The nature versus nurture debate is about the relative importance of an individual's innate qualities ("nature", i.e. nativism, or philosophical empiricism, innatism) versus personal experiences ("nurture") in determining individual differences in physical and behavioral traits. The philosophy that humans acquire all or most of their behavioral traits from "nurture" is known as tabula rasa ("blank slate").
In the "nature vs nurture" debate, nature refers to an individual's innate qualities (nativism or innatism). In the "nature vs nurture" debate, nurture refers to personal experiences (i.e. empiricism or behaviorism).
Example: Nature is your genes. The physical and personality traits determined by your genes stay the same irrespective of where you were born and raised. Nurture refers to your childhood, or how you were brought up. Someone could be born with genes to give them a normal height, but be malnourished in childhood, resulting in stunted growth and a failure to develop as expected.
Factors: Nature factors that trigger an individual to commit crime are influences by biological and family factors.
Nurture factors that trigger an individual to commit crime are influences by social and environmental factors.www.diffen.com/difference/Nature_vs_Nurture