You have new items in your feed. Click to view.
Question and answer
Would a more gradualist approach to extending rights to and establishing freedom for African Americans have been more successful?
Many Americans like to imagine the history of their nation as one of continual progress. [ While acknowledging that not all persons and groups enjoyed equal rights at all times, Americans often take it for granted that American history moves in only one direction: toward greater rights, greater freedom, and greater equality. This perspective makes it difficult for many Americans to understand
the Reconstruction period and to place it in a broader historical narrative. The problem they face is that African Americans from roughly 1867 to 1875 enjoyed far more political influence and equal rights than they ever had before, or ever would again until the end of the modern Civil Rights Movement almost a century later. The fact that a group could be stripped of rights it once enjoyed is difficult for many Americans to accept, and so they often retreat into a false narrative, in which African Americans never gained any rights at all, and were abandoned to their fate as soon as slavery ended. In this model, the infamous Black Codes—which were in effect for less than a year—take center stage, and the various gains of Reconstruction get ignored. ]
Expert answered|Meynard|Points 50|
Question
Asked 5/16/2013 7:24:06 PM
0 Answers/Comments
Get an answer
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
Would a more gradualist approach to extending rights to and establishing freedom for African Americans have been more successful?
Weegy: Given these challenges, I have gradually settled on an approach to the ... White Americans did not expect blacks to participate in Reconstruction-era debates ... Even so, white northerners, and more so white southerners, presumed that they would ... [ The Codes explicitly denied blacks the right to vote, limited their freedom, source:nationalhumanitiescenter.org/tserve/freedom/1865.../reconstruction.htm? ] (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 5/16/2013 7:07:35 PM
0 Answers/Comments
Would a more gradualist approach to extending rights to and establishing freedom for African Americans have been more successful?
Weegy: Given these challenges, I have gradually settled on an approach to the ... White Americans did not expect blacks to participate in Reconstruction-era debates . (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 5/16/2013 7:17:21 PM
0 Answers/Comments
26,804,772 questions answered
Popular Conversations
Melinda's job consists of greeting visitors at the front desk of an ...
Weegy: The answer is C. Why would you e-mail your boss for directions. instead you should look it up yourself.
1/20/2017 11:24:37 AM| 2 Answers
_______ stated, "Remember the Alamo!" William Bowie Stephen ...
Weegy: The Texas Soldiers stated "Remember the Alamo." User: _______ prospered because of the attention given by the ...
1/20/2017 11:03:02 PM| 2 Answers
What is the frequency of a wave if 3 crests pass in 6 ...
Weegy: The frequency of a wave if 3 crests pass in 6 seconds is 0.5 Hz.
1/21/2017 12:32:19 AM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
Points 475 [Total 475] Ratings 1 Comments 465 Invitations 0 Offline
S
P
Points 212 [Total 643] Ratings 3 Comments 182 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 203 [Total 215] Ratings 0 Comments 203 Invitations 0 Offline
S
P
P
L
Points 154 [Total 1049] Ratings 2 Comments 134 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 88 [Total 90] Ratings 5 Comments 38 Invitations 0 Offline
S
L
P
P
P
Points 68 [Total 4027] Ratings 0 Comments 68 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 24 [Total 96] Ratings 0 Comments 24 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 11 [Total 11] Ratings 0 Comments 11 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 10 [Total 10] Ratings 1 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 10 [Total 10] Ratings 0 Comments 0 Invitations 1 Offline
* Excludes moderators and previous
winners (Include)
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | © Purple Inc.