You have new items in your feed. Click to view.
Q: In logic, arguments are never described as (Points : 1) true. valid. inductive. sound.
A: In logic, arguments are never described as 3. inductive.
Original conversation
User: In logic, arguments are never described as (Points : 1) true. valid. inductive. sound.

Weegy: In logic, arguments are never described as 3. inductive.
yhaine|Points 321|

User: All sound arguments are valid, but not all valid arguments are sound. This means (Points : 1) validity is necessary but not sufficient for soundness. validity is sufficient for soundness. soundness is not necessary for validity. validity is not necessary for soundness.

Weegy: The answer is 1. validity is necessary but not sufficient for soundness.
bongche|Points 1257|

User: When I once visited Texas, it was hot. So the next time I visit Texas, it will be hot" is an example of a (Points : 1) sound inductive argument. valid inductive argument. sound deductive argument. weak inductive argument.

Weegy: No, it would be a Deductive reasoning since your premise is the last time you visited Texas and you based on that to make your conclusion.
Boyinbedroom|Points 189|

User: Even if an inductive argument is extremely strong, its conclusion may still (Points : 1) be false. be necessarily true. be ungrammatical. fail to be syntactically well-formed.

User: Human reasoning tends to use a mixture of both (Points : 1) oil and vinegar. induction and deduction. induction and reduction. reduction and deduction.

Weegy: it should be induction and deduction
mythmoh|Points 4268|

User: To criticize a deductive argument logically, one might (Points : 1) hit the person making the argument. show one of the premises is false. show one of the premises is true. show the conclusion follows validly from the premises

Weegy: 2.show one of the premises is false.
Controler|Points 774|

User: One way to make an inductive argument stronger is to (Points : 1) ignore the argument. offer more reasons to support the conclusion. call the argument something in Latin. call the argument a deductive argument.

User: Even if an inductive argument is extremely strong, its conclusion may still (Points : 1) be false. be necessarily true. be ungrammatical. fail to be syntactically well-formed.

Question
Updated 5/30/2013 9:21:33 PM
Rating
1
True
Rated good by mnm, Rated bad by mnm, Rated good by mnm, Rated bad by mnm, Rated good by mnm

*
Get answers from Weegy and a team of really smart lives experts.
Popular Conversations
Solve for x 3x + 3 - x + (-7) > 6 A. x > 2.5 B. x > ...
Weegy: (3x + 1) + 8 = 4(x + 9), 3x + 9 = 4x + 36, 3x - 4x = 36 - 9, -x = 27, x = -27 User: Solve this ...
When adding a suffix that begins with a consonant, the general rule ...
Weegy: If the ending begins with a consonant, the spelling of the root word is usually not altered.
True or false? Stress has an effect on every system of the body.
Weegy: what is the question?
What's 3 * 4
Weegy: Synonyms for the word "say" which are bigger in length and in impact, are communicate, ...
What are number lines?
Supporting detail
S
L
Points 257 [Total 275] Ratings 0 Comments 187 Invitations 7 Online
S
L
R
Points 145 [Total 296] Ratings 1 Comments 5 Invitations 13 Offline
S
L
Points 135 [Total 135] Ratings 0 Comments 135 Invitations 0 Offline
S
R
L
R
P
R
P
R
Points 66 [Total 734] Ratings 0 Comments 6 Invitations 6 Offline
S
1
L
L
P
R
P
L
P
P
R
P
R
P
R
P
P
Points 62 [Total 13329] Ratings 0 Comments 62 Invitations 0 Offline
S
L
1
R
Points 34 [Total 1450] Ratings 2 Comments 14 Invitations 0 Offline
S
L
Points 10 [Total 187] Ratings 0 Comments 0 Invitations 1 Offline
S
Points 10 [Total 13] Ratings 0 Comments 10 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 10 [Total 10] Ratings 0 Comments 0 Invitations 1 Offline
S
Points 2 [Total 2] Ratings 0 Comments 2 Invitations 0 Offline
* Excludes moderators and previous
winners (Include)
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | © Purple Inc.