You have new items in your feed. Click to view.
Question and answer
what is the policy consideration behind the relevant rule?
‘“Policy”’ has become a hideously inexact word in legal discourse' (Neil MacCormick, Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (1978)). In this respect, ‘policy’ is not unlike ‘values’. [ Each term is used from time to time in an all-embracing sense so as to include the other. The expression ‘policy considerations’ is generally reserved in the law for arguments or factors of a non-ethical kind, ‘values’
being a term used often to denote ethical values, though its use is by no means always so confined. Policy considerations may become relevant to the making of a judicial decision when the decision cannot be made by reference to established rules, whether grounded in precedent or even in statute. The Court will then consider the values and policy arguments that are relevant to the articulation of the potential rule (or principle). The Court must make an evaluation of them as a preliminary to articulating the rule to be applied in the instant case. The rule will have an application that extends beyond the parties to the case. Just how far it will extend depends upon its terms, its nature, and subject matter. In this context, policy arguments come into play as the rule to be adopted is shaped and evaluated by reference to its effect in producing a desirable state of affairs. A policy argument is not used to reach a decision in a particular case dissociated from the general rule to be applied, except in cases where the Court is exercising a statutory judicial discretion requiring the Court to take into account certain policy considerations. Even in such a case, a court will endeavour to deal with them in a principled way. As United States Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes observed in 1881, ‘every important principle which is developed by litigation is in fact and at bottom the result of more or less definitely understood views of public policy’. In this passage, Holmes was equating ‘public policy’ to ‘public interest’. He was not referring to public policy in its technical sense—for example, as a ground for rejecting evidence (Ridgeway v The Queen (1995)) or for invalidating contracts. ]
Get an answer
Original conversation
User: what is the policy consideration behind the relevant rule?

Weegy: ‘“Policy”’ has become a hideously inexact word in legal discourse' (Neil MacCormick, Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (1978)). In this respect, ‘policy’ is not unlike ‘values’. [ Each term is used from time to time in an all-embracing sense so as to include the other. The expression ‘policy considerations’ is generally reserved in the law for arguments or factors of a non-ethical kind, ‘values’ being a term used often to denote ethical values, though its use is by no means always so confined. Policy considerations may become relevant to the making of a judicial decision when the decision cannot be made by reference to established rules, whether grounded in precedent or even in statute. The Court will then consider the values and policy arguments that are relevant to the articulation of the potential rule (or principle). The Court must make an evaluation of them as a preliminary to articulating the rule to be applied in the instant case. The rule will have an application that extends beyond the parties to the case. Just how far it will extend depends upon its terms, its nature, and subject matter. In this context, policy arguments come into play as the rule to be adopted is shaped and evaluated by reference to its effect in producing a desirable state of affairs. A policy argument is not used to reach a decision in a particular case dissociated from the general rule to be applied, except in cases where the Court is exercising a statutory judicial discretion requiring the Court to take into account certain policy considerations. Even in such a case, a court will endeavour to deal with them in a principled way. As United States Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes observed in 1881, ‘every important principle which is developed by litigation is in fact and at bottom the result of more or less definitely understood views of public policy’. In this passage, Holmes was equating ‘public policy’ to ‘public interest’. He was not referring to public policy in its technical sense—for example, as a ground for rejecting evidence (Ridgeway v The Queen (1995)) or for invalidating contracts. ]
Expert answered|Neon Aloo|Points 133|

User: what does relevant rule mean?

Question|Rated good
Asked 8/4/2011 10:18:33 AM
0 Answers/Comments
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
27,199,334 questions answered
Popular Conversations
Color vision deficiency is more common in males than in females ...
Weegy: Color vision deficiency is more common in males than in females because it is controlled by a gene located on ...
3/21/2017 12:01:49 AM| 4 Answers
Find the product. (5p – 6)(5p + 6)
3/21/2017 8:38:45 AM| 2 Answers
Write the decimal as a fraction or a mixed number in simplest form. ...
Weegy: Here is how you can write the decimal to the simplest form. User: Write the decimal as a fraction or a mixed ...
3/21/2017 11:42:41 AM| 2 Answers
Which of the following exercises should be included during warm-up ...
Weegy: Stretching should be included during warm-up and cool-down times. User: Regular exercise will enable you ...
3/21/2017 12:13:31 PM| 2 Answers
In 594 B.C. ______ was chosen as an Athenian statesman with ...
Weegy: In 594 B.C., Solon was chosen as an Athenian statesman with reformation powers. User: ______ were ...
3/22/2017 1:13:29 AM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
Points 520 [Total 621] Ratings 0 Comments 520 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 477 [Total 477] Ratings 0 Comments 477 Invitations 0 Offline
S
P
P
L
P
Points 218 [Total 1536] Ratings 1 Comments 208 Invitations 0 Offline
S
R
Points 205 [Total 305] Ratings 1 Comments 145 Invitations 5 Offline
S
P
P
L
P
P
Points 151 [Total 1603] Ratings 1 Comments 141 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 30 [Total 40] Ratings 3 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 13 [Total 13] Ratings 1 Comments 3 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 13 [Total 13] Ratings 1 Comments 3 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 10 [Total 10] Ratings 0 Comments 0 Invitations 1 Offline
S
Points 10 [Total 10] Ratings 0 Comments 0 Invitations 1 Offline
* Excludes moderators and previous
winners (Include)
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | © Purple Inc.