Question and answer
what is the policy consideration behind the relevant rule?
‘“Policy”’ has become a hideously inexact word in legal discourse' (Neil MacCormick, Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (1978)). In this respect, ‘policy’ is not unlike ‘values’. [ Each term is used from time to time in an all-embracing sense so as to include the other. The expression ‘policy considerations’ is generally reserved in the law for arguments or factors of a non-ethical kind, ‘values’
being a term used often to denote ethical values, though its use is by no means always so confined. Policy considerations may become relevant to the making of a judicial decision when the decision cannot be made by reference to established rules, whether grounded in precedent or even in statute. The Court will then consider the values and policy arguments that are relevant to the articulation of the potential rule (or principle). The Court must make an evaluation of them as a preliminary to articulating the rule to be applied in the instant case. The rule will have an application that extends beyond the parties to the case. Just how far it will extend depends upon its terms, its nature, and subject matter. In this context, policy arguments come into play as the rule to be adopted is shaped and evaluated by reference to its effect in producing a desirable state of affairs. A policy argument is not used to reach a decision in a particular case dissociated from the general rule to be applied, except in cases where the Court is exercising a statutory judicial discretion requiring the Court to take into account certain policy considerations. Even in such a case, a court will endeavour to deal with them in a principled way. As United States Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes observed in 1881, ‘every important principle which is developed by litigation is in fact and at bottom the result of more or less definitely understood views of public policy’. In this passage, Holmes was equating ‘public policy’ to ‘public interest’. He was not referring to public policy in its technical sense—for example, as a ground for rejecting evidence (Ridgeway v The Queen (1995)) or for invalidating contracts. ]
Ask a question
Not a good answer? Get an answer now. (FREE)
Original conversation
User: what is the policy consideration behind the relevant rule?

Weegy: ‘“Policy”’ has become a hideously inexact word in legal discourse' (Neil MacCormick, Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (1978)). In this respect, ‘policy’ is not unlike ‘values’. [ Each term is used from time to time in an all-embracing sense so as to include the other. The expression ‘policy considerations’ is generally reserved in the law for arguments or factors of a non-ethical kind, ‘values’ being a term used often to denote ethical values, though its use is by no means always so confined. Policy considerations may become relevant to the making of a judicial decision when the decision cannot be made by reference to established rules, whether grounded in precedent or even in statute. The Court will then consider the values and policy arguments that are relevant to the articulation of the potential rule (or principle). The Court must make an evaluation of them as a preliminary to articulating the rule to be applied in the instant case. The rule will have an application that extends beyond the parties to the case. Just how far it will extend depends upon its terms, its nature, and subject matter. In this context, policy arguments come into play as the rule to be adopted is shaped and evaluated by reference to its effect in producing a desirable state of affairs. A policy argument is not used to reach a decision in a particular case dissociated from the general rule to be applied, except in cases where the Court is exercising a statutory judicial discretion requiring the Court to take into account certain policy considerations. Even in such a case, a court will endeavour to deal with them in a principled way. As United States Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes observed in 1881, ‘every important principle which is developed by litigation is in fact and at bottom the result of more or less definitely understood views of public policy’. In this passage, Holmes was equating ‘public policy’ to ‘public interest’. He was not referring to public policy in its technical sense—for example, as a ground for rejecting evidence (Ridgeway v The Queen (1995)) or for invalidating contracts. ]
Expert answered|Neon Aloo|Points 133|

User: what does relevant rule mean?

Question|Rated good
Asked 8/4/2011 10:18:33 AM
0 Answers/Comments
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Home | Contact | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2013 Purple Inc.
Popular Conversations
what is anthropology
Weegy: Anthropology is the study of humankind, past and present, that draws and builds upon knowledge from social and ...
4/16/2014 3:13:10 AM| 3 Answers
Twenty-seven is 25% of a0.
Weegy: 15% of 25 is 3.75 User: what is 27 times 4 Weegy: You can factor the second part by using factors of 27 that ...
4/16/2014 3:46:34 AM| 3 Answers
Write the equation that satisfies the given conditions. The line ...
Weegy: The equation of the line that passes through (4, -1) and (-2, 3) is y = 5/3 - (2 x)/3 User: Write the equation ...
4/16/2014 12:10:38 PM| 3 Answers
What is the factored form of the expression? 4x2 – 81y2 A. ...
Weegy: 4x^2 ? 81y^2 the factored form is: B. (2x + 9y)(2x ? 9y)
4/16/2014 3:29:22 AM| 2 Answers
What is an S corporation?
Weegy: In a general sense, a corporation is a business entity that is given many of the same legal rights as an actual ...
4/16/2014 7:46:05 AM| 2 Answers
Which acid is used in batteries?
Weegy: A battery can change chemical energy to electricity by putting certain chemicals in contact with each other in a ...
4/16/2014 8:08:51 AM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
P
C
P
C
1
L
P
C
Points 1368 [Total 9249]| Ratings 0| Comments 1368| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
P
C
L
P
C
Points 1301 [Total 6688]| Ratings 0| Comments 1301| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
1
L
P
Points 412 [Total 7089]| Ratings 1| Comments 402| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 341 [Total 2788]| Ratings 2| Comments 311| Invitations 1|Offline
S
Points 138 [Total 554]| Ratings 0| Comments 138| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
Points 137 [Total 467]| Ratings 3| Comments 107| Invitations 0|Offline
S
R
Points 96 [Total 208]| Ratings 5| Comments 36| Invitations 1|Offline
S
Points 92 [Total 736]| Ratings 1| Comments 82| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 86 [Total 86]| Ratings 4| Comments 26| Invitations 2|Offline
S
P
C
L
P
Points 76 [Total 3921]| Ratings 0| Comments 76| Invitations 0|Offline