Question and answer
Many organizations have rules that are supposed to prevent employee theft. Which of the following is the most logical reason employees might steal from their employer? a. The definition of employee
theft depends on the organization.b. Some people are more likely to engage in employee theft than others.c. They feel the organization does not treat them as well as they deserve.d. They needed to steal to support themselves or their family.
d. They needed to steal to support themselves or their family.
Expert answered|rhey22787|Points 242|
Question
Asked 8/5/2012 5:35:47 PM
0 Answers/Comments
Get an answer
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
The Police Commissioner is under pressure to solve a murder and offers $100,000 for information leading to an arrest and conviction of the culprit. Mary suspects her neighbor, Phoebe, is the guilty party and calls Bob, a friend and police officer, with her suspicions. When Bob visits Phoebe, she unsuccessfully resists arrest, though Bob is severely injured. Phoebe is ultimately convicted of the murder and assaulting Bob. Mary insists all the reward money belongs to her. Is she right?
Weegy: She gave information leading to the arrest and conviction of the subject. [ She gets the reward (btw no police commissioner is going to offer any reward, let alone $100,000) The policy is that the police do not, and actually cannot legally, offer a reward in most states. The reward and moneys posted have to be from private businesses or individuals. City, taxpayers, money cannot be used. It is also against the law for officers to receive the benefit of rewards. They are public servants, not PI's or bounty hunters. Of course I agree, It is only fair and it is truly the only way to get information from a posted reward. If you do not hold up your end of the reward bargain then rewards will become useless in helping to apprehend and convict offenders. ] (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 7/30/2012 8:08:06 AM
0 Answers/Comments
The Police Commissioner is under pressure to solve a murder and offers $100,000 for information leading to an arrest and conviction of the culprit. Mary suspects her neighbor, Phoebe, is the guilty party and calls Bob, a friend and police officer, with her suspicions. When Bob visits Phoebe, she unsuccessfully resists arrest, though Bob is severely injured. Phoebe is ultimately convicted of the murder and assaulting Bob. Mary insists all the reward money belongs to her. Is she right? What is ...
Weegy: She gave information leading to the arrest and conviction of the subject. [ [ She gets the reward (btw no police commissioner is going to offer any reward, let alone $100,000) The policy is that the police do not, and actually cannot legally, offer a reward in most states. The reward and moneys posted have to be from private businesses or individuals. City, taxpayers, money cannot be used. It is also against the law for officers to receive the benefit of rewards. They are public servants, not PI's or bounty hunters. Of course I agree, It is only fair and it is truly the only way to get information from a posted reward. If you do not hold up your end of the reward bargain then rewards will become useless in helping to apprehend and convict offenders SUnshine all Day :) ] User: can you show proof of the policy Weegy: I cannot, Thanks SUnshine all Day :) (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 7/30/2012 8:15:33 AM
0 Answers/Comments
(2) Do you agree with the policy consideration behind the relevant rule? That any promises made by any parties must be supported by legally sufficient and bargained for consideration that is something of value received or promised to convince a person to make a deal. WHY/WHY NOT?
Weegy: Policy considerations may become relevant to the making of The policy consideration behind the relevant rule is; if a judicial decision when the decision cannot be made by reference to established rules, [ [ whether grounded in precedent or even in statute. The Court will then consider the values and policy arguments that are relevant to the articulation of the potential rule (or principle). The Court must make an evaluation of them as a preliminary to articulating the rule to be applied in the instant case. The rule will have an application that extends beyond the parties to the case. Just how far it will extend depends upon its terms, its nature, and subject matter. ] ] (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 7/30/2012 9:08:24 AM
0 Answers/Comments
(2) Do you agree with the policy? That any promises made by any parties must be supported by legally sufficient and bargained for consideration that is something of value received or promised to convince a person to make a deal. WHY/WHY NOT?
Weegy: I somewhat agree. If a certain party makes a promise, it should be evaluated for its legality before it is put into effect. (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 7/30/2012 9:11:47 AM
0 Answers/Comments
Do you agree with this policy?The policy behind the relevant rule is that the police cannot legally offer a reward because they are public service employees. The reward money would have to come from somewhere other than the police department or police commissioner. Why/why not?
Weegy: Agree, doing it by yourself is much better than giving the task to others. User: Do you agree with this policy?The policy behind the relevant rule is that the police cannot legally offer a reward because they are public service employees. The reward money would have to come from somewhere other than the police department or police commissioner. Why/why not? Weegy: Agree, doing it by yourself is much better than giving the task to others. (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 7/30/2012 9:16:34 AM
0 Answers/Comments
19,802,239 questions answered
Popular Conversations
Find the product. (0.5n 5)2(10n 7) 3
Weegy: Is there a second part to this question? such as C= 0.25n User: Find the product. (y 2)5 · y 8 Weegy: IF ...
3/4/2015 10:51:00 AM| 3 Answers
Who, whom, whose, which, and that are used to introduce dependent ...
Weegy: Earthen- resembling earth. User: What question does the adverb clause answer? I'll agree to your proposal ...
3/4/2015 4:24:41 PM| 3 Answers
Pakistan’s economy is _______________ dominant. ...
Weegy: Pakistan’s economy is _______________ dominant. MANUFACTURING
3/4/2015 3:52:35 AM| 2 Answers
Which sentence uses epigraph correctly? My father always signs his ...
Weegy: your answer is b.Several downtown buildings have been marred with a racist epigraph. Anything else? User: ...
3/4/2015 8:20:11 AM| 2 Answers
Which word is a synonym for secret? ...
3/4/2015 8:48:42 AM| 2 Answers
80, 90, 85, 95, 90, 100, 95, 105, __, ___, ___
Weegy: e the next three numbers in the sequence is 100, 110 and 105. [smile] User: 5 - 6 - 8 = Weegy: 3-3 = 0 ...
3/4/2015 9:00:09 AM| 2 Answers
Find the product. (-4·3·2)2 User: Find the product. (n 3)2 · (n ...
Weegy: that is a factor what you need to know? User: Find the product. (n ^3)^2 · (n^ 5)^4
3/4/2015 10:31:32 AM| 2 Answers
10^6
Weegy: 2 * 10 = 20 User: (100)6
3/4/2015 10:43:28 AM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
P
L
P
P
P
Points 293 [Total 8179]| Ratings 0| Comments 293| Invitations 0|Offline
S
P
C
L
P
L
1
P
Points 131 [Total 7438]| Ratings 1| Comments 121| Invitations 0|Online
S
1
L
Points 94 [Total 1005]| Ratings 1| Comments 84| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
L
Points 79 [Total 7580]| Ratings 0| Comments 79| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 72 [Total 577]| Ratings 4| Comments 32| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 22 [Total 390]| Ratings 0| Comments 22| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 17 [Total 108]| Ratings 0| Comments 17| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 12 [Total 12]| Ratings 0| Comments 12| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 11 [Total 127]| Ratings 1| Comments 1| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 10 [Total 10]| Ratings 1| Comments 0| Invitations 0|Offline
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2014 Purple Inc.