Notice: Payments for answers will end 4/10/2017. Click for more info.
You have new items in your feed. Click to view.
Question and answer
Q: Describe two ways to check that communication has been understood by all involved
A: Rule 1: PLAY BACK for confirmation Simple, you ask for confirmation. You say "let me see if I have understood correctly, you are saying that ..." and you rephrase what the speaker said. [ If this "play back" version is acknowledged as being correct by the original speaker, then you have a greater degree of confidence in you own understanding. For any viewpoint/message/decision, there should be a
clear, concise and verified statement of what was said; without this someone will get it wrong. Rule 2: WRITE BACK for confidence But do not stop there. If your time and effort depend upon it, you should write it down and send it to everyone involved as a double check. This has several advantages: Further clarification - is this what you thought we agreed? Consistency check - the act of writing may highlight defects/omissions A formal stage - a statement of the accepted position provides a spring board from which to proceed Evidence - hindsight often blurs previous ignorance and people often fail to recall their previous errors Rule 3: GIVE BACKground for context When speaking yourself, you can often counter for possible problems by adding information, and so providing a broader context in which your words can be understood. Thus, there is less scope for alternative interpretations since fewer are consistent. When others are speaking, you should deliberately ask questions yourself to establish the context in which they are thinking. When others are speaking, you should deliberately ask questions yourself to establish the context in which they are thinking. ]
Get an answer
Original conversation
User: Describe two ways to check that communication has been understood by all involved





Weegy: Rule 1: PLAY BACK for confirmation Simple, you ask for confirmation. You say "let me see if I have understood correctly, you are saying that ..." and you rephrase what the speaker said. [ If this "play back" version is acknowledged as being correct by the original speaker, then you have a greater degree of confidence in you own understanding. For any viewpoint/message/decision, there should be a clear, concise and verified statement of what was said; without this someone will get it wrong. Rule 2: WRITE BACK for confidence But do not stop there. If your time and effort depend upon it, you should write it down and send it to everyone involved as a double check. This has several advantages: Further clarification - is this what you thought we agreed? Consistency check - the act of writing may highlight defects/omissions A formal stage - a statement of the accepted position provides a spring board from which to proceed Evidence - hindsight often blurs previous ignorance and people often fail to recall their previous errors Rule 3: GIVE BACKground for context When speaking yourself, you can often counter for possible problems by adding information, and so providing a broader context in which your words can be understood. Thus, there is less scope for alternative interpretations since fewer are consistent. When others are speaking, you should deliberately ask questions yourself to establish the context in which they are thinking. When others are speaking, you should deliberately ask questions yourself to establish the context in which they are thinking. ]
Expert answered|selymi|Points 7972|

User: Give two reasons why it is important to observe the reactions of ano individual using the service when you are communicating with them



Weegy: Several cases the service user could not able to respond while communicating with us buttheir body language, gesture or expression. [ And it’s important to view reactions, because onlyabout 70-80% of communication is verbal, meaning that we are gong to be missing out on a large part of communication if we aren't paying attention to peoples facial and bodily reactions. ]
Expert answered|rickjames|Points 80|

Question
Asked 4/17/2012 8:54:18 AM
0 Answers/Comments
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
26,639,926 questions answered
Popular Conversations
Suppose the U.S. can produce cars for a lower opportunity cost than ...
Weegy: Suppose the U.S. can produce cars for a lower opportunity cost than Japan while Japan has a comparative ...
2/13/2018 7:30:37 PM| 4 Answers
What's the simplified form of 2x + 3 x + 5? A. x 8 B. ...
Weegy: (2x^2)(3x^2) = 6x4 User: Simplify this expression: 13 + (–12) – (–5) = ? A. –6 B. 6 C. –30 ...
2/12/2018 11:53:02 PM| 3 Answers
Solve this equation: 80 = 3y + 2y + 4 + 1. A. y = 1/5 B. ...
Weegy: 80 = 3y + 2y + 4 + 1 80 = 5y + 5 80 - 5 = 5y -5y = -75 y = 15 User: Solve the inequality: 12p + 7 > 139 ...
2/14/2018 2:20:46 PM| 3 Answers
Solve the equation: 12y = 132. A. y = 11 B. y = 144 ...
Weegy: 12y = 132 User: Solve this equation: 2s + s + 12 = 132. A. s = 40 B. s = –30 C. s = 9 D. ...
2/14/2018 2:32:47 PM| 3 Answers
Write 10 5/12 as an equivalent improper fraction.
Weegy: 10 5/12 in improper fraction form is 125/12. User: Subtract: 8 – 4 1/2
2/15/2018 12:27:39 AM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
Points 344 [Total 347] Ratings 10 Comments 214 Invitations 3 Offline
S
Points 89 [Total 89] Ratings 0 Comments 19 Invitations 7 Offline
S
P
Points 41 [Total 85] Ratings 1 Comments 31 Invitations 0 Offline
S
P
L
P
P
Points 39 [Total 232] Ratings 0 Comments 39 Invitations 0 Offline
S
1
L
L
P
R
P
L
P
P
R
Points 28 [Total 12639] Ratings 0 Comments 28 Invitations 0 Online
S
Points 20 [Total 20] Ratings 2 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Offline
S
P
Points 13 [Total 30] Ratings 0 Comments 13 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 11 [Total 11] Ratings 1 Comments 1 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 10 [Total 10] Ratings 0 Comments 0 Invitations 1 Offline
S
Points 5 [Total 5] Ratings 0 Comments 5 Invitations 0 Offline
* Excludes moderators and previous
winners (Include)
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | © Purple Inc.