You have new items in your feed. Click to view.
Question and answer
what is the policy consideration behind the relevant rule?
‘“Policy”’ has become a hideously inexact word in legal discourse' (Neil MacCormick, Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (1978)). In this respect, ‘policy’ is not unlike ‘values’. [ Each term is used from time to time in an all-embracing sense so as to include the other. The expression ‘policy considerations’ is generally reserved in the law for arguments or factors of a non-ethical kind, ‘values’
being a term used often to denote ethical values, though its use is by no means always so confined. Policy considerations may become relevant to the making of a judicial decision when the decision cannot be made by reference to established rules, whether grounded in precedent or even in statute. The Court will then consider the values and policy arguments that are relevant to the articulation of the potential rule (or principle). The Court must make an evaluation of them as a preliminary to articulating the rule to be applied in the instant case. The rule will have an application that extends beyond the parties to the case. Just how far it will extend depends upon its terms, its nature, and subject matter. In this context, policy arguments come into play as the rule to be adopted is shaped and evaluated by reference to its effect in producing a desirable state of affairs. A policy argument is not used to reach a decision in a particular case dissociated from the general rule to be applied, except in cases where the Court is exercising a statutory judicial discretion requiring the Court to take into account certain policy considerations. Even in such a case, a court will endeavour to deal with them in a principled way. As United States Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes observed in 1881, ‘every important principle which is developed by litigation is in fact and at bottom the result of more or less definitely understood views of public policy’. In this passage, Holmes was equating ‘public policy’ to ‘public interest’. He was not referring to public policy in its technical sense—for example, as a ground for rejecting evidence (Ridgeway v The Queen (1995)) or for invalidating contracts. ]
Get an answer
Original conversation
User: what is the policy consideration behind the relevant rule?

Weegy: ‘“Policy”’ has become a hideously inexact word in legal discourse' (Neil MacCormick, Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (1978)). In this respect, ‘policy’ is not unlike ‘values’. [ Each term is used from time to time in an all-embracing sense so as to include the other. The expression ‘policy considerations’ is generally reserved in the law for arguments or factors of a non-ethical kind, ‘values’ being a term used often to denote ethical values, though its use is by no means always so confined. Policy considerations may become relevant to the making of a judicial decision when the decision cannot be made by reference to established rules, whether grounded in precedent or even in statute. The Court will then consider the values and policy arguments that are relevant to the articulation of the potential rule (or principle). The Court must make an evaluation of them as a preliminary to articulating the rule to be applied in the instant case. The rule will have an application that extends beyond the parties to the case. Just how far it will extend depends upon its terms, its nature, and subject matter. In this context, policy arguments come into play as the rule to be adopted is shaped and evaluated by reference to its effect in producing a desirable state of affairs. A policy argument is not used to reach a decision in a particular case dissociated from the general rule to be applied, except in cases where the Court is exercising a statutory judicial discretion requiring the Court to take into account certain policy considerations. Even in such a case, a court will endeavour to deal with them in a principled way. As United States Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes observed in 1881, ‘every important principle which is developed by litigation is in fact and at bottom the result of more or less definitely understood views of public policy’. In this passage, Holmes was equating ‘public policy’ to ‘public interest’. He was not referring to public policy in its technical sense—for example, as a ground for rejecting evidence (Ridgeway v The Queen (1995)) or for invalidating contracts. ]
Expert answered|Neon Aloo|Points 133|

User: what does relevant rule mean?

Question|Rated good
Asked 8/4/2011 10:18:33 AM
0 Answers/Comments
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
27,009,316 questions answered
Popular Conversations
4/9 = ? / 63
Weegy: 7 is the answer. 63 ? ( 9 ) = 7 User: Find a common denominator between the two fractions. 1/2 and 5/6 ...
2/20/2017 8:56:40 AM| 4 Answers
Reduce the following fraction to lowest terms: 3/8 User: Find the ...
Weegy: The greatest common factor of the numbers 28 and 42 is 4. User: Reduce the following fractions to lowest ...
2/20/2017 8:43:07 AM| 3 Answers
Simplify 5 + 2{x - 4[3x + 7(2 - x)]}. User: Find the ...
Weegy: 48a^3 bc^2 / (3abc) = 16a^2c User: Given: X = r + 2, Y = 2r - 9, and Z = r 2 + 17r + 30. Simplify [X · Y - ...
2/20/2017 2:07:55 PM| 3 Answers
What happens when factors of production (resources) fall?
Weegy: if the factors of production: land, capital and labor fail, then it is likely that production will halt because ...
2/20/2017 4:09:26 PM| 3 Answers
Saying positive things to yourself in order to develop a more ...
Weegy: Positive attitude is the power that drives you to success. Developing and manifesting a positive attitude makes ...
2/20/2017 8:54:48 AM| 2 Answers
2 7/8 ÷ 1/4 = User: 4/3 ÷ 1/2 =
2/20/2017 9:09:55 AM| 2 Answers
__________ is the chance a business owner will lose the time and ...
Weegy: RISK is the chance a business owner will lose the time and money invested in a business that proves to be ...
2/20/2017 10:48:17 AM| 2 Answers
People who make judgments in lower federal courts are called
Weegy: Federal : of, relating to, or being a form of government in which a union of states recognizes the sovereignty ...
2/20/2017 11:49:25 AM| 2 Answers
Find the GCF of 56 and 46.
Weegy: The GCF of 56 and 46 is: 2. User: Find the GCF of -10c 2 d and 15cd 2. Weegy: GCF of -10c^2d and 15cd^2 is ...
2/20/2017 2:30:31 PM| 2 Answers
What is an incident action plan
Weegy: Incident means: A usually minor event or condition that is subordinate to another; A definite and separate ...
2/20/2017 9:40:31 PM| 2 Answers
What was the Bay of Pigs? A. an American military base in Puerto ...
Weegy: The Bay of Pigs is a failed attempt by the U.S. to invade Cuba and overthrow the communist Castro regime. ...
2/21/2017 7:28:35 AM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
P
P
L
Points 381 [Total 1150] Ratings 2 Comments 361 Invitations 0 Offline
S
P
P
L
P
P
Points 322 [Total 2296] Ratings 1 Comments 312 Invitations 0 Offline
S
P
P
L
P
Points 226 [Total 1440] Ratings 0 Comments 226 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 30 [Total 30] Ratings 3 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 12 [Total 112] Ratings 1 Comments 2 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 12 [Total 22] Ratings 1 Comments 2 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 10 [Total 10] Ratings 1 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 10 [Total 10] Ratings 1 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Online
S
Points 5 [Total 5] Ratings 0 Comments 5 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 3 [Total 3] Ratings 0 Comments 3 Invitations 0 Offline
* Excludes moderators and previous
winners (Include)
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | © Purple Inc.