You have new items in your feed. Click to view.
Question and answer
Those who argue that judges should practice judicial restraint maintain that judges should (Points : 1) overturn the will of the majority if they believe the majority to be wrong.
allow democratic majorities to tyrannize minorities because they did so through their democratically elected legislators. simply interpret the law and not make it. never overturn precedent.
Those who argue that judges should practice judicial restraint maintain that judges should simply interpret the law and not make it.
Expert answered|thederby|Points 1519|
Question
Asked 10/14/2012 12:16:41 PM
0 Answers/Comments
Get an answer
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
Gideon v. Wainwright overturned (Points : 1) Powell v. Alabama. Roe v. Wade. Mapp v. Ohio. Betts v. Brady
Weegy: Gideon v. Wainwright overturned -> Betts v. Brady (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 10/14/2012 12:28:45 PM
0 Answers/Comments
25,811,078 questions answered
Weegy Stuff
S
P
L
Points 634 [Total 1384] Ratings 3 Comments 604 Invitations 0 Offline
S
L
P
P
P
Points 435 [Total 3183] Ratings 0 Comments 435 Invitations 0 Offline
S
P
Points 379 [Total 638] Ratings 1 Comments 369 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 372 [Total 793] Ratings 2 Comments 352 Invitations 0 Online
S
L
P
P
P
Points 112 [Total 3816] Ratings 0 Comments 112 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 88 [Total 227] Ratings 0 Comments 88 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 27 [Total 27] Ratings 0 Comments 27 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 21 [Total 71] Ratings 2 Comments 1 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 10 [Total 10] Ratings 1 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Online
S
1
L
L
P
R
P
L
P
P
R
Points 8 [Total 12606] Ratings 0 Comments 8 Invitations 0 Offline
* Excludes moderators and previous
winners (Include)
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | © Purple Inc.