You have new items in your feed. Click to view.
Question and answer
In the case of _________, the Supreme Court ruled that in assessing the admissibility of new and unique scientific tests, the trial judge did not have to rely solely on concept of "general
acceptance." (Points : 4) Michigan v. Tyler Frye v. United States Coppolino v. State Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc.
Expert answered|Airyna|Points 78|
Question
Asked 7/4/2012 3:01:07 PM
Updated 7/4/2012 3:47:36 PM
2 Answers/Comments
Get an answer
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments
Good answer
Added 7/4/2012 3:34:21 PM
Flagged by debnjerry
Please don't add comments just to say good answer. Add something of value to the conversations but correcting wrong answers or adding additional information.
Added 7/4/2012 3:47:36 PM
Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
The District Court ruled that the evidence did not meet the applicable "general acceptance" standard for the admission of expert testimony. Finally, the United States Supreme Court held that, under the Federal Rules of Evidence, not Frye, that the evidence did not meet the standard for admitting expert testimony in a federal trial. Which case? (Points : 4) Miranda v Arizona William v. Florida Wells v. Daubert Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Weegy: Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc. User: According to the courts any new evidence seized, resulting from unreasonably seized evidence, is also tainted and is not admissible in court. This is based on the: (Points : 4) Bad evidence doctrine Fruits of the poisonous tree doctrine Illegal seizure doctrine Unreasonable search doctrine Weegy: Stolen evidence is not admissible because it could be tampered with once it was stolen. User: According to the courts any new evidence seized, resulting from unreasonably seized evidence, is also tainted and is not admissible in court. This is based on the: (Points : 4) Bad evidence doctrine Fruits of the poisonous tree doctrine Illegal seizure doctrine Unreasonable search doctrine Weegy: Stolen evidence is not admissible because it could be tampered with once it was stolen. (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 7/4/2012 3:29:48 PM
0 Answers/Comments
The standard guideline for determining the judicial admissibility of scientific examination stemmed from which court ruling? (Points : 4) Mincy v. Arizona Kumbo Tire Co., Ltd. V. Carmichael Frye v. United States Coppolino v. State
Question
Not Answered
Updated 110 days ago|4/10/2016 2:14:53 PM
1 Answer/Comment
The standard guideline for determining the judicial admissibility of scientific examination stemmed from Frye v. United States.
Added 110 days ago|4/10/2016 2:14:53 PM
This answer has been confirmed as correct, not copied, and helpful.
Confirmed by Andrew. [4/11/2016 3:01:06 PM]
A(n) ___________ is a person who can demonstrate a particular skill or has knowledge in a trade or profession that will help the court determine the truth of the matter at issue. (Points : 4) Lay person Professional Witness Expert Witness Factual Witness
Question
Not Answered
Updated 12/31/2014 10:45:06 PM
1 Answer/Comment


An Expert Witness is a person who can demonstrate a particular skill or has knowledge in a trade or profession that will help the court determine the truth of the matter at issue.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expert_witness
Added 12/31/2014 10:45:06 PM
0 questions answered
Popular Conversations
Weegy Stuff
S
P
L
Points 622 [Total 1372] Ratings 3 Comments 592 Invitations 0 Offline
S
L
P
P
P
Points 432 [Total 3180] Ratings 0 Comments 432 Invitations 0 Offline
S
P
Points 379 [Total 638] Ratings 1 Comments 369 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 328 [Total 749] Ratings 2 Comments 308 Invitations 0 Online
S
L
P
P
P
Points 112 [Total 3816] Ratings 0 Comments 112 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 88 [Total 227] Ratings 0 Comments 88 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 21 [Total 71] Ratings 2 Comments 1 Invitations 0 Offline
S
1
L
L
P
R
P
L
P
P
R
Points 8 [Total 12606] Ratings 0 Comments 8 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 5 [Total 5] Ratings 0 Comments 5 Invitations 0 Offline
S
L
Points 3 [Total 1766] Ratings 0 Comments 3 Invitations 0 Offline
* Excludes moderators and previous
winners (Include)
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | © Purple Inc.