The fallacy Denying the Antecedent follows this invalid pattern: (Points : 2)
If A, then B. Not A. Therefore, Not B.
B is A, then C. C. Therefore, A and B.
A is before B. B ...
... follows. Therefore, A is before B.
This question has not been answered. Can you answer it? Please add your answer below ...
(See complete conversation and new answers below)
There are no new answers.