Question and answer
Question not found
Ask a question
Not a good answer? Get an answer now. (Free)
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
What percentage of cases are dropped because of the exclusionary rule? (Points : 3) approximately 8% less than 10% more than 12% fewer than 2%
Weegy: The primary purpose of the Exclusionary Rule "is to deter future unlawful police conduct and thereby effectuate the guarantee of the Fourth Amendment against unreasonable searches and seizures." (United States v. Calandra (1974) 414 U.S. [ [ 338 [38 L.Ed.2nd 561]; Illinois v. Krull (1987) 480 U.S. 340 [94 L.Ed.2nd 364]; People v. Robles (2000) 23 Cal.4th 789, 799.) "?[T]he "prime purpose" of the [exclusionary] rule, if not the sole one, "is to deter future unlawful police conduct." [Citations]' (Citations)" (Italics added; People v. Sanders (2003) 31 Cal.4th 318, 324.) It is also the purpose of the Fourth Amendment to "safeguard the privacy and security of individuals against arbitrary invasions by government officials." (Camera v. Municipal Court (1967) 387 U.S. 523, 528 [18 L.Ed.2nd 930, 935].) An otherwise lawful seizure can violate the Fourth Amendment if it is executed in an unreasonable manner. (United States v. Alverez-Tejeda (9th Cir. 2007, citing United States v. Jacobsen (1984) 466 U.S. 109, 124 [80 L.Ed.2d 85].) Evidence illegally obtained by private persons, acting in a private capacity, is not subject to the Exclusionary Rule. (See Krauss v. Superior Court (1971) 5 Cal.3rd 418, 421; People v. North (1981) 29 Cal.3rd 509, 514; Jones v. Kmart Corp. (1998) 17 Cal.App.4th 329, 332.) Even a peace officer, when off-duty and acting in a private capacity, may be found to have acted as a private citizen. (See People v. Wachter (1976) 58 Cal.App.3rd 911, 920, 922.) However, the Exclusionary Rule is not intended to prevent all police misconduct or as a remedy for all police errors. "The use of the exclusionary rule is an exceptional remedy typically reserved for violations of constitutional rights." (United States v. Smith (9th Cir. 1999) 196 F.3rd 1034, 1040.) Not all courts are in agreement that such a remedy is reserved exclusively for constitutional violations. (See discussion in United States v. Lombera-Camorlinga (9th Cir. 2000) 206 ... (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 6/18/2012 3:58:14 PM
0 Answers/Comments
20,201,326 questions answered
Popular Conversations
MyPlate was created to __________.
3/30/2015 1:01:53 PM| 4 Answers
Solve the inequality 9(x - 3) 13/5 x 67/5
Weegy: 9(x - 3) User: Solve the inequality 8(x + 1) > 7(x + 2). x -22 x 6 Weegy: 8(x + 1) > 7(x + 2) 8x + 8 > 7x ...
3/31/2015 6:43:39 AM| 4 Answers
eukaryotes User: prokaryotes
Weegy: The answer is A. The origin of cell membranes, it cannot be any other listed. Anything else? User: Which kinds ...
3/30/2015 5:09:22 PM| 3 Answers
Solve. –5(1 – 5x) + 5(–8x – 2) = –4x – 8x
Weegy: –5(1 – 5x) + 5(–8x – 2) = –4x – 8x; -5 + 25x - 40x - 10 = -12x; -5 - 15x - 10 = -12x; -15 - 15x = -12x; ...
3/31/2015 8:56:36 AM| 3 Answers
Which is a part of the female part of the ...
Weegy: b
3/31/2015 9:03:40 AM| 3 Answers
Evaluate the expression for x = -3. x^2 - 2x + 4
Weegy: The answer is x=5. User: Solve for c. ab - c = 9 Weegy: -2(2x + 5) - 3 = -3(x - 1) -4x - 10 - 3 = -3x + 3; ...
3/31/2015 10:35:54 AM| 3 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
P
L
P
P
P
Points 1274 [Total 9160]| Ratings 0| Comments 1274| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
Points 671 [Total 1582]| Ratings 6| Comments 611| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 567 [Total 1072]| Ratings 10| Comments 457| Invitations 1|Offline
S
P
C
L
P
L
1
P
Points 558 [Total 7865]| Ratings 8| Comments 478| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
L
Points 493 [Total 7994]| Ratings 0| Comments 493| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 441 [Total 1563]| Ratings 2| Comments 421| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 323 [Total 323]| Ratings 4| Comments 283| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 199 [Total 567]| Ratings 3| Comments 169| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 42 [Total 158]| Ratings 4| Comments 2| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 35 [Total 126]| Ratings 0| Comments 35| Invitations 0|Offline
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2015 Purple Inc.