Question and answer
What are the tradeoffs to consider in selecting disability insurance?
When looking for a disability insurance policy, there are many things to consider. [ Since many disability policies offset or deduct social security disability benefits, there may be even more factors to consider when choosing a disability insurance policy. With so many different policy options, it can be hard to tell what is necessary and what isn’t. To aid in the process, we’ve narrowed it
down to the top 10 things to consider when choosing a disability insurance policy: Whether to purchase an individual policy or purchase a policy at work. If you are thinking of purchasing disability insurance, you may have the option of obtaining disability coverage through your employer’s group benefits plan. However, most of these plans limit your enforcement of coverage, should you ever become disabled, under federal ERISA law. ERISA affords great protection to the insurance company and almost none to you, the insured. The only advantage to these policies is that they are cheap or possibly even free, since your employer pays for most if not all of the premium. A better option, if you can afford it, is to purchase your own individual policy. Under this option, you have the advantage of enforcing your policy, should you ever need to use it, under more advantageous state bad faith law and deceptive trade practices acts. Also, make sure you have both short term and long term disability benefits. If you purchase disability coverage on your own, your premiums will be based on a number of factors including age, health and occupation. Individually purchased polices are more expensive but you get what you pay for. The specifics of your coverage can vary greatly depending on whether you purchase through your employer or not, so it is best to check both options to ensure you are getting the best coverage for your circumstances. ]
Expert answered|tjdcet|Points 11|
Question
Asked 6/6/2012 11:07:00 PM
0 Answers/Comments
Get an answer
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
A corporation is liable for the torts and crimes that are committed by its agents and employees when they are acting within the scope of their employment. Directors, officers, and employees are personally liable for the torts and crimes that they commit within the scope of their employment. Can and should these principles be applied to the disaster at the Deepwater Horizon offshore oil drilling platform in April 2010? If so, how?
Weegy: First under US Corporate laws, [ a corporation is formed partly for the purpose of limiting liability and maximizing its ability to profit its shareholders within the tax structure of the state in which it does business so long as the corporation complies with state and federal laws. When a corporation commits a tort, which is a provable harm done to a person or entity; it should have procured before hand, sufficient insurance coverage to cover that potential liability. However, if it commits a crime, no insurance under the sun will cover criminal activities. For purposes of this discuss, we can assume that the incidence that took place off the Gulf of Mexico was not committed by a crime syndicate, as BP and Transocean are NOT related to any Mafia syndicate, furthermore, the incidence that happened was not attributable to an intentional act. It was, at most, caused by "Negligence". Be it BP or Transocean (TO) or jointly, the Plaintiff (a person, any legal entity suing for recovery of damages) in a lawsuit must prove that either BP, TO or they jointly, had failed to conduct its exploration in accordance with the safety rules and procedures mandated by US Oil drilling standards. In order to ensure a favorable outcome, if the Plaintiff could FURTHER prove that BP and TO's drilling activity leading up to the date of the incidence was not in compliance with "industry standards". This is the key point Plaintiff must prove. Sometimes, governmental rules and regulations concerning drilling safety may not be as stringent as "Industry Standards” in the off-shore drilling industry. When an activity is "inherently dangerous" (there is no other safer alternative to lessen the dangerous aspect of this commercial activity) as evident in off-shore oil drilling, then, under most laws in US, it is judged by the “Strict Liability in Tort" standard. ] (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 6/6/2012 9:51:22 AM
0 Answers/Comments
A corporation is liable for the torts and crimes that are committed by its agents and employees when they are acting within the scope of their employment. Directors, officers, and employees are personally liable for the torts and crimes that they commit within the scope of their employment. Can and should these principles be applied to the disaster at the Deepwater Horizon offshore oil drilling platform in April 2010? If so, how?
Weegy: First under US Corporate laws, [ a corporation is formed partly for the purpose of limiting liability and maximizing its ability to profit its shareholders within the tax structure of the state in which it does business so long as the corporation complies with state and federal laws. When a corporation commits a tort, which is a provable harm done to a person or entity; it should have procured before hand, sufficient insurance coverage to cover that potential liability. However, if it commits a crime, no insurance under the sun will cover criminal activities. For purposes of this discuss, we can assume that the incidence that took place off the Gulf of Mexico was not committed by a crime syndicate, as BP and Transocean are NOT related to any Mafia syndicate, furthermore, the incidence that happened was not attributable to an intentional act. It was, at most, caused by "Negligence". Be it BP or Transocean (TO) or jointly, the Plaintiff (a person, any legal entity suing for recovery of damages) in a lawsuit must prove that either BP, TO or they jointly, had failed to conduct its exploration in accordance with the safety rules and procedures mandated by US Oil drilling standards. In order to ensure a favorable outcome, if the Plaintiff could FURTHER prove that BP and TO's drilling activity leading up to the date of the incidence was not in compliance with "industry standards". This is the key point Plaintiff must prove. Sometimes, governmental rules and regulations concerning drilling safety may not be as stringent as "Industry Standards” in the off-shore drilling industry. When an activity is "inherently dangerous" (there is no other safer alternative to lessen the dangerous aspect of this commercial activity) as evident in off-shore oil drilling, then, under most laws in US, it is judged by the “Strict Liability in Tort" standard. ] (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 6/6/2012 10:00:27 AM
0 Answers/Comments
21,759,452 questions answered
Popular Conversations
5. What is the correct order of the four steps of the writing ...
Weegy: A. revise. User: 6. The past tense of the verb drive is A. drove. B. droved. C. drived. D. driven.
7/31/2015 6:30:58 AM| 3 Answers
Mammals first appeared during the ______. a. Cenozoic ...
Weegy: Mammals first appeared during the TRIASSIC PERIOD.
7/30/2015 8:10:19 AM| 2 Answers
What is an example of adding energy to a substance and causing a ...
Weegy: A. heating a rock to make it hot User: A color change happens during an experiment mixing two liquids. Is ...
7/30/2015 12:32:38 PM| 2 Answers
Constantine was the first Christian ruler of Rome.
Weegy: CONSTANTINE was the first Christian ruler of Rome. User: A stele is an upright stone slab that is ...
7/30/2015 2:55:13 PM| 2 Answers
Write -2x 2(-5x 2 +4x 3) in standard form.
7/30/2015 3:10:48 PM| 2 Answers
Which of the following statements is true? Both photosynthesis ...
Weegy: Photosynthesis and cellular respiration are the two main processes performed by most living organisms to obtain ...
7/30/2015 4:56:50 PM| 2 Answers
4. Which one of the following word or words is an example of a ...
Weegy: A. Because User: 5. What is the simple subject of the following sentence? During the night, the frightened ...
7/30/2015 8:42:51 PM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
1
L
Points 868 [Total 1379]| Ratings 1| Comments 858| Invitations 0|Offline
S
P
C
L
P
L
1
P
P
1
P
1
P
L
Points 784 [Total 10318]| Ratings 3| Comments 734| Invitations 2|Offline
S
L
L
Points 348 [Total 8548]| Ratings 5| Comments 298| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 296 [Total 296]| Ratings 1| Comments 286| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 201 [Total 201]| Ratings 1| Comments 191| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
L
Points 83 [Total 8463]| Ratings 0| Comments 83| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 77 [Total 77]| Ratings 0| Comments 77| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 50 [Total 50]| Ratings 3| Comments 20| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 41 [Total 41]| Ratings 2| Comments 21| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 19 [Total 319]| Ratings 0| Comments 19| Invitations 0|Offline
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2015 Purple Inc.