Question and answer
In the case of _________, the Supreme Court ruled that in assessing the admissibility of new and unique scientific tests, the trial judge did not have to rely solely on concept of "general
acceptance." (Points : 4) Michigan v. Tyler Frye v. United States Coppolino v. State Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc.
Expert answered|Airyna|Points 78|
Question
Asked 7/4/2012 3:01:07 PM
Updated 7/4/2012 3:47:36 PM
2 Answers/Comments
Get an answer
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments
Good answer
Added 7/4/2012 3:34:21 PM
Flagged by debnjerry
Please don't add comments just to say good answer. Add something of value to the conversations but correcting wrong answers or adding additional information.
Added 7/4/2012 3:47:36 PM
Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
The District Court ruled that the evidence did not meet the applicable "general acceptance" standard for the admission of expert testimony. Finally, the United States Supreme Court held that, under the Federal Rules of Evidence, not Frye, that the evidence did not meet the standard for admitting expert testimony in a federal trial. Which case? (Points : 4) Miranda v Arizona William v. Florida Wells v. Daubert Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Weegy: Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc. User: According to the courts any new evidence seized, resulting from unreasonably seized evidence, is also tainted and is not admissible in court. This is based on the: (Points : 4) Bad evidence doctrine Fruits of the poisonous tree doctrine Illegal seizure doctrine Unreasonable search doctrine Weegy: Stolen evidence is not admissible because it could be tampered with once it was stolen. User: According to the courts any new evidence seized, resulting from unreasonably seized evidence, is also tainted and is not admissible in court. This is based on the: (Points : 4) Bad evidence doctrine Fruits of the poisonous tree doctrine Illegal seizure doctrine Unreasonable search doctrine Weegy: Stolen evidence is not admissible because it could be tampered with once it was stolen. (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 7/4/2012 3:29:48 PM
0 Answers/Comments
18,057,397 questions answered
Popular Conversations
How would you rewrite the equation 2x + 4y + 2 = 3y + 5 in general ...
Weegy: FOIL (First Outside Inside Last) = 2x(2x) + 2x(-3y) + (-3y)(2x) + (-3y)(-3y) = 4x^2 + (-6xy) + (-6xy) + ...
10/30/2014 6:28:25 PM| 4 Answers
Solve the following equation. x + 6 = x + x 2 6 14 72 User: ...
Weegy: I'm sorry, do you have a question I can help you with today? User: Solve for A. BA + C = D A = D - B - C A ...
10/30/2014 9:06:00 AM| 3 Answers
What is the slope of the line that has the equation 4x + 2y = 12?
Weegy: The slope of the line that has the equation 4x + 2y = 12 is -2. User: What is the y-intercept of the line ...
10/30/2014 6:21:18 PM| 3 Answers
Prior to the Seventeenth Amendment, who chose the members of the US ...
Weegy: Prior to the Seventeenth Amendment, State legislatures chose the members of the US Senate. User: Prior to ...
10/30/2014 7:05:25 AM| 2 Answers
In a plane, if two lines are perpendicular to the same line, then ...
Weegy: Two lines parallel to the same plane are parallel to each other. TRUE. User: Congruent triangles are any two ...
10/30/2014 8:12:29 AM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
1
1
1
1
L
1
L
Points 3275 [Total 15650]| Ratings 0| Comments 3275| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
1
L
P
C
1
P
C
1
L
Points 2089 [Total 11570]| Ratings 5| Comments 2039| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
1
L
P
P
L
Points 1114 [Total 13343]| Ratings 1| Comments 1104| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 872 [Total 2271]| Ratings 0| Comments 872| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 673 [Total 674]| Ratings 7| Comments 603| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
L
Points 562 [Total 6356]| Ratings 3| Comments 532| Invitations 0|Online
S
Points 482 [Total 482]| Ratings 0| Comments 452| Invitations 3|Offline
S
Points 464 [Total 464]| Ratings 1| Comments 454| Invitations 0|Online
S
L
Points 79 [Total 1296]| Ratings 1| Comments 69| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
Points 65 [Total 683]| Ratings 0| Comments 65| Invitations 0|Offline
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2014 Purple Inc.