Question and answer
Question not found
Ask a question
Not a good answer? Get an answer now. (Free)
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
After reading about the various proofs of the existence of God, identify which of these arguments seems to be the best, and explain why you think so. Complete your response by reflecting on why philosophers have sought for thousands of years to provide such proofs, and whether it is necessary to do so.
Weegy: Where are the arguments we need to choose from. You will have to post them so that this question can be answered. Thank you. User: The Ontological Argument The first purported proof of the existence of God is the ontological argument. The ontological argument seeks to prove the existence of God from the laws of logic alone. It dates back to St Anselm, an eleventh century philosopher-theologian and archbishop of Canterbury, but was also used by the French philosopher René Descartes. It argues that once we mentally grasp the concept of God we can see that God’s non-existence is impossible. This argument, if it is successful, demonstrates the existence of a perfect being that could not possibly fail to exist. The First Cause Argument The second purported proof of the existence of God is the first cause argument, also called “the cosmological argument”. The first cause argument seeks to prove the existence of God from the fact that the universe exists. The universe came into existence at a point in the distant past. Nothing can come into existence, though, unless there is something to bring it into existence; nothing comes from nothing. There must therefore be some being outside of the universe that caused the universe to exist. This argument, if it is successful, demonstrates the existence of a Creator that transcends time, that has neither beginning nor end. The Argument from Design The third purported proof of the existence of God is the argument from design, also called “the teleological argument”. The argument from design seeks to prove the existence of God from the fact that the universe is ordered. The universe could have been different from the way that it is in many ways. It could have had different laws of physics; it could have had a different arrangement of planets and stars; it could have begun with a more powerful or a weaker big bang. The vast majority of these possible universes would not have allowed for the existence of life, so we are ... (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Updated 1/9/2013 8:34:10 PM
1 Answer/Comment
Can you kindly specify the arguments you were referring to please?
Added 1/9/2013 8:34:10 PM
do god exist User: Complete your response by reflecting on why philosophers have sought for thousands of years to provide such proofs, and whether it is necessary to do so.
Weegy: god is everywhere, in happiness, in sadness, in loneliness he is everywhere. User: Complete your response by reflecting on why philosophers have sought for thousands of years to provide such proofs of god exist, and whether it is necessary to do so. (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 2/2/2012 10:49:39 AM
0 Answers/Comments
17,894,081 questions answered
Popular Conversations
3x+3/18x= User: 10x+3/=
Weegy: this is quite simple, if you read over the question a few times and learn the tendencies. One number is ten ...
10/20/2014 5:27:08 PM| 5 Answers
Which value for x makes the sentence true? 8x = 3x 30
Weegy: 8x - 20 = 3x + 5; 8x - 3x = 5 + 20; 5x = 25; x = 25/5; x = 5 User: 7x - 5 = 3x + 11 Weegy: 8x + 3 = 7x - ...
10/20/2014 7:11:38 AM| 2 Answers
Which value for x makes the sentence true? 8x = 3x + 20
Weegy: 8x - 20 = 3x + 5; 8x - 3x = 5 + 20; 5x = 25; x = 25/5; x = 5 User: Which value of x makes the following ...
10/20/2014 7:16:30 AM| 2 Answers
Which value of x makes the following equation true? 3(x - 3) = -2x ...
Weegy: 6(x - 2) = -2x + 28 6x - 2 = -2x + 28 6x - 12 = 28 + 2x 8x - 12 = 28 8x = 28 + 12 8x = 40 x = 40/8 x = ...
10/20/2014 7:18:42 AM| 2 Answers
After the auditorium filled up,we seated about fifty people on the ...
Weegy: After the auditorium filled up, we seated about fifty people on the stage. The sentence structure is: ...
10/20/2014 9:35:49 AM| 2 Answers
When particles are moving between two phases and no net change in the ...
Weegy: When particles are moving between two phases and no net change in the amount of either phase occurs, ...
10/20/2014 10:33:23 AM| 2 Answers
Is the example a complete sentence, sentence fragment, or run-on ...
Weegy: The bird dove swiftly then it landed gently on the branch. This is B. Complete sentence. User: Is the example ...
10/20/2014 10:38:45 AM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
1
1
1
1
L
1
L
Points 2160 [Total 14535]| Ratings 0| Comments 2160| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
1
L
P
C
1
P
C
1
L
Points 1393 [Total 10874]| Ratings 3| Comments 1363| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
1
L
P
P
L
Points 746 [Total 12975]| Ratings 0| Comments 746| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 459 [Total 1858]| Ratings 0| Comments 459| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
L
Points 452 [Total 6246]| Ratings 3| Comments 422| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 401 [Total 401]| Ratings 0| Comments 371| Invitations 3|Offline
S
Points 303 [Total 304]| Ratings 3| Comments 273| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 195 [Total 195]| Ratings 1| Comments 185| Invitations 0|Offline
S
P
C
L
P
L
1
Points 48 [Total 6282]| Ratings 0| Comments 48| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 27 [Total 27]| Ratings 0| Comments 27| Invitations 0|Offline
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2014 Purple Inc.