You have new items in your feed. Click to view.
Question and answer
In the case of _________, the Supreme Court ruled that in assessing the admissibility of new and unique scientific tests, the trial judge did not have to rely solely on concept of "general
acceptance." (Points : 4) Michigan v. Tyler Frye v. United States Coppolino v. State Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc.
Expert answered|Airyna|Points 78|
Question
Asked 7/4/2012 3:01:07 PM
Updated 7/4/2012 3:47:36 PM
2 Answers/Comments
Get an answer
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments
Good answer
Added 7/4/2012 3:34:21 PM
Flagged by debnjerry
Please don't add comments just to say good answer. Add something of value to the conversations but correcting wrong answers or adding additional information.
Added 7/4/2012 3:47:36 PM
Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
The District Court ruled that the evidence did not meet the applicable "general acceptance" standard for the admission of expert testimony. Finally, the United States Supreme Court held that, under the Federal Rules of Evidence, not Frye, that the evidence did not meet the standard for admitting expert testimony in a federal trial. Which case? (Points : 4) Miranda v Arizona William v. Florida Wells v. Daubert Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Weegy: Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc. User: According to the courts any new evidence seized, resulting from unreasonably seized evidence, is also tainted and is not admissible in court. This is based on the: (Points : 4) Bad evidence doctrine Fruits of the poisonous tree doctrine Illegal seizure doctrine Unreasonable search doctrine Weegy: Stolen evidence is not admissible because it could be tampered with once it was stolen. User: According to the courts any new evidence seized, resulting from unreasonably seized evidence, is also tainted and is not admissible in court. This is based on the: (Points : 4) Bad evidence doctrine Fruits of the poisonous tree doctrine Illegal seizure doctrine Unreasonable search doctrine Weegy: Stolen evidence is not admissible because it could be tampered with once it was stolen. (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 7/4/2012 3:29:48 PM
0 Answers/Comments
The standard guideline for determining the judicial admissibility of scientific examination stemmed from which court ruling? (Points : 4) Mincy v. Arizona Kumbo Tire Co., Ltd. V. Carmichael Frye v. United States Coppolino v. State
Question
Not Answered
Updated 169 days ago|4/10/2016 2:14:53 PM
1 Answer/Comment
The standard guideline for determining the judicial admissibility of scientific examination stemmed from Frye v. United States.
Added 169 days ago|4/10/2016 2:14:53 PM
This answer has been confirmed as correct, not copied, and helpful.
Confirmed by Andrew. [4/11/2016 3:01:06 PM]
A(n) ___________ is a person who can demonstrate a particular skill or has knowledge in a trade or profession that will help the court determine the truth of the matter at issue. (Points : 4) Lay person Professional Witness Expert Witness Factual Witness
Question
Not Answered
Updated 12/31/2014 10:45:06 PM
1 Answer/Comment


An Expert Witness is a person who can demonstrate a particular skill or has knowledge in a trade or profession that will help the court determine the truth of the matter at issue.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expert_witness
Added 12/31/2014 10:45:06 PM
26,200,307 questions answered
Popular Conversations
7 × -11 User: 56 ÷ -7
9/25/2016 4:46:00 PM| 2 Answers
Expressed powers are
Weegy: Strict Constructionist User: People who are against capital punishment argue that it violates the
9/25/2016 9:43:37 PM| 2 Answers
Find the product. y^5 · y^3
Weegy: y^5 · y^3 = y^8 User: Find the product. (-4·3·2)^2 User: Find the product. (fg)^9
9/26/2016 10:59:57 AM| 2 Answers
IAB stands for
Weegy: what can i help you?
9/25/2016 12:21:25 AM| 1 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
P
P
P
P
P
L
Points 964 [Total 5036] Ratings 2 Comments 944 Invitations 0 Offline
S
P
1
L
Points 713 [Total 1593] Ratings 5 Comments 663 Invitations 0 Online
S
Points 205 [Total 499] Ratings 0 Comments 205 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 105 [Total 105] Ratings 0 Comments 105 Invitations 0 Offline
S
L
P
Points 103 [Total 1215] Ratings 0 Comments 103 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 72 [Total 72] Ratings 0 Comments 72 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 30 [Total 30] Ratings 3 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Offline
S
L
Points 25 [Total 4250] Ratings 1 Comments 15 Invitations 0 Offline
S
L
P
P
P
Points 14 [Total 3876] Ratings 0 Comments 14 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 10 [Total 10] Ratings 1 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Offline
* Excludes moderators and previous
winners (Include)
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | © Purple Inc.