Question and answer
Question not found
Ask a question
Not a good answer? Get an answer now. (Free)
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
What percentage of cases are dropped because of the exclusionary rule? (Points : 3) approximately 8% less than 10% more than 12% fewer than 2%
Weegy: The primary purpose of the Exclusionary Rule "is to deter future unlawful police conduct and thereby effectuate the guarantee of the Fourth Amendment against unreasonable searches and seizures." (United States v. Calandra (1974) 414 U.S. [ [ 338 [38 L.Ed.2nd 561]; Illinois v. Krull (1987) 480 U.S. 340 [94 L.Ed.2nd 364]; People v. Robles (2000) 23 Cal.4th 789, 799.) "?[T]he "prime purpose" of the [exclusionary] rule, if not the sole one, "is to deter future unlawful police conduct." [Citations]' (Citations)" (Italics added; People v. Sanders (2003) 31 Cal.4th 318, 324.) It is also the purpose of the Fourth Amendment to "safeguard the privacy and security of individuals against arbitrary invasions by government officials." (Camera v. Municipal Court (1967) 387 U.S. 523, 528 [18 L.Ed.2nd 930, 935].) An otherwise lawful seizure can violate the Fourth Amendment if it is executed in an unreasonable manner. (United States v. Alverez-Tejeda (9th Cir. 2007, citing United States v. Jacobsen (1984) 466 U.S. 109, 124 [80 L.Ed.2d 85].) Evidence illegally obtained by private persons, acting in a private capacity, is not subject to the Exclusionary Rule. (See Krauss v. Superior Court (1971) 5 Cal.3rd 418, 421; People v. North (1981) 29 Cal.3rd 509, 514; Jones v. Kmart Corp. (1998) 17 Cal.App.4th 329, 332.) Even a peace officer, when off-duty and acting in a private capacity, may be found to have acted as a private citizen. (See People v. Wachter (1976) 58 Cal.App.3rd 911, 920, 922.) However, the Exclusionary Rule is not intended to prevent all police misconduct or as a remedy for all police errors. "The use of the exclusionary rule is an exceptional remedy typically reserved for violations of constitutional rights." (United States v. Smith (9th Cir. 1999) 196 F.3rd 1034, 1040.) Not all courts are in agreement that such a remedy is reserved exclusively for constitutional violations. (See discussion in United States v. Lombera-Camorlinga (9th Cir. 2000) 206 ... (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 6/18/2012 3:58:14 PM
0 Answers/Comments
21,079,897 questions answered
Popular Conversations
What is the middle term of the product of (x - 4)(x - 3)? User: ...
Weegy: b.(p + 2)(p + 16) to check: p*p + (2p + 16p) + (2 * 16) = p^2 + 18p + 32 so the answer is b.(p + 2)(p + 16) ...
5/26/2015 1:22:27 PM| 3 Answers
Give the next two numbers in this pattern: 0, 0.75, 1.5, 2.25, ... ...
Weegy: 0.6/0.75 = 0.8 User: Find the direct variation equation which passes through (0, 0) and (4, 1). A. y = 4x ...
5/26/2015 12:36:07 AM| 2 Answers
Evaluate f-2g for f = 4 and g = 32. 2 8 User: Write 6,000,370 in ...
Weegy: y*9 User: (b2)3 Weegy: the bond order of b2 is 1, one bond order = 1/2 (#e- in bonding MO's - #e- in ...
5/26/2015 10:14:55 AM| 2 Answers
What is the solution set of the given equation? 4y - 6y + 9y = -2
Weegy: 4y - 6y + 9y = -2 -2y + 9y = -2 7y = -2 y = -2/7 User: Solve for x. 5x - 6 = 4x + 8 Weegy: ...
5/26/2015 12:20:50 PM| 2 Answers
A major characteristic of monopolistic competition is that prices ...
Weegy: A. higher than in perfect competition. User: A minimum price, set by the government, that must be paid for a ...
5/26/2015 12:56:40 PM| 2 Answers
(2x – 1)(x + 7) = 0
Weegy: (2x + 1)(x + 7) = 0; 2x + 1 = 0; 2x = -1; x = -1/2; x + 7 = 0; x = -7; x = -1/2 or x = -7 User: x^2 ...
5/26/2015 4:37:35 PM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
Points 706 [Total 1236]| Ratings 2| Comments 686| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 702 [Total 710]| Ratings 1| Comments 692| Invitations 0|Online
S
1
Points 538 [Total 930]| Ratings 2| Comments 518| Invitations 0|Online
S
L
P
Points 408 [Total 2885]| Ratings 1| Comments 398| Invitations 0|Offline
S
P
C
L
P
L
1
P
P
1
P
1
Points 248 [Total 8994]| Ratings 0| Comments 248| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 134 [Total 154]| Ratings 0| Comments 134| Invitations 0|Online
S
1
L
L
Points 82 [Total 8265]| Ratings 0| Comments 82| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 56 [Total 3810]| Ratings 2| Comments 36| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
1
R
Points 45 [Total 1332]| Ratings 0| Comments 45| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 20 [Total 20]| Ratings 2| Comments 0| Invitations 0|Online
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2015 Purple Inc.