Question and answer
In the case of _________, the Supreme Court ruled that in assessing the admissibility of new and unique scientific tests, the trial judge did not have to rely solely on concept of "general
acceptance." (Points : 4) Michigan v. Tyler Frye v. United States Coppolino v. State Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc.
Expert answered|Airyna|Points 78|
Question
Asked 7/4/2012 3:01:07 PM
Updated 7/4/2012 3:47:36 PM
2 Answers/Comments
Get an answer
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments
Good answer
Added 7/4/2012 3:34:21 PM
Flagged by debnjerry
Please don't add comments just to say good answer. Add something of value to the conversations but correcting wrong answers or adding additional information.
Added 7/4/2012 3:47:36 PM
Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
The District Court ruled that the evidence did not meet the applicable "general acceptance" standard for the admission of expert testimony. Finally, the United States Supreme Court held that, under the Federal Rules of Evidence, not Frye, that the evidence did not meet the standard for admitting expert testimony in a federal trial. Which case? (Points : 4) Miranda v Arizona William v. Florida Wells v. Daubert Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Weegy: Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc. User: According to the courts any new evidence seized, resulting from unreasonably seized evidence, is also tainted and is not admissible in court. This is based on the: (Points : 4) Bad evidence doctrine Fruits of the poisonous tree doctrine Illegal seizure doctrine Unreasonable search doctrine Weegy: Stolen evidence is not admissible because it could be tampered with once it was stolen. User: According to the courts any new evidence seized, resulting from unreasonably seized evidence, is also tainted and is not admissible in court. This is based on the: (Points : 4) Bad evidence doctrine Fruits of the poisonous tree doctrine Illegal seizure doctrine Unreasonable search doctrine Weegy: Stolen evidence is not admissible because it could be tampered with once it was stolen. (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 7/4/2012 3:29:48 PM
0 Answers/Comments
A(n) ___________ is a person who can demonstrate a particular skill or has knowledge in a trade or profession that will help the court determine the truth of the matter at issue. (Points : 4) Lay person Professional Witness Expert Witness Factual Witness
Question
Not Answered
Updated 107 days ago|12/31/2014 10:45:06 PM
1 Answer/Comment


An Expert Witness is a person who can demonstrate a particular skill or has knowledge in a trade or profession that will help the court determine the truth of the matter at issue.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expert_witness
Added 107 days ago|12/31/2014 10:45:06 PM
20,457,184 questions answered
Popular Conversations
Solve 2x^2 + x - 6 = 0 User: Solve |4x - 8| User: Solve the ...
Weegy: 2x + 1 User: Solve |x| > 5 User: Solve 7x - 4 = 5x + 15 for x.
4/17/2015 9:42:20 AM| 3 Answers
Which of the following statements uses the commutative property of ...
Weegy: C.2 + (3 + 4) = 2 + (4 + 3) User: Simplify (12ab)(3t). Weegy: Answer is 36abt User: Simplify (4x) · mn · 15 ...
4/17/2015 10:33:35 AM| 3 Answers
5x 2 y and 7x y 2 are like terms. True False
Weegy: 7x + 5x = 12x User: Simplify -10x - 2x + 3x. -9x 9x 11x Weegy: -10x - 2x + 3x = -9x User: Simplify 5(x ...
4/17/2015 10:43:33 AM| 3 Answers
Solve for x. 4x + 3 < 9
4/17/2015 10:16:12 AM| 2 Answers
Judging and evaluating advertisements requires critical thinking ...
Weegy: truth in advertising laws ensure the accuracy of information in advertisements User: what is an inference
4/17/2015 10:42:02 AM| 2 Answers
what is an antecedent
Weegy: In grammar, an antecedent is an expression (word, phrase, clause, etc.) that gives its meaning to a proform ...
4/17/2015 12:45:24 PM| 2 Answers
Which two superpowers engaged in an arms race during the cold war as ...
Weegy: Which two superpowers engaged in an arms race during the cold war as they competed with each other to acquire ...
4/17/2015 3:21:30 PM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
Points 712 [Total 2289]| Ratings 1| Comments 702| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 605 [Total 1172]| Ratings 2| Comments 585| Invitations 0|Offline
S
P
C
L
P
L
1
P
P
1
Points 217 [Total 8094]| Ratings 2| Comments 197| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 164 [Total 164]| Ratings 0| Comments 164| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
1
R
Points 101 [Total 1173]| Ratings 1| Comments 91| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 101 [Total 3704]| Ratings 0| Comments 101| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
L
Points 72 [Total 8066]| Ratings 0| Comments 72| Invitations 0|Online
S
Points 47 [Total 47]| Ratings 1| Comments 37| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
1
Points 43 [Total 3484]| Ratings 1| Comments 33| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 22 [Total 22]| Ratings 0| Comments 22| Invitations 0|Offline
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2015 Purple Inc.