Question and answer
In the case of _________, the Supreme Court ruled that in assessing the admissibility of new and unique scientific tests, the trial judge did not have to rely solely on concept of "general
acceptance." (Points : 4) Michigan v. Tyler Frye v. United States Coppolino v. State Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc.
Expert answered|Airyna|Points 78|
Question
Asked 7/4/2012 3:01:07 PM
Updated 7/4/2012 3:47:36 PM
2 Answers/Comments
Get an answer
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments
Good answer
Added 7/4/2012 3:34:21 PM
Flagged by debnjerry
Please don't add comments just to say good answer. Add something of value to the conversations but correcting wrong answers or adding additional information.
Added 7/4/2012 3:47:36 PM
Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
The District Court ruled that the evidence did not meet the applicable "general acceptance" standard for the admission of expert testimony. Finally, the United States Supreme Court held that, under the Federal Rules of Evidence, not Frye, that the evidence did not meet the standard for admitting expert testimony in a federal trial. Which case? (Points : 4) Miranda v Arizona William v. Florida Wells v. Daubert Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Weegy: Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc. User: According to the courts any new evidence seized, resulting from unreasonably seized evidence, is also tainted and is not admissible in court. This is based on the: (Points : 4) Bad evidence doctrine Fruits of the poisonous tree doctrine Illegal seizure doctrine Unreasonable search doctrine Weegy: Stolen evidence is not admissible because it could be tampered with once it was stolen. User: According to the courts any new evidence seized, resulting from unreasonably seized evidence, is also tainted and is not admissible in court. This is based on the: (Points : 4) Bad evidence doctrine Fruits of the poisonous tree doctrine Illegal seizure doctrine Unreasonable search doctrine Weegy: Stolen evidence is not admissible because it could be tampered with once it was stolen. (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 7/4/2012 3:29:48 PM
0 Answers/Comments
A(n) ___________ is a person who can demonstrate a particular skill or has knowledge in a trade or profession that will help the court determine the truth of the matter at issue. (Points : 4) Lay person Professional Witness Expert Witness Factual Witness
Question
Not Answered
Updated 212 days ago|12/31/2014 10:45:06 PM
1 Answer/Comment


An Expert Witness is a person who can demonstrate a particular skill or has knowledge in a trade or profession that will help the court determine the truth of the matter at issue.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expert_witness
Added 212 days ago|12/31/2014 10:45:06 PM
21,764,447 questions answered
Popular Conversations
5. What is the correct order of the four steps of the writing ...
Weegy: A. revise. User: 6. The past tense of the verb drive is A. drove. B. droved. C. drived. D. driven.
7/31/2015 6:30:58 AM| 3 Answers
How much oxygen is contained in the ...
Weegy: C. atmosphere, the biosphere and the water cycle User: ________ is the biogeochemical cycle in which carbon ...
7/31/2015 5:11:19 PM| 2 Answers
The basic unit of all forms of life is a(n) A. organ ...
Weegy: C. circulatory system is the organ system is responsible for transporting oxygen throughout the human body. ...
7/31/2015 11:10:05 PM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
Points 38 [Total 264]| Ratings 0| Comments 38| Invitations 0|Online
S
Points 31 [Total 346]| Ratings 0| Comments 31| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
L
Points 4 [Total 8577]| Ratings 0| Comments 4| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
Points 3 [Total 1393]| Ratings 0| Comments 3| Invitations 0|Offline
S
P
C
L
P
L
1
P
P
1
P
1
P
L
Points 3 [Total 10356]| Ratings 0| Comments 3| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
L
Points 1 [Total 8469]| Ratings 0| Comments 1| Invitations 0|Offline
Points 0 [Total 0]| Ratings 0| Comments 0| Invitations 0|Offline
Points 0 [Total 0]| Ratings 0| Comments 0| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 0 [Total 0]| Ratings 0| Comments 0| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 0 [Total 0]| Ratings 0| Comments 0| Invitations 0|Offline
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2015 Purple Inc.