You have new items in your feed. Click to view.
Question and answer
John C. Calhoun proposed the following to assert states’ right: (Points : 1) secession from the union. the right of the states to take up arms against the national government.
the right of states to tax the national government. nullification and interposition.
Calhoun proposed the following to assert states? right of : nullification and interposition.
Get an answer
Original conversation
User: In Ronald Reagan s version of new federalism, the goal was to return power back to the states through

User: John C. Calhoun proposed the following to assert states’ right: (Points : 1) secession from the union. the right of the states to take up arms against the national government. the right of states to tax the national government. nullification and interposition.

Weegy: Calhoun proposed the following to assert states? right of : nullification and interposition.
lhyn29lhyn|Points 550|

User: Under a Home Rule Charter, local authority is (Points : 1) usually established by the local voters. never established by the state’s legislature. never established by the state’s constitution. usually established by a provision in the state’s constitution or granted by the state’s legislature.

Weegy: The answer is "usually established by a provision in the state’s constitution ".
Expert answered|bonaxle|Points 115|

Question
Asked 8/13/2012 9:26:22 PM
0 Answers/Comments
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
In Missouri v. Holland, the Supreme Court rejected Missouri’s argument that the regulation of game was a state right despite a treaty between the national government and Canada to protect migratory birds because (Points : 1) it was a matter of interstate commerce. failure to protect the birds would harm relations with Canada. a treaty is the supreme law of the land and as such it trumps states’ rights. foreign policy always supersedes states’ rights
Weegy: The answer is foreign policy always supersedes states’ rights (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Updated 7/23/2014 11:18:04 AM
1 Answer/Comment
In Missouri v. Holland, the Supreme Court rejected Missouri’s argument that the regulation of game was a state right despite a treaty between the national government and Canada to protect migratory birds because: a treaty is the supreme law of the land and as such it trumps states rights.

Added 7/23/2014 11:18:04 AM
This answer has been added to the Weegy Knowledgebase
27,038,363 questions answered
Popular Conversations
Weegy Stuff
S
P
P
L
Points 474 [Total 1243] Ratings 2 Comments 454 Invitations 0 Offline
S
P
P
L
P
P
Points 419 [Total 2393] Ratings 1 Comments 409 Invitations 0 Offline
S
P
P
L
P
Points 226 [Total 1440] Ratings 0 Comments 226 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 30 [Total 30] Ratings 3 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 14 [Total 14] Ratings 0 Comments 14 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 12 [Total 112] Ratings 1 Comments 2 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 12 [Total 22] Ratings 1 Comments 2 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 5 [Total 5] Ratings 0 Comments 5 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 4 [Total 4] Ratings 0 Comments 4 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 2 [Total 2] Ratings 0 Comments 2 Invitations 0 Offline
* Excludes moderators and previous
winners (Include)
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | © Purple Inc.