Question and answer
Many organizations have rules that are supposed to prevent employee theft. Which of the following is the most logical reason employees might steal from their employer? a. The definition of employee
theft depends on the organization.b. Some people are more likely to engage in employee theft than others.c. They feel the organization does not treat them as well as they deserve.d. They needed to steal to support themselves or their family.
d. They needed to steal to support themselves or their family.
Expert answered|rhey22787|Points 242|
Question
Asked 8/5/2012 5:35:47 PM
0 Answers/Comments
Get an answer
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
The Police Commissioner is under pressure to solve a murder and offers $100,000 for information leading to an arrest and conviction of the culprit. Mary suspects her neighbor, Phoebe, is the guilty party and calls Bob, a friend and police officer, with her suspicions. When Bob visits Phoebe, she unsuccessfully resists arrest, though Bob is severely injured. Phoebe is ultimately convicted of the murder and assaulting Bob. Mary insists all the reward money belongs to her. Is she right?
Weegy: She gave information leading to the arrest and conviction of the subject. [ She gets the reward (btw no police commissioner is going to offer any reward, let alone $100,000) The policy is that the police do not, and actually cannot legally, offer a reward in most states. The reward and moneys posted have to be from private businesses or individuals. City, taxpayers, money cannot be used. It is also against the law for officers to receive the benefit of rewards. They are public servants, not PI's or bounty hunters. Of course I agree, It is only fair and it is truly the only way to get information from a posted reward. If you do not hold up your end of the reward bargain then rewards will become useless in helping to apprehend and convict offenders. ] (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 7/30/2012 8:08:06 AM
0 Answers/Comments
The Police Commissioner is under pressure to solve a murder and offers $100,000 for information leading to an arrest and conviction of the culprit. Mary suspects her neighbor, Phoebe, is the guilty party and calls Bob, a friend and police officer, with her suspicions. When Bob visits Phoebe, she unsuccessfully resists arrest, though Bob is severely injured. Phoebe is ultimately convicted of the murder and assaulting Bob. Mary insists all the reward money belongs to her. Is she right? What is ...
Weegy: She gave information leading to the arrest and conviction of the subject. [ [ She gets the reward (btw no police commissioner is going to offer any reward, let alone $100,000) The policy is that the police do not, and actually cannot legally, offer a reward in most states. The reward and moneys posted have to be from private businesses or individuals. City, taxpayers, money cannot be used. It is also against the law for officers to receive the benefit of rewards. They are public servants, not PI's or bounty hunters. Of course I agree, It is only fair and it is truly the only way to get information from a posted reward. If you do not hold up your end of the reward bargain then rewards will become useless in helping to apprehend and convict offenders SUnshine all Day :) ] User: can you show proof of the policy Weegy: I cannot, Thanks SUnshine all Day :) (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 7/30/2012 8:15:33 AM
0 Answers/Comments
(2) Do you agree with the policy consideration behind the relevant rule? That any promises made by any parties must be supported by legally sufficient and bargained for consideration that is something of value received or promised to convince a person to make a deal. WHY/WHY NOT?
Weegy: Policy considerations may become relevant to the making of The policy consideration behind the relevant rule is; if a judicial decision when the decision cannot be made by reference to established rules, [ [ whether grounded in precedent or even in statute. The Court will then consider the values and policy arguments that are relevant to the articulation of the potential rule (or principle). The Court must make an evaluation of them as a preliminary to articulating the rule to be applied in the instant case. The rule will have an application that extends beyond the parties to the case. Just how far it will extend depends upon its terms, its nature, and subject matter. ] ] (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 7/30/2012 9:08:24 AM
0 Answers/Comments
Do you agree with this policy?The policy behind the relevant rule is that the police cannot legally offer a reward because they are public service employees. The reward money would have to come from somewhere other than the police department or police commissioner. Why/why not?
Weegy: i don't agree with this policy its not fair to reward someone from sources other than official police department . [ because it's not legal so i dont agree with this policy! they can make request to thier senior officials to reward them but from other external sources its unfair ] (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 7/30/2012 9:35:21 AM
0 Answers/Comments
21,041,118 questions answered
Popular Conversations
The graph of y = 2 x and the graph of y = 2 -x are symmetrical. What ...
Weegy: x^2+y = 3 is the answer. User: Find the roots. 2x 2 + 7x - 15 =0 User: Solve for x. 8x 2 - 5 = 11 Weegy: ...
5/21/2015 9:51:26 AM| 4 Answers
What is the equation of a line that passes through points (0, 4) and ...
Weegy: The equation of a line that passes through points (0, 4) and (-4, -8) is y= 3x + 4 User: Which of the ...
5/21/2015 10:31:24 AM| 4 Answers
Which of the following statements about the coordinate plane are ...
Weegy: A marathon runner runs at the rate of 9 mph for the complete course. A track man runs at 12 mph. If together ...
5/21/2015 1:22:31 PM| 3 Answers
Cuban dictator
Weegy: What is your question about Cuban dictator? Please be more specific. User: Group formed to promote democracy, ...
5/21/2015 6:55:14 AM| 2 Answers
Find the product. 3y 2 z(2y 2 z 4yz - y z) User: 3y 2 z(2y 2 z + ...
Weegy: y/3 + 9 = 9 y/3 = 9 - 9; y/3 = 0; y = 0 * 3; y = 0 User: Find the product. -mnp(3m - 5n + 7p)
5/21/2015 8:05:20 AM| 2 Answers
Simplify. (x 6)2 · x -3 User: How many subsets of at least two ...
Weegy: The number of subsets of n elemnets = 2^n but this also includes a null set, because a null set is a subset of ...
5/21/2015 10:24:42 AM| 2 Answers
When Japan proceeded to invade Manchuria,
Weegy: False. the national socialist party for china would have been Sun Yat Sens koumintang (KMT) and it had been ...
5/21/2015 10:59:37 AM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
Points 706 [Total 1236]| Ratings 2| Comments 686| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
Points 441 [Total 833]| Ratings 1| Comments 431| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 428 [Total 436]| Ratings 1| Comments 418| Invitations 0|Online
S
P
C
L
P
L
1
P
P
1
P
1
Points 204 [Total 8950]| Ratings 0| Comments 204| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
P
Points 92 [Total 2569]| Ratings 0| Comments 92| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
L
Points 67 [Total 8250]| Ratings 0| Comments 67| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 55 [Total 3809]| Ratings 2| Comments 35| Invitations 0|Online
S
Points 33 [Total 53]| Ratings 0| Comments 33| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
1
R
Points 20 [Total 1307]| Ratings 0| Comments 20| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 14 [Total 14]| Ratings 0| Comments 14| Invitations 0|Offline
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2015 Purple Inc.