Question and answer
In the case of _________, the Supreme Court ruled that in assessing the admissibility of new and unique scientific tests, the trial judge did not have to rely solely on concept of "general
acceptance." (Points : 4) Michigan v. Tyler Frye v. United States Coppolino v. State Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc.
Expert answered|Airyna|Points 78|
Question
Asked 7/4/2012 3:01:07 PM
Updated 7/4/2012 3:47:36 PM
2 Answers/Comments
Get an answer
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments
Good answer
Added 7/4/2012 3:34:21 PM
Flagged by debnjerry
Please don't add comments just to say good answer. Add something of value to the conversations but correcting wrong answers or adding additional information.
Added 7/4/2012 3:47:36 PM
Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
The District Court ruled that the evidence did not meet the applicable "general acceptance" standard for the admission of expert testimony. Finally, the United States Supreme Court held that, under the Federal Rules of Evidence, not Frye, that the evidence did not meet the standard for admitting expert testimony in a federal trial. Which case? (Points : 4) Miranda v Arizona William v. Florida Wells v. Daubert Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Weegy: Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc. User: According to the courts any new evidence seized, resulting from unreasonably seized evidence, is also tainted and is not admissible in court. This is based on the: (Points : 4) Bad evidence doctrine Fruits of the poisonous tree doctrine Illegal seizure doctrine Unreasonable search doctrine Weegy: Stolen evidence is not admissible because it could be tampered with once it was stolen. User: According to the courts any new evidence seized, resulting from unreasonably seized evidence, is also tainted and is not admissible in court. This is based on the: (Points : 4) Bad evidence doctrine Fruits of the poisonous tree doctrine Illegal seizure doctrine Unreasonable search doctrine Weegy: Stolen evidence is not admissible because it could be tampered with once it was stolen. (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 7/4/2012 3:29:48 PM
0 Answers/Comments
A(n) ___________ is a person who can demonstrate a particular skill or has knowledge in a trade or profession that will help the court determine the truth of the matter at issue. (Points : 4) Lay person Professional Witness Expert Witness Factual Witness
Question
Not Answered
Updated 182 days ago|12/31/2014 10:45:06 PM
1 Answer/Comment


An Expert Witness is a person who can demonstrate a particular skill or has knowledge in a trade or profession that will help the court determine the truth of the matter at issue.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expert_witness
Added 182 days ago|12/31/2014 10:45:06 PM
21,542,316 questions answered
Popular Conversations
Which best identifies the underlined clause? These flower fossils," ...
Weegy: What is the underlined clause in this sentence? "These flower fossils," which came from a vacant lot", are the ...
7/1/2015 2:25:37 AM| 2 Answers
Who is the main character in the necklace
7/1/2015 5:59:25 AM| 2 Answers
In the speech "The Question of South Africa," Tutu uses what literary ...
Weegy: In the speech "The Question of South Africa," Tutu uses what literary skill in his speech to get his point ...
7/1/2015 6:38:29 AM| 2 Answers
What crop is the South most known for? a. corn c. cotton ...
Weegy: A crop is the South most known for CORN.
7/1/2015 6:46:55 AM| 2 Answers
____ determines the overall lightness or darkness of an entire image. ...
Weegy: Brightness determines the overall lightness or darkness of an entire image. User: A photo's color intensity ...
7/1/2015 8:41:33 AM| 2 Answers
Match the example to the common sentence error. 1. uses is ...
Weegy: B)occur when an adverb or other word is placed between to and the verb User: Factor 30y 2 z + 12yz 2 - 18yz. ...
7/1/2015 9:01:05 AM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
1
L
P
1
1
Points 78 [Total 1484]| Ratings 1| Comments 68| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
Points 22 [Total 533]| Ratings 0| Comments 22| Invitations 0|Online
S
1
L
L
Points 6 [Total 8386]| Ratings 0| Comments 6| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
P
P
Points 4 [Total 3563]| Ratings 0| Comments 4| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 4 [Total 4]| Ratings 0| Comments 4| Invitations 0|Offline
S
P
C
L
P
L
1
P
P
1
P
1
P
Points 2 [Total 9531]| Ratings 0| Comments 2| Invitations 0|Offline
S
R
Points 2 [Total 204]| Ratings 0| Comments 2| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 1 [Total 1]| Ratings 0| Comments 1| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 1 [Total 44]| Ratings 0| Comments 1| Invitations 0|Offline
Points 0 [Total 0]| Ratings 0| Comments 0| Invitations 0|Offline
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2015 Purple Inc.