Notice: Payments for answers will end 4/10/2017. Click for more info.
You have new items in your feed. Click to view.
Question and answer
Q: what is the policy consideration behind the relevant rule?
A: ‘“Policy”’ has become a hideously inexact word in legal discourse' (Neil MacCormick, Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (1978)). In this respect, ‘policy’ is not unlike ‘values’. [ Each term is used from time to time in an all-embracing sense so as to include the other. The expression ‘policy considerations’ is generally reserved in the law for arguments or factors of a non-ethical kind, ‘values’
being a term used often to denote ethical values, though its use is by no means always so confined. Policy considerations may become relevant to the making of a judicial decision when the decision cannot be made by reference to established rules, whether grounded in precedent or even in statute. The Court will then consider the values and policy arguments that are relevant to the articulation of the potential rule (or principle). The Court must make an evaluation of them as a preliminary to articulating the rule to be applied in the instant case. The rule will have an application that extends beyond the parties to the case. Just how far it will extend depends upon its terms, its nature, and subject matter. In this context, policy arguments come into play as the rule to be adopted is shaped and evaluated by reference to its effect in producing a desirable state of affairs. A policy argument is not used to reach a decision in a particular case dissociated from the general rule to be applied, except in cases where the Court is exercising a statutory judicial discretion requiring the Court to take into account certain policy considerations. Even in such a case, a court will endeavour to deal with them in a principled way. As United States Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes observed in 1881, ‘every important principle which is developed by litigation is in fact and at bottom the result of more or less definitely understood views of public policy’. In this passage, Holmes was equating ‘public policy’ to ‘public interest’. He was not referring to public policy in its technical sense—for example, as a ground for rejecting evidence (Ridgeway v The Queen (1995)) or for invalidating contracts. ]
Get an answer
Original conversation
User: what is the policy consideration behind the relevant rule?

Weegy: ‘“Policy”’ has become a hideously inexact word in legal discourse' (Neil MacCormick, Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (1978)). In this respect, ‘policy’ is not unlike ‘values’. [ Each term is used from time to time in an all-embracing sense so as to include the other. The expression ‘policy considerations’ is generally reserved in the law for arguments or factors of a non-ethical kind, ‘values’ being a term used often to denote ethical values, though its use is by no means always so confined. Policy considerations may become relevant to the making of a judicial decision when the decision cannot be made by reference to established rules, whether grounded in precedent or even in statute. The Court will then consider the values and policy arguments that are relevant to the articulation of the potential rule (or principle). The Court must make an evaluation of them as a preliminary to articulating the rule to be applied in the instant case. The rule will have an application that extends beyond the parties to the case. Just how far it will extend depends upon its terms, its nature, and subject matter. In this context, policy arguments come into play as the rule to be adopted is shaped and evaluated by reference to its effect in producing a desirable state of affairs. A policy argument is not used to reach a decision in a particular case dissociated from the general rule to be applied, except in cases where the Court is exercising a statutory judicial discretion requiring the Court to take into account certain policy considerations. Even in such a case, a court will endeavour to deal with them in a principled way. As United States Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes observed in 1881, ‘every important principle which is developed by litigation is in fact and at bottom the result of more or less definitely understood views of public policy’. In this passage, Holmes was equating ‘public policy’ to ‘public interest’. He was not referring to public policy in its technical sense—for example, as a ground for rejecting evidence (Ridgeway v The Queen (1995)) or for invalidating contracts. ]
Expert answered|Neon Aloo|Points 133|

User: what does relevant rule mean?

Question|Rated good
Asked 8/4/2011 10:18:33 AM
0 Answers/Comments
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
26,572,069 questions answered
Popular Conversations
6. Solve the equation. Show your work. Check your answer. 3x – 7 = 5x ...
Weegy: 3x – 7 = 5x + 19 , 3x - 5x = 19+7, -2x = 26, - x=26/2, x=-13
1/10/2018 8:46:51 AM| 3 Answers
9/11= /22
Weegy: Multiply the numerator of the first fraction by the denominator of the second fraction. Set this equal to the ...
1/10/2018 4:50:25 PM| 3 Answers
19. In which one of the following circumstances could the doctor ...
Weegy: The following circumstances could the doctor charge a premium: An emergency call at 1:30 A.M.
1/7/2018 10:15:00 AM| 2 Answers
Simplify this expression: 19 – (–8) – (–14) = ? A. 25 ...
Weegy: 19 ? (?8) ? (?14)
1/15/2018 10:29:20 PM| 2 Answers
what does irrelevant mean
Weegy: An irrelevant cost is a cost that will not change as the result of a management decision. User: Find the ...
1/8/2018 8:16:56 AM| 2 Answers
Which of these lines contains a metaphor? A. You are like a ...
Weegy: The line that contains a metaphor is: User: Repeating consonant sounds, typically the last letter of a word, ...
1/8/2018 3:55:57 PM| 2 Answers
Cells are the basic of our bodies.
Weegy: Cells are the basic of our bodies. TRUE
1/10/2018 7:36:07 AM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
R
Points 438 [Total 730] Ratings 1 Comments 428 Invitations 0 Offline
S
L
Points 70 [Total 4521] Ratings 0 Comments 30 Invitations 4 Offline
S
P
L
P
Points 60 [Total 178] Ratings 0 Comments 60 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 17 [Total 17] Ratings 0 Comments 17 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 10 [Total 10] Ratings 0 Comments 0 Invitations 1 Offline
S
P
Points 5 [Total 44] Ratings 0 Comments 5 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 2 [Total 2] Ratings 0 Comments 2 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 1 [Total 1] Ratings 0 Comments 1 Invitations 0 Online
S
Points 1 [Total 1] Ratings 0 Comments 1 Invitations 0 Offline
S
P
L
Points 1 [Total 188] Ratings 0 Comments 1 Invitations 0 Offline
* Excludes moderators and previous
winners (Include)
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | © Purple Inc.