Question and answer
what is the policy consideration behind the relevant rule?
‘“Policy”’ has become a hideously inexact word in legal discourse' (Neil MacCormick, Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (1978)). In this respect, ‘policy’ is not unlike ‘values’. [ Each term is used from time to time in an all-embracing sense so as to include the other. The expression ‘policy considerations’ is generally reserved in the law for arguments or factors of a non-ethical kind, ‘values’
being a term used often to denote ethical values, though its use is by no means always so confined. Policy considerations may become relevant to the making of a judicial decision when the decision cannot be made by reference to established rules, whether grounded in precedent or even in statute. The Court will then consider the values and policy arguments that are relevant to the articulation of the potential rule (or principle). The Court must make an evaluation of them as a preliminary to articulating the rule to be applied in the instant case. The rule will have an application that extends beyond the parties to the case. Just how far it will extend depends upon its terms, its nature, and subject matter. In this context, policy arguments come into play as the rule to be adopted is shaped and evaluated by reference to its effect in producing a desirable state of affairs. A policy argument is not used to reach a decision in a particular case dissociated from the general rule to be applied, except in cases where the Court is exercising a statutory judicial discretion requiring the Court to take into account certain policy considerations. Even in such a case, a court will endeavour to deal with them in a principled way. As United States Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes observed in 1881, ‘every important principle which is developed by litigation is in fact and at bottom the result of more or less definitely understood views of public policy’. In this passage, Holmes was equating ‘public policy’ to ‘public interest’. He was not referring to public policy in its technical sense—for example, as a ground for rejecting evidence (Ridgeway v The Queen (1995)) or for invalidating contracts. ]
Get an answer
Original conversation
User: what is the policy consideration behind the relevant rule?

Weegy: ‘“Policy”’ has become a hideously inexact word in legal discourse' (Neil MacCormick, Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (1978)). In this respect, ‘policy’ is not unlike ‘values’. [ Each term is used from time to time in an all-embracing sense so as to include the other. The expression ‘policy considerations’ is generally reserved in the law for arguments or factors of a non-ethical kind, ‘values’ being a term used often to denote ethical values, though its use is by no means always so confined. Policy considerations may become relevant to the making of a judicial decision when the decision cannot be made by reference to established rules, whether grounded in precedent or even in statute. The Court will then consider the values and policy arguments that are relevant to the articulation of the potential rule (or principle). The Court must make an evaluation of them as a preliminary to articulating the rule to be applied in the instant case. The rule will have an application that extends beyond the parties to the case. Just how far it will extend depends upon its terms, its nature, and subject matter. In this context, policy arguments come into play as the rule to be adopted is shaped and evaluated by reference to its effect in producing a desirable state of affairs. A policy argument is not used to reach a decision in a particular case dissociated from the general rule to be applied, except in cases where the Court is exercising a statutory judicial discretion requiring the Court to take into account certain policy considerations. Even in such a case, a court will endeavour to deal with them in a principled way. As United States Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes observed in 1881, ‘every important principle which is developed by litigation is in fact and at bottom the result of more or less definitely understood views of public policy’. In this passage, Holmes was equating ‘public policy’ to ‘public interest’. He was not referring to public policy in its technical sense—for example, as a ground for rejecting evidence (Ridgeway v The Queen (1995)) or for invalidating contracts. ]
Expert answered|Neon Aloo|Points 133|

User: what does relevant rule mean?

Question|Rated good
Asked 8/4/2011 10:18:33 AM
0 Answers/Comments
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
24,982,451 questions answered
Popular Conversations
What occurred while the surface rocks of the Moon were impacted, ...
Weegy: Bombardment by meteoroids formed the highlands t occurred while the surface rocks of the Moon were impacted, ...
4/29/2016 11:54:26 AM| 3 Answers
Who issued the "Grito de Dolores"? Vicente Guerrero Miguel ...
Weegy: When it was a French colony, Haiti was called St. Domingue. User: Simón Bolívar declared Brazil's ...
4/29/2016 1:50:52 PM| 3 Answers
Philosophical semantics is also known as _____. general ...
Weegy: Philosophical semantics is also known as GENERAL SEMANTICS. User: Frozen language occurs only in ...
4/29/2016 1:47:54 PM| 2 Answers
9/11 + 3/4 = User: 4/10 ÷ 1/3 =
4/29/2016 2:49:26 PM| 2 Answers
Tax incidence is concerned with:
Weegy: True! User: The term that describes how markets regulate themselves is known as:
4/29/2016 3:53:11 PM| 2 Answers
For place values that occur to the left of the decimal point, each ...
Weegy: For place values that occur to the left of the decimal point, each place value is ten times smaller than the ...
4/29/2016 6:27:04 PM| 2 Answers
A synonym is a word that has the same meaning as another word.
Weegy: A synonym is a word that has the same meaning as another word. TRUE. User: A synonym is a. A word that ...
4/30/2016 12:46:40 AM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
Points 944 [Total 944] Ratings 23 Comments 694 Invitations 2 Offline
S
1
L
L
P
R
P
L
P
Points 300 [Total 12252] Ratings 2 Comments 270 Invitations 1 Offline
S
L
P
P
P
Points 231 [Total 3377] Ratings 0 Comments 231 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 147 [Total 147] Ratings 3 Comments 117 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 47 [Total 47] Ratings 4 Comments 7 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 43 [Total 56] Ratings 4 Comments 3 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 20 [Total 20] Ratings 2 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 20 [Total 52] Ratings 2 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 16 [Total 69] Ratings 0 Comments 16 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 14 [Total 19] Ratings 0 Comments 14 Invitations 0 Offline
* Excludes moderators and previous
winners (Include)
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | © Purple Inc.