Notice: Payments for answers will end 4/10/2017. Click for more info.
Question and answer
Question not found
Ask a question
Not a good answer? Get an answer now. (Free)
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
n the case of _________, the Supreme Court ruled that in assessing the admissibility of new and unique scientific tests the trial judge did not have to rely solely on concept of "general acceptance.
Question
Expert Answered
Updated 10/16/2015 4:45:42 PM
1 Answer/Comment
In the case of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc., the Supreme Court ruled that in assessing the admissibility of new and unique scientific tests, the trial judge did not have to rely solely on concept of "general acceptance."
Added 10/16/2015 4:45:40 PM
This answer has been added to the Weegy Knowledgebase
27,402,383 questions answered
Popular Conversations
Weegy Stuff
S
P
Points 114 [Total 765] Ratings 0 Comments 114 Invitations 0 Offline
S
P
P
L
P
P
Points 54 [Total 1722] Ratings 0 Comments 54 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 21 [Total 21] Ratings 2 Comments 1 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 20 [Total 20] Ratings 2 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Online
S
Points 3 [Total 14] Ratings 0 Comments 3 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 2 [Total 2] Ratings 0 Comments 2 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 2 [Total 2] Ratings 0 Comments 2 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 2 [Total 2] Ratings 0 Comments 2 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 1 [Total 1] Ratings 0 Comments 1 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 1 [Total 1] Ratings 0 Comments 1 Invitations 0 Offline
* Excludes moderators and previous
winners (Include)
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | © Purple Inc.