Question and answer
what is the policy consideration behind the relevant rule?
‘“Policy”’ has become a hideously inexact word in legal discourse' (Neil MacCormick, Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (1978)). In this respect, ‘policy’ is not unlike ‘values’. [ Each term is used from time to time in an all-embracing sense so as to include the other. The expression ‘policy considerations’ is generally reserved in the law for arguments or factors of a non-ethical kind, ‘values’
being a term used often to denote ethical values, though its use is by no means always so confined. Policy considerations may become relevant to the making of a judicial decision when the decision cannot be made by reference to established rules, whether grounded in precedent or even in statute. The Court will then consider the values and policy arguments that are relevant to the articulation of the potential rule (or principle). The Court must make an evaluation of them as a preliminary to articulating the rule to be applied in the instant case. The rule will have an application that extends beyond the parties to the case. Just how far it will extend depends upon its terms, its nature, and subject matter. In this context, policy arguments come into play as the rule to be adopted is shaped and evaluated by reference to its effect in producing a desirable state of affairs. A policy argument is not used to reach a decision in a particular case dissociated from the general rule to be applied, except in cases where the Court is exercising a statutory judicial discretion requiring the Court to take into account certain policy considerations. Even in such a case, a court will endeavour to deal with them in a principled way. As United States Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes observed in 1881, ‘every important principle which is developed by litigation is in fact and at bottom the result of more or less definitely understood views of public policy’. In this passage, Holmes was equating ‘public policy’ to ‘public interest’. He was not referring to public policy in its technical sense—for example, as a ground for rejecting evidence (Ridgeway v The Queen (1995)) or for invalidating contracts. ]
Ask a question
Not a good answer? Get an answer now. (FREE)
Original conversation
User: what is the policy consideration behind the relevant rule?

Weegy: ‘“Policy”’ has become a hideously inexact word in legal discourse' (Neil MacCormick, Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (1978)). In this respect, ‘policy’ is not unlike ‘values’. [ Each term is used from time to time in an all-embracing sense so as to include the other. The expression ‘policy considerations’ is generally reserved in the law for arguments or factors of a non-ethical kind, ‘values’ being a term used often to denote ethical values, though its use is by no means always so confined. Policy considerations may become relevant to the making of a judicial decision when the decision cannot be made by reference to established rules, whether grounded in precedent or even in statute. The Court will then consider the values and policy arguments that are relevant to the articulation of the potential rule (or principle). The Court must make an evaluation of them as a preliminary to articulating the rule to be applied in the instant case. The rule will have an application that extends beyond the parties to the case. Just how far it will extend depends upon its terms, its nature, and subject matter. In this context, policy arguments come into play as the rule to be adopted is shaped and evaluated by reference to its effect in producing a desirable state of affairs. A policy argument is not used to reach a decision in a particular case dissociated from the general rule to be applied, except in cases where the Court is exercising a statutory judicial discretion requiring the Court to take into account certain policy considerations. Even in such a case, a court will endeavour to deal with them in a principled way. As United States Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes observed in 1881, ‘every important principle which is developed by litigation is in fact and at bottom the result of more or less definitely understood views of public policy’. In this passage, Holmes was equating ‘public policy’ to ‘public interest’. He was not referring to public policy in its technical sense—for example, as a ground for rejecting evidence (Ridgeway v The Queen (1995)) or for invalidating contracts. ]
Expert answered|Neon Aloo|Points 133|

User: what does relevant rule mean?

Question|Rated good
Asked 8/4/2011 10:18:33 AM
0 Answers/Comments
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Home | Contact | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2013 Purple Inc.
Ad
Popular Conversations
Solve the inequality 5x
Weegy: 5x User: Solve the inequality 5x Weegy: 5x User: Solve the inequality 12x Weegy: It will be c.x User: Solve the ...
4/23/2014 4:34:04 PM| 7 Answers
Solve for x. x - 8 = -20 -28 -12 12 28
Weegy: 6(x - 2) = 4, 6x - 12 = 4, 6x = 4 + 12, 6x = 16, x = 16/6, or 8/3 in simplest form. User: The sum of ...
4/23/2014 1:27:55 PM| 3 Answers
5x + 4y + 15 + 2x - 8y - 5=
Weegy: The answer for 5x - 4y = 12 is y = 1/4 (5 x-12). User: 8(5a - b) - 6(4b-4a)= Weegy: a^2 - 5a - 6 = (a + ...
4/23/2014 8:09:04 PM| 3 Answers
Which country is not a permanent member of the U.N. Security ...
Weegy: the country which is not a permanent member of the UN council is (c) China. User: Who holds veto power in the ...
4/23/2014 10:11:57 AM| 2 Answers
Zeller, Inc., has 50,000 shares of stock outstanding. Zeller declares ...
Weegy: Zeller, Inc., has 60,000 shares of stock outstanding. Zeller declares a dividend of $580,000. ...
4/23/2014 10:05:10 AM| 2 Answers
What is the European Union?
4/23/2014 11:36:33 AM| 2 Answers
The United States and its allies launched operation “Desert Storm” in ...
Weegy: The United States and its allies launched operation “Desert Storm” in response to Iraq’s invasion of KUWAIT in ...
4/23/2014 11:50:36 AM| 2 Answers
troupe
Weegy: Chorus can be defined as a group of persons who speak or sing in a given part or composition in drama or ...
4/23/2014 11:53:48 AM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
P
C
L
P
C
Points 1846 [Total 7233]| Ratings 0| Comments 1846| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
P
C
P
C
1
L
P
C
Points 1817 [Total 9698]| Ratings 0| Comments 1817| Invitations 0|Online
S
1
L
C
L
Points 914 [Total 5717]| Ratings 4| Comments 874| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
1
L
P
Points 582 [Total 7259]| Ratings 2| Comments 562| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 480 [Total 2927]| Ratings 2| Comments 450| Invitations 1|Offline
S
L
1
1
1
Points 316 [Total 3582]| Ratings 7| Comments 246| Invitations 0|Offline
S
R
Points 267 [Total 379]| Ratings 6| Comments 187| Invitations 2|Offline
S
Points 217 [Total 217]| Ratings 6| Comments 137| Invitations 2|Offline
S
Points 170 [Total 586]| Ratings 0| Comments 170| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
Points 165 [Total 495]| Ratings 4| Comments 125| Invitations 0|Offline