Question and answer
what is the policy consideration behind the relevant rule?
‘“Policy”’ has become a hideously inexact word in legal discourse' (Neil MacCormick, Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (1978)). In this respect, ‘policy’ is not unlike ‘values’. [ Each term is used from time to time in an all-embracing sense so as to include the other. The expression ‘policy considerations’ is generally reserved in the law for arguments or factors of a non-ethical kind, ‘values’
being a term used often to denote ethical values, though its use is by no means always so confined. Policy considerations may become relevant to the making of a judicial decision when the decision cannot be made by reference to established rules, whether grounded in precedent or even in statute. The Court will then consider the values and policy arguments that are relevant to the articulation of the potential rule (or principle). The Court must make an evaluation of them as a preliminary to articulating the rule to be applied in the instant case. The rule will have an application that extends beyond the parties to the case. Just how far it will extend depends upon its terms, its nature, and subject matter. In this context, policy arguments come into play as the rule to be adopted is shaped and evaluated by reference to its effect in producing a desirable state of affairs. A policy argument is not used to reach a decision in a particular case dissociated from the general rule to be applied, except in cases where the Court is exercising a statutory judicial discretion requiring the Court to take into account certain policy considerations. Even in such a case, a court will endeavour to deal with them in a principled way. As United States Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes observed in 1881, ‘every important principle which is developed by litigation is in fact and at bottom the result of more or less definitely understood views of public policy’. In this passage, Holmes was equating ‘public policy’ to ‘public interest’. He was not referring to public policy in its technical sense—for example, as a ground for rejecting evidence (Ridgeway v The Queen (1995)) or for invalidating contracts. ]
Get an answer
Original conversation
User: what is the policy consideration behind the relevant rule?

Weegy: ‘“Policy”’ has become a hideously inexact word in legal discourse' (Neil MacCormick, Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (1978)). In this respect, ‘policy’ is not unlike ‘values’. [ Each term is used from time to time in an all-embracing sense so as to include the other. The expression ‘policy considerations’ is generally reserved in the law for arguments or factors of a non-ethical kind, ‘values’ being a term used often to denote ethical values, though its use is by no means always so confined. Policy considerations may become relevant to the making of a judicial decision when the decision cannot be made by reference to established rules, whether grounded in precedent or even in statute. The Court will then consider the values and policy arguments that are relevant to the articulation of the potential rule (or principle). The Court must make an evaluation of them as a preliminary to articulating the rule to be applied in the instant case. The rule will have an application that extends beyond the parties to the case. Just how far it will extend depends upon its terms, its nature, and subject matter. In this context, policy arguments come into play as the rule to be adopted is shaped and evaluated by reference to its effect in producing a desirable state of affairs. A policy argument is not used to reach a decision in a particular case dissociated from the general rule to be applied, except in cases where the Court is exercising a statutory judicial discretion requiring the Court to take into account certain policy considerations. Even in such a case, a court will endeavour to deal with them in a principled way. As United States Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes observed in 1881, ‘every important principle which is developed by litigation is in fact and at bottom the result of more or less definitely understood views of public policy’. In this passage, Holmes was equating ‘public policy’ to ‘public interest’. He was not referring to public policy in its technical sense—for example, as a ground for rejecting evidence (Ridgeway v The Queen (1995)) or for invalidating contracts. ]
Expert answered|Neon Aloo|Points 133|

User: what does relevant rule mean?

Question|Rated good
Asked 8/4/2011 10:18:33 AM
0 Answers/Comments
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
17,112,712 questions answered
Popular Conversations
What color is rain?
Weegy: The rain does not have a color it is water. If you notice water sometimes has a blue tint because it is a ...
8/22/2014 9:13:22 AM| 3 Answers
Deaths due to lifestyle diseases have declined since the early 1900s. ...
Weegy: Deaths due to lifestyle diseases have declined since the early 1900s. This is FALSE.
8/22/2014 11:58:34 AM| 3 Answers
A valid hypothesis must be testable.
Weegy: A valid hypothesis must be testable. True.
8/22/2014 8:28:55 AM| 2 Answers
The Nautilus is a submarine
Weegy: It is NOT true that the Nautilus is a submarine. User: Nautilus Weegy: We grow in ever-broadening paradigms ...
8/22/2014 8:43:56 AM| 2 Answers
The denouement of the novel is the action following the _____ of the ...
Weegy: The denouement of the novel is the action following the falling action of the novel and moving toward the ending ...
8/22/2014 8:56:11 AM| 2 Answers
Which word in the sentence is the direct object? We met her at the ...
Weegy: The direct object in the sentence "We met her at the county fair last night" is: night
8/22/2014 9:35:39 AM| 2 Answers
Simplify 5(R + 2) - 6.
8/22/2014 11:12:48 AM| 2 Answers
8)An injured person should only be moved if __________ a. The person ...
Weegy: An injured person should only be moved if the person is unconscious.
8/22/2014 12:36:58 PM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
R
L
1
1
P
C
1
P
1
1
L
P
C
P
C
1
P
C
L
P
C
1
P
C
P
C
Points 1921 [Total 23521]| Ratings 2| Comments 1901| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
1
L
Points 1546 [Total 5522]| Ratings 5| Comments 1496| Invitations 0|Online
S
L
C
P
C
1
L
L
Points 1439 [Total 15053]| Ratings 7| Comments 1369| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
1
1
1
1
L
1
Points 1395 [Total 9102]| Ratings 2| Comments 1375| Invitations 0|Online
S
L
P
C
L
P
C
P
C
L
P
C
P
C
P
C
Points 1249 [Total 16276]| Ratings 3| Comments 1219| Invitations 0|Online
S
L
P
C
P
C
1
L
P
C
L
P
C
P
C
P
C
P
C
Points 840 [Total 18411]| Ratings 0| Comments 840| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
L
Points 466 [Total 5030]| Ratings 0| Comments 466| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
1
L
P
P
L
Points 418 [Total 11079]| Ratings 1| Comments 408| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 311 [Total 311]| Ratings 1| Comments 281| Invitations 2|Offline
S
Points 217 [Total 228]| Ratings 3| Comments 157| Invitations 3|Offline
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2014 Purple Inc.