Question and answer
what is the policy consideration behind the relevant rule?
‘“Policy”’ has become a hideously inexact word in legal discourse' (Neil MacCormick, Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (1978)). In this respect, ‘policy’ is not unlike ‘values’. [ Each term is used from time to time in an all-embracing sense so as to include the other. The expression ‘policy considerations’ is generally reserved in the law for arguments or factors of a non-ethical kind, ‘values’
being a term used often to denote ethical values, though its use is by no means always so confined. Policy considerations may become relevant to the making of a judicial decision when the decision cannot be made by reference to established rules, whether grounded in precedent or even in statute. The Court will then consider the values and policy arguments that are relevant to the articulation of the potential rule (or principle). The Court must make an evaluation of them as a preliminary to articulating the rule to be applied in the instant case. The rule will have an application that extends beyond the parties to the case. Just how far it will extend depends upon its terms, its nature, and subject matter. In this context, policy arguments come into play as the rule to be adopted is shaped and evaluated by reference to its effect in producing a desirable state of affairs. A policy argument is not used to reach a decision in a particular case dissociated from the general rule to be applied, except in cases where the Court is exercising a statutory judicial discretion requiring the Court to take into account certain policy considerations. Even in such a case, a court will endeavour to deal with them in a principled way. As United States Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes observed in 1881, ‘every important principle which is developed by litigation is in fact and at bottom the result of more or less definitely understood views of public policy’. In this passage, Holmes was equating ‘public policy’ to ‘public interest’. He was not referring to public policy in its technical sense—for example, as a ground for rejecting evidence (Ridgeway v The Queen (1995)) or for invalidating contracts. ]
Get an answer
Ask Weegy or search for an answer now. (Free)
Original conversation
User: what is the policy consideration behind the relevant rule?

Weegy: ‘“Policy”’ has become a hideously inexact word in legal discourse' (Neil MacCormick, Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (1978)). In this respect, ‘policy’ is not unlike ‘values’. [ Each term is used from time to time in an all-embracing sense so as to include the other. The expression ‘policy considerations’ is generally reserved in the law for arguments or factors of a non-ethical kind, ‘values’ being a term used often to denote ethical values, though its use is by no means always so confined. Policy considerations may become relevant to the making of a judicial decision when the decision cannot be made by reference to established rules, whether grounded in precedent or even in statute. The Court will then consider the values and policy arguments that are relevant to the articulation of the potential rule (or principle). The Court must make an evaluation of them as a preliminary to articulating the rule to be applied in the instant case. The rule will have an application that extends beyond the parties to the case. Just how far it will extend depends upon its terms, its nature, and subject matter. In this context, policy arguments come into play as the rule to be adopted is shaped and evaluated by reference to its effect in producing a desirable state of affairs. A policy argument is not used to reach a decision in a particular case dissociated from the general rule to be applied, except in cases where the Court is exercising a statutory judicial discretion requiring the Court to take into account certain policy considerations. Even in such a case, a court will endeavour to deal with them in a principled way. As United States Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes observed in 1881, ‘every important principle which is developed by litigation is in fact and at bottom the result of more or less definitely understood views of public policy’. In this passage, Holmes was equating ‘public policy’ to ‘public interest’. He was not referring to public policy in its technical sense—for example, as a ground for rejecting evidence (Ridgeway v The Queen (1995)) or for invalidating contracts. ]
Expert answered|Neon Aloo|Points 133|

User: what does relevant rule mean?

Question|Rated good
Asked 8/4/2011 10:18:33 AM
0 Answers/Comments
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
0 questions answered
Popular Conversations
What year did the United States enter World War I? A. 1917 ...
Weegy: The United States enter World War I in: 1917. User: The first oil well was drilled in what geographical ...
7/31/2014 6:18:32 AM| 2 Answers
18-7x=-20.5 what is the value of x
7/31/2014 8:22:22 AM| 2 Answers
That man is a famous hockey player. a. Action verb b. Linking verb
Weegy: A linking verb is a verb that connects the subject of a sentence to the complement. User: The winter air ...
7/31/2014 8:47:58 AM| 2 Answers
The harvesting of wheat in British Columbia is an example of ...
Weegy: The harvesting of wheat in British Columbia is an example of A. ecological imperialism. User: Which of the ...
7/31/2014 10:34:41 AM| 2 Answers
(5x)=150 User: 3x+6=90
Weegy: 3x = 18 x = 18/3 x = 6
7/31/2014 11:27:49 AM| 2 Answers
25/6 User: 25869-4523
Weegy: 25869-4523 = 21346;
7/31/2014 12:32:48 PM| 2 Answers
Globally, sea levels have risen by _____ inches over the past 100 ...
Weegy: Globally is defined as something being throughout the world.
7/31/2014 1:19:07 PM| 2 Answers
What caused the disruption of the online service remains a ...
Weegy: What caused the disruption of the online service remains a mystery." The clause 'what caused the disruption of ...
7/31/2014 3:33:38 PM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
C
P
C
1
L
L
Points 21 [Total 13637]| Ratings 0| Comments 21| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
P
C
P
C
1
L
P
C
L
P
C
P
C
P
C
Points 12 [Total 17583]| Ratings 0| Comments 12| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
1
Points 9 [Total 3985]| Ratings 0| Comments 9| Invitations 0|Online
S
Points 7 [Total 143]| Ratings 0| Comments 7| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
Points 5 [Total 4569]| Ratings 0| Comments 5| Invitations 0|Offline
S
R
L
1
1
P
C
1
P
1
1
L
P
C
P
C
1
P
C
L
P
C
1
P
C
Points 3 [Total 21603]| Ratings 0| Comments 3| Invitations 0|Online
S
Points 2 [Total 205]| Ratings 0| Comments 2| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 1 [Total 12]| Ratings 0| Comments 1| Invitations 0|Offline
Points 0 [Total 0]| Ratings 0| Comments 0| Invitations 0|Offline
Points 0 [Total 0]| Ratings 0| Comments 0| Invitations 0|Offline
Home | Contact | Archive | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2014 Purple Inc.