Question and answer
Niday,J.(2008) The war aginst terror as war against the constitution
This essay examines rhetorical dynamics in the 2004 US Supreme Court case Hamdi v. Rumsfeld. News reports suggested the court split 8-1 or 6-3. However, case texts show substantive disagreements created a 4-2-2-1 split in the court. [ Moreover, while the justices on the bench split into four camps rather than two, those camps were not defined along ideological lines. This essay argues that
pragmatism, the legal philosophy that held sway in the case, achieved practical expediency at the expense of judicial and constitutional coherency. In the end, the court found a majority through neither persuasion nor principled conviction but, rather, through reluctant compromise in order to achieve a partial resolution rather than none. In other words, argumentation failed and consensus followed from necessity rather than persuasion. The essay explores the question of whether constitutionally guaranteed civil liberties were violated in the ruling. ]
Expert answered|bongche|Points 3366|
Question
Asked 10/24/2012 8:01:48 PM
0 Answers/Comments
Get an answer
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
23,845,162 questions answered
Weegy Stuff
S
Points 171 [Total 568] Ratings 0 Comments 171 Invitations 0 Online
S
P
P
Points 142 [Total 949] Ratings 0 Comments 142 Invitations 0 Offline
S
1
L
L
P
R
P
L
P
Points 106 [Total 11279] Ratings 0 Comments 106 Invitations 0 Online
S
L
P
Points 46 [Total 2114] Ratings 0 Comments 46 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 7 [Total 17] Ratings 0 Comments 7 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 4 [Total 904] Ratings 0 Comments 4 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 4 [Total 4] Ratings 0 Comments 4 Invitations 0 Offline
S
R
Points 2 [Total 438] Ratings 0 Comments 2 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 2 [Total 2] Ratings 0 Comments 2 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 1 [Total 2] Ratings 0 Comments 1 Invitations 0 Offline
* Excludes moderators and previous
winners (Include)