Question and answer
what is the policy consideration behind the relevant rule?
‘“Policy”’ has become a hideously inexact word in legal discourse' (Neil MacCormick, Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (1978)). In this respect, ‘policy’ is not unlike ‘values’. [ Each term is used from time to time in an all-embracing sense so as to include the other. The expression ‘policy considerations’ is generally reserved in the law for arguments or factors of a non-ethical kind, ‘values’
being a term used often to denote ethical values, though its use is by no means always so confined. Policy considerations may become relevant to the making of a judicial decision when the decision cannot be made by reference to established rules, whether grounded in precedent or even in statute. The Court will then consider the values and policy arguments that are relevant to the articulation of the potential rule (or principle). The Court must make an evaluation of them as a preliminary to articulating the rule to be applied in the instant case. The rule will have an application that extends beyond the parties to the case. Just how far it will extend depends upon its terms, its nature, and subject matter. In this context, policy arguments come into play as the rule to be adopted is shaped and evaluated by reference to its effect in producing a desirable state of affairs. A policy argument is not used to reach a decision in a particular case dissociated from the general rule to be applied, except in cases where the Court is exercising a statutory judicial discretion requiring the Court to take into account certain policy considerations. Even in such a case, a court will endeavour to deal with them in a principled way. As United States Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes observed in 1881, ‘every important principle which is developed by litigation is in fact and at bottom the result of more or less definitely understood views of public policy’. In this passage, Holmes was equating ‘public policy’ to ‘public interest’. He was not referring to public policy in its technical sense—for example, as a ground for rejecting evidence (Ridgeway v The Queen (1995)) or for invalidating contracts. ]
Get an answer
Original conversation
User: what is the policy consideration behind the relevant rule?

Weegy: ‘“Policy”’ has become a hideously inexact word in legal discourse' (Neil MacCormick, Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (1978)). In this respect, ‘policy’ is not unlike ‘values’. [ Each term is used from time to time in an all-embracing sense so as to include the other. The expression ‘policy considerations’ is generally reserved in the law for arguments or factors of a non-ethical kind, ‘values’ being a term used often to denote ethical values, though its use is by no means always so confined. Policy considerations may become relevant to the making of a judicial decision when the decision cannot be made by reference to established rules, whether grounded in precedent or even in statute. The Court will then consider the values and policy arguments that are relevant to the articulation of the potential rule (or principle). The Court must make an evaluation of them as a preliminary to articulating the rule to be applied in the instant case. The rule will have an application that extends beyond the parties to the case. Just how far it will extend depends upon its terms, its nature, and subject matter. In this context, policy arguments come into play as the rule to be adopted is shaped and evaluated by reference to its effect in producing a desirable state of affairs. A policy argument is not used to reach a decision in a particular case dissociated from the general rule to be applied, except in cases where the Court is exercising a statutory judicial discretion requiring the Court to take into account certain policy considerations. Even in such a case, a court will endeavour to deal with them in a principled way. As United States Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes observed in 1881, ‘every important principle which is developed by litigation is in fact and at bottom the result of more or less definitely understood views of public policy’. In this passage, Holmes was equating ‘public policy’ to ‘public interest’. He was not referring to public policy in its technical sense—for example, as a ground for rejecting evidence (Ridgeway v The Queen (1995)) or for invalidating contracts. ]
Expert answered|Neon Aloo|Points 133|

User: what does relevant rule mean?

Question|Rated good
Asked 8/4/2011 10:18:33 AM
0 Answers/Comments
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
20,604,876 questions answered
Popular Conversations
Find the product. (0.5n^5)2(10n^7)3
Weegy: (0.5n^5)^2(10n^7)^3 = 0.25n^10*1000n^21 = 250n^31 User: Find the product. (y 2)5 · y 8 User: Find the ...
4/27/2015 10:47:32 AM| 4 Answers
Red Herring
Weegy: A red herring in a story is a literary device where the author deliberately leads readers or characters towards ...
4/27/2015 10:06:37 PM| 4 Answers
Find the quotient. (4ab - 8a 2 + 12ac) ÷ 4a User: Find the sum and ...
Weegy: Can you provide us the options and clarify the equation given please. User: Find the sum and choose the ...
4/27/2015 10:32:59 AM| 3 Answers
What is shutter speed?
4/27/2015 11:20:00 AM| 3 Answers
Which civilization built Machu ...
4/27/2015 8:47:37 AM| 2 Answers
Solve for w in P = 2w + 2l, if P = 38 and l = 12 User: Solve for m ...
Weegy: 33.333333 repeater User: Solve for b 2 in A =1/2 h(b 1+b 2), if A = 16, h = 4, and b 1 = 3. Weegy: h = 2a / ...
4/27/2015 9:40:33 AM| 2 Answers
Find the product. 8y 3(-3y 2) User: Find the product. -7(-a 2)(-b ...
Weegy: question? User: (k 3)5 Weegy: question? User: Find the product. (102)3 User: Simplify. (fg)9
4/27/2015 10:38:23 AM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
Points 712 [Total 2289]| Ratings 1| Comments 702| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 633 [Total 1200]| Ratings 2| Comments 613| Invitations 0|Offline
S
P
C
L
P
L
1
P
P
1
Points 515 [Total 8392]| Ratings 3| Comments 485| Invitations 0|Online
S
Points 477 [Total 477]| Ratings 1| Comments 467| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 253 [Total 253]| Ratings 2| Comments 233| Invitations 0|Online
S
Points 247 [Total 247]| Ratings 2| Comments 227| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
L
Points 189 [Total 8183]| Ratings 0| Comments 189| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
1
R
Points 138 [Total 1210]| Ratings 2| Comments 118| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 125 [Total 3728]| Ratings 0| Comments 125| Invitations 0|Online
S
1
L
1
Points 43 [Total 3484]| Ratings 1| Comments 33| Invitations 0|Offline
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2015 Purple Inc.