Question and answer
How do you know whether you can trust Wikipedia or another online resource?
When doing a information search, you must not only rely with one source. You will need to at least browse or read other web pages with the same information, that is the only way of there are wrong information on that page. [ Furthermore, most of information sources are reliable, you just need to comprehend what is written on the site and not just mere copying and pasting it on your projects or
research works. ]
Get an answer
Original conversation
User: How do you know whether you can trust Wikipedia or another online resource?

Weegy: When doing a information search, you must not only rely with one source. You will need to at least browse or read other web pages with the same information, that is the only way of there are wrong information on that page. [ Furthermore, most of information sources are reliable, you just need to comprehend what is written on the site and not just mere copying and pasting it on your projects or research works. ]
samn|Points 902|

User: How do you know whether you can trust Wikipedia or another online resource?

Weegy: When doing a information search, you must not only rely with one source. You will need to at least browse or read other web pages with the same information, that is the only way of there are wrong information on that page. [ Furthermore, most of information sources are reliable, you just need to comprehend what is written on the site and not just mere copying and pasting it on your projects or research works. ]
samn|Points 902|

Question
Asked 4/17/2012 11:51:13 AM
Updated 12/5/2012 4:50:41 PM
1 Answer/Comment
New answers
Rating
0
The answer to your question , On how you can trust Wikipedia or another online resource , is that fact Generally, you can say you can trust something if it is repeated in another source you trust. (e.g. the New York Times, BBC news). A measure of trustworthyness of sources like the New York Times or BBC news is their track record; they are known for fact-checking their entries. At times they can still miss the boat and report something in error. The more trusted sources that report something independently off eachother, the more trust you can place in it. As for WIKIPEDIA , The articles with a lock at top-right corner can be trusted...like in the link below...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft

The articles with no lock on the top right corner can be or cannot be trusted...like in the link below...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reliance_Industr…
Added 12/5/2012 4:50:41 PM
Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
Do you think the concentration of media ownership limits the number of voices in the marketplace? Explain.
Weegy: A key idea of media democracy is that the concentration of media ownership in recent decades in the hands of a few corporations and conglomerates has led to a narrowing of the range of voices and opinions being expressed in the mass media; to an [ increase in the commercialization of news and information; to a hollowing out of the news media’s ability to conduct investigative reporting and act as the public watchdog; and to an increase of emphasis on the bottom line, which prioritizes infotainment and celebrity news over informative discourse. Cultural studies have investigated changes in the increasing tendency of modern mass media in the field of politics to blur and confuse the boundaries between journalism, entertainment, public relations and advertising.[5] A diverse range of information providers is necessary so that viewers, readers and listeners receive a broad spectrum of information from varying sources that is not tightly controlled, biased and filtered.[6] Access to different sources of information prevents deliberate attempts at misinformation and allows the public to make their own judgments and form their own opinions.[7] This is critical as individuals must be in a position to decide and act autonomously for there to be a functioning democracy.[8] While it is vital to be able to scrutinize the choices made by media providers in terms of what information is included and excluded,[9] individuals possess distinctive knowledge, habits and interests that affect what media they will view and how they will be affected by the media they are exposed to.[10] The content is only one factor among many others that will shape an individual’s powers of judgment.[11] This concentration has been encouraged by government deregulation and neo-liberal trade policies. For example, the U.S. Telecommunications Act of 1996 discarded most media ownership rules that were previously in place, leading to massive consolidation in the telecommunications industry. Over ... (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 4/16/2012 3:56:42 PM
0 Answers/Comments
Do you think the concentration of media ownership limits the number of voices in the marketplace? Explain.
Weegy: : The concentration of media ownership limits the number of voices in the marketplace by restricting the opinions published to those that agree with the editor/owner/voice/mission statement of the publication. [ Chances are, even though a single company owns a large number of publications, there is not going to be a wide variety of voices and social groups represented. The possibility is also quite high that the voices represented are those of the more wealthy social groups. I think we do need rules limiting media ownership, simply to give everyone a chance to be heard in the media. More often than not, we are listening to the "popular opinion" and those who do not yet have an opinion about certain subjects have very little to base their ideas on. ] (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 4/16/2012 3:52:26 PM
0 Answers/Comments
18,459,288 questions answered
Popular Conversations
In the poem "God's Grandeur," the phrase "nor can foot feel, being ...
Weegy: In the poem "God's Grandeur," the phrase "nor can foot feel, being shod" means: humans are out of touch with ...
11/27/2014 12:04:03 AM| 1 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
1
L
P
C
1
P
C
1
L
P
C
1
Points 2939 [Total 14649]| Ratings 11| Comments 2829| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 1472 [Total 3758]| Ratings 0| Comments 1472| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 847 [Total 879]| Ratings 1| Comments 837| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
1
L
P
P
L
P
Points 784 [Total 14158]| Ratings 0| Comments 784| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 777 [Total 1298]| Ratings 6| Comments 717| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
L
Points 273 [Total 6667]| Ratings 0| Comments 273| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 163 [Total 1459]| Ratings 3| Comments 133| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 109 [Total 109]| Ratings 1| Comments 99| Invitations 0|Online
S
Points 50 [Total 50]| Ratings 0| Comments 0| Invitations 5|Offline
S
Points 46 [Total 46]| Ratings 3| Comments 6| Invitations 1|Offline
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2014 Purple Inc.