Notice: Payments for answers will end 4/10/2017. Click for more info.
You have new items in your feed. Click to view.
Question and answer
Q: In logic, arguments are never described as (Points : 1) true. valid. inductive. sound.
A: In logic, arguments are never described as 3. inductive.
Get an answer
Original conversation
User: In logic, arguments are never described as (Points : 1) true. valid. inductive. sound.

Weegy: In logic, arguments are never described as 3. inductive.
yhaine|Points 321|

User: All sound arguments are valid, but not all valid arguments are sound. This means (Points : 1) validity is necessary but not sufficient for soundness. validity is sufficient for soundness. soundness is not necessary for validity. validity is not necessary for soundness.

Weegy: The answer is 1. validity is necessary but not sufficient for soundness.
bongche|Points 1257|

User: When I once visited Texas, it was hot. So the next time I visit Texas, it will be hot" is an example of a (Points : 1) sound inductive argument. valid inductive argument. sound deductive argument. weak inductive argument.

Weegy: No, it would be a Deductive reasoning since your premise is the last time you visited Texas and you based on that to make your conclusion.
Boyinbedroom|Points 189|

User: Even if an inductive argument is extremely strong, its conclusion may still (Points : 1) be false. be necessarily true. be ungrammatical. fail to be syntactically well-formed.

User: Human reasoning tends to use a mixture of both (Points : 1) oil and vinegar. induction and deduction. induction and reduction. reduction and deduction.

Weegy: it should be induction and deduction
mythmoh|Points 4268|

User: To criticize a deductive argument logically, one might (Points : 1) hit the person making the argument. show one of the premises is false. show one of the premises is true. show the conclusion follows validly from the premises

Weegy: 2.show one of the premises is false.
Controler|Points 774|

User: One way to make an inductive argument stronger is to (Points : 1) ignore the argument. offer more reasons to support the conclusion. call the argument something in Latin. call the argument a deductive argument.

User: Even if an inductive argument is extremely strong, its conclusion may still (Points : 1) be false. be necessarily true. be ungrammatical. fail to be syntactically well-formed.

Question
Asked 3/18/2012 3:41:54 PM
Updated 5/30/2013 9:21:33 PM
1 Answer/Comment
New answers
Rating
1
True
Added 5/30/2013 9:21:33 PM
Rated good by mnm, Rated bad by mnm, Rated good by mnm, Rated bad by mnm, Rated good by mnm
Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
26,645,168 questions answered
Popular Conversations
Suppose the U.S. can produce cars for a lower opportunity cost than ...
Weegy: Suppose the U.S. can produce cars for a lower opportunity cost than Japan while Japan has a comparative ...
2/13/2018 7:30:37 PM| 4 Answers
Simplify and solve this equation for q: 3q + 5 + 2q – 5 = 65. ...
Weegy: 3q + 5 + 2q - 5 = 65 User: Solve the following inequality: 38 4 B. x 28 Weegy: 38 User: Use an ...
2/19/2018 12:26:32 AM| 3 Answers
What's the simplified form of 2x + 3 x + 5? A. x 8 B. ...
Weegy: (2x^2)(3x^2) = 6x4 User: Simplify this expression: 13 + (–12) – (–5) = ? A. –6 B. 6 C. –30 ...
2/12/2018 11:53:02 PM| 3 Answers
Solve this equation: 80 = 3y + 2y + 4 + 1. A. y = 1/5 B. ...
Weegy: 80 = 3y + 2y + 4 + 1 80 = 5y + 5 80 - 5 = 5y -5y = -75 y = 15 User: Solve the inequality: 12p + 7 > 139 ...
2/14/2018 2:20:46 PM| 3 Answers
Solve the equation: 12y = 132. A. y = 11 B. y = 144 ...
Weegy: 12y = 132 User: Solve this equation: 2s + s + 12 = 132. A. s = 40 B. s = –30 C. s = 9 D. ...
2/14/2018 2:32:47 PM| 3 Answers
Complete the following equation using , or = 7 ___24 4 A. ...
Weegy: 7 > 24/4 User: Edgar Anderson earns $300 a week plus a 15% commission only on sales he makes after his first ...
2/16/2018 3:58:09 AM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
Points 370 [Total 373] Ratings 11 Comments 230 Invitations 3 Offline
S
Points 89 [Total 89] Ratings 0 Comments 19 Invitations 7 Offline
S
P
L
P
P
Points 51 [Total 244] Ratings 0 Comments 51 Invitations 0 Offline
S
P
Points 41 [Total 85] Ratings 1 Comments 31 Invitations 0 Offline
S
1
L
L
P
R
P
L
P
P
R
Points 38 [Total 12649] Ratings 0 Comments 38 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 20 [Total 20] Ratings 2 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Offline
S
P
Points 13 [Total 30] Ratings 0 Comments 13 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 11 [Total 11] Ratings 1 Comments 1 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 10 [Total 10] Ratings 0 Comments 0 Invitations 1 Offline
S
Points 10 [Total 11] Ratings 1 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Offline
* Excludes moderators and previous
winners (Include)
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | © Purple Inc.