You have new items in your feed. Click to view.
Question and answer
The standard guideline for determining the judicial admissibility of scientific examination stemmed from which court ruling? Mincy v. Arizona Kumbo Tire Co., Ltd. V. Carmichael Frye v.
United States Coppolino v. State
Rule 702
Get an answer
Original conversation
User: Regardless of its source, all criminal law in the U.S. must conform to the rules and dictates of the: State supreme courts Office of the President United States Senate U.S. Constitution

User: The standard guideline for determining the judicial admissibility of scientific examination stemmed from which court ruling? Mincy v. Arizona Kumbo Tire Co., Ltd. V. Carmichael Frye v. United States Coppolino v. State

Weegy: Rule 702
Expert answered|bounty74|Points 175|

Question
Asked 7/7/2012 9:45:46 PM
0 Answers/Comments
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
The Supreme Court restricted the practice of conducting warrantless searches at a homicide scene in the case of:Michigan v. Tyler Frye v. United States Mincey v. Arizona Coppolino v. State
Weegy: United States Mincey v. Arizona. In Mincey v. Arizona 437 US 385 (1978) The Supreme Court cited that the police had violated the defendant's fourth amendment rights. [ Mincey, who was dope dealer, had shot and killed an undercover narcotics officer during a drug raid. Mincey was wounded and one of his companions were killed in the subsequent gun battle. The Narcotics officers, following procedure secured the premises and notified Homicide. Homicide detectives conducted an investigation during which hundreds of pieces of evidence were seized by the police over a three-day crime scene search. Mincey was convicted of the murder of the undercover officer. The conviction was overturned by the Supreme Court, which maintained that Mincey's Fourth Amendment rights were violated and that the police who should have secured a search warrant. The Supreme Court basically informed law enforcement that "There wasn't any homicide crime scene exception" to the Fourth Amendment. ] User: The "general acceptance" principle, which serves as a criterion for the judicial admissibility of scientific evidence, was set forth in the case of : Michigan v. Tyler Frye v. United States Mincey v. Arizona Coppolino v. State Weegy: The "general acceptance" principle, which serves as a criterion for the judicial admissibility of scientific evidence, was set forth in the case of Frye v. United States. source: User: A Florida case that exemplifies the flexibility and wide discretion that the trial judge has in matters of scientific inquiry is: Michigan v. Tyler Frye v. United States Coppolino v. State Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Weegy: Coppolino v. State. (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 7/7/2012 9:59:13 PM
0 Answers/Comments
An individual who testifies in court and who possesses special skills or knowledge not ordinarily possessed by others, acquired through experience, study, observation, or education, and who is permitted to interpret such information for the jury, give opinions, and draw conclusions is called: A lay witness A police officer An expert witness A forensic scientist
Weegy: An expert witness User: The Daubert case stands for the proposition that for scientific evidence to be admissible in court, it must be: Generally acceptable in the scientific community Proven beyond any doubt Scientifically valid Published Weegy: Proven beyond any doubt . The Daubert Hearing is conducted out of the jury's presence and is usually based on a motion in limine, which occurs before the trial even begins and determines which evidence or testimony will be presented to the jury. [ [ Foresic expert witness can be asked ton attend a Daubert hearing if any evidence needs to be examined. ] ] User: The ability of the investigator to recognize and collect crime-scene evidence properly depends on the amount of Testimony received from the crime laboratory true or false (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 7/7/2012 9:51:56 PM
0 Answers/Comments
26,771,962 questions answered
Popular Conversations
3r = 10 + 5s, when r = 10?
Weegy: r(r+3) = 1 User: 5x + 2y = 20, when x = 0.3? User: What is the value of a in the equation 3a + b = 54, when b ...
1/17/2017 9:50:12 AM| 3 Answers
Evaluate |5 - 15|
Weegy: 5|7 - 9| - 2; 5(2) - 2; 10 - 2 = 8 User: Evaluate |a + b - c|, given a = 5, b = -3, and c = -2
1/16/2017 5:07:37 PM| 2 Answers
Evaluate |3 - 5 + 7|
Weegy: 5 - 3x when x = -7 5 - 3(-7); = 5 - (-21); = 5 + 21; = 26 User: Evaluate 5|7 - 9| - 2 User: Evaluate |6| ...
1/16/2017 5:09:01 PM| 2 Answers
All men were given the right to vote in the Fifteenth Amendment, ...
Weegy: All men were given the right to vote in the Fifteenth Amendment, and women in the Nineteenth Amendment. ...
1/17/2017 9:22:18 AM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
Points 284 [Total 284] Ratings 0 Comments 284 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 168 [Total 180] Ratings 0 Comments 168 Invitations 0 Offline
S
P
Points 156 [Total 587] Ratings 2 Comments 136 Invitations 0 Online
S
Points 85 [Total 87] Ratings 5 Comments 35 Invitations 0 Offline
S
L
P
P
P
Points 58 [Total 4017] Ratings 0 Comments 58 Invitations 0 Offline
S
P
P
Points 53 [Total 948] Ratings 1 Comments 43 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 40 [Total 40] Ratings 4 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 24 [Total 96] Ratings 0 Comments 24 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 10 [Total 10] Ratings 1 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 10 [Total 10] Ratings 0 Comments 0 Invitations 1 Offline
* Excludes moderators and previous
winners (Include)
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | © Purple Inc.