You have new items in your feed. Click to view.
Question and answer
Deductive arguments should never be characterized as inferences
List of options? Without them, my guess for this question is "either valid or invalid".
Get an answer
Original conversation
User: A valid argument is one that, if its premises are accepted as true, has a true conclusion

User: A valid argument is one that, if its premises are accepted as true, has a false conclusion

User: Deductive arguments should never be characterized as inferences

Weegy: List of options? Without them, my guess for this question is "either valid or invalid".
rawrse|Points 10|

User: Deductive arguments should never be characterized as valid

Weegy: Deductive arguments should never be characterized as proofs. Deductive arguments may be incorrect depending on the premise. If the premise is false naturally what follows may be incorrect as well. [ Source: ]
eturker|Points 1441|

User: what is the meaning of proofs

User: Deductive arguments should never be characterized as sound

Weegy: Deductive arguments should never be characterized as proofs. Deductive arguments may be incorrect depending on the premise. If the premise is false naturally what follows may be incorrect as well. [ Source: ]
eturker|Points 1441|

User: Deductive arguments should never be characterized as proofs

Weegy: List of options? Without them, my guess for this question is "either valid or invalid".
rawrse|Points 10|

User: 10 is less than 100; 100 is less than 1,000; consequently, 10 is less than 1,000" is an example of a sound deductive argument.

User: A sound argument is a valid deductive argument with actually _false__________________ premises

User: A sound argument is a valid deductive argument with actually true premises

Question
Asked 2/7/2012 4:23:45 PM
Updated 5/30/2013 9:25:30 PM
1 Answer/Comment
New answers
Rating
0
a true conclusion
Added 5/30/2013 9:25:30 PM
Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
When I once visited Texas, it was hot. So the next time I visit Texas, it will be hot" is an example of a valid inductive argument
Weegy: No, it would be a Deductive reasoning since your premise is the last time you visited Texas and you based on that to make your conclusion. User: One way to make an inductive argument stronger is to offer more reasons to support the conclusion Weegy: That is true. (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 2/7/2012 3:50:12 PM
0 Answers/Comments
Inductive arguments should never be characterized as strong? User: Inductive arguments should never be characterized as weak? User: When I once visited Texas, it was hot. So the next time I visit Texas, it will be hot" is an example of a sound inductive argument.
Weegy: True. User: "When I once visited Texas, it was hot. So the next time I visit Texas, it will be hot" is an example of a valid inductive argument. Weegy: Yes, its true. When I once visited Texas, it was hot. So the next time I visit Texas, it will be hot" is an example of a valid inductive argument. (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 2/7/2012 3:44:27 PM
0 Answers/Comments
When I once visited Texas, it was hot. So the next time I visit Texas, it will be hot" is an example of a sound deductive argument
Weegy: deductive argument User: Inductive arguments should never be characterized as Weegy: the truth, factual. (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 2/7/2012 3:58:46 PM
0 Answers/Comments
25,971,147 questions answered
Popular Conversations
x 3(x 2 + 5x + 1) User: Simplify 8 + 3{x - 2[x + 5(x + 3)]}. User: ...
Weegy: -7(8 + k) (-7)(8) + (-7)(k) = -56 - 7k User: Find the product. -7(8 + k) Weegy: -7(8 + k) (-7)(8) + ...
8/29/2016 8:46:50 AM| 2 Answers
Communication is considered ethical if it ...
8/29/2016 10:21:58 AM| 2 Answers
-4+-4+-4 User: Integers contain the whole numbers. True False
Weegy: True, Integers contain the whole numbers. User: 5*-4= User: 5(-4)= User: Simplify (3/10)(-5/9). Weegy: ...
8/29/2016 11:05:23 AM| 2 Answers
Convert the fraction to higher terms. Enter the value of the missing ...
Weegy: Convert the fraction to higher terms.the value of the missing numerator. 1/4 = 7/28 User: 110.2 square yards ...
8/29/2016 9:11:35 PM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
Points 793 [Total 864] Ratings 5 Comments 743 Invitations 0 Offline
S
L
P
P
P
P
Points 699 [Total 3954] Ratings 0 Comments 699 Invitations 0 Offline
S
1
L
Points 671 [Total 1505] Ratings 3 Comments 641 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 151 [Total 151] Ratings 0 Comments 151 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 58 [Total 285] Ratings 0 Comments 58 Invitations 0 Offline
S
L
P
P
P
Points 46 [Total 3862] Ratings 0 Comments 46 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 40 [Total 45] Ratings 0 Comments 0 Invitations 4 Offline
S
Points 15 [Total 15] Ratings 0 Comments 5 Invitations 1 Offline
S
L
C
Points 11 [Total 4491] Ratings 1 Comments 1 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 10 [Total 10] Ratings 1 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Offline
* Excludes moderators and previous
winners (Include)
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | © Purple Inc.