Question and answer
In the case of _________, the Supreme Court ruled that in assessing the admissibility of new and unique scientific tests, the trial judge did not have to rely solely on concept of "general
acceptance." (Points : 4) Michigan v. Tyler Frye v. United States Coppolino v. State Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc.
Expert answered|Airyna|Points 78|
Question
Asked 7/4/2012 3:01:07 PM
Updated 7/4/2012 3:47:36 PM
2 Answers/Comments
Get an answer
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments
Good answer
Added 7/4/2012 3:34:21 PM
Flagged by debnjerry
Please don't add comments just to say good answer. Add something of value to the conversations but correcting wrong answers or adding additional information.
Added 7/4/2012 3:47:36 PM
Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
The District Court ruled that the evidence did not meet the applicable "general acceptance" standard for the admission of expert testimony. Finally, the United States Supreme Court held that, under the Federal Rules of Evidence, not Frye, that the evidence did not meet the standard for admitting expert testimony in a federal trial. Which case? (Points : 4) Miranda v Arizona William v. Florida Wells v. Daubert Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Weegy: Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc. User: According to the courts any new evidence seized, resulting from unreasonably seized evidence, is also tainted and is not admissible in court. This is based on the: (Points : 4) Bad evidence doctrine Fruits of the poisonous tree doctrine Illegal seizure doctrine Unreasonable search doctrine Weegy: Stolen evidence is not admissible because it could be tampered with once it was stolen. User: According to the courts any new evidence seized, resulting from unreasonably seized evidence, is also tainted and is not admissible in court. This is based on the: (Points : 4) Bad evidence doctrine Fruits of the poisonous tree doctrine Illegal seizure doctrine Unreasonable search doctrine Weegy: Stolen evidence is not admissible because it could be tampered with once it was stolen. (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 7/4/2012 3:29:48 PM
0 Answers/Comments
A(n) ___________ is a person who can demonstrate a particular skill or has knowledge in a trade or profession that will help the court determine the truth of the matter at issue. (Points : 4) Lay person Professional Witness Expert Witness Factual Witness
Question
Not Answered
Updated 12/31/2014 10:45:06 PM
1 Answer/Comment


An Expert Witness is a person who can demonstrate a particular skill or has knowledge in a trade or profession that will help the court determine the truth of the matter at issue.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expert_witness
Added 12/31/2014 10:45:06 PM
23,932,937 questions answered
Popular Conversations
Select the verbal; indicate whether it is a participle, gerund, or ...
Weegy: The verbal is "to be done". It is an infinitive and functions as the object of the sentnece. User: Identify ...
2/11/2016 12:57:37 AM| 2 Answers
Austrian-Serbian hostilities initiated World War I. True False NEXT
Weegy: Austrian-Serbian hostilities initiated World War I. False. User: The American reinforcements prevented the ...
2/11/2016 7:33:00 AM| 2 Answers
(x + 5)(x + 2)?
2/11/2016 8:11:42 AM| 2 Answers
Match the world leader with his nation. 1. Fidel Castro Soviet ...
Weegy: What is your question about this wars? User: The main building of the United Nations is located in ...
2/11/2016 12:55:05 PM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
Points 311 [Total 708] Ratings 0 Comments 311 Invitations 0 Offline
S
P
P
L
Points 238 [Total 1045] Ratings 0 Comments 238 Invitations 0 Offline
S
1
L
L
P
R
P
L
P
Points 121 [Total 11294] Ratings 0 Comments 121 Invitations 0 Offline
S
L
P
Points 46 [Total 2114] Ratings 0 Comments 46 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 10 [Total 21] Ratings 1 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Online
S
Points 4 [Total 904] Ratings 0 Comments 4 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 4 [Total 7] Ratings 0 Comments 4 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 2 [Total 2] Ratings 0 Comments 2 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 1 [Total 2] Ratings 0 Comments 1 Invitations 0 Offline
S
R
Points 1 [Total 196] Ratings 0 Comments 1 Invitations 0 Offline
* Excludes moderators and previous
winners (Include)