ratings 0| Comments 0| Invitations 0|Offline
Points 0 [Total 0]| Ratings 0| Comments 0| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 0 [Total 0]| Ratings 0| Comments 0| Invitations 0|Offline
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2014 Purple Inc.