Question and answer
In the case of _________, the Supreme Court ruled that in assessing the admissibility of new and unique scientific tests, the trial judge did not have to rely solely on concept of "general
acceptance." (Points : 4) Michigan v. Tyler Frye v. United States Coppolino v. State Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc.
Expert answered|Airyna|Points 78|
Question
Asked 7/4/2012 3:01:07 PM
Updated 7/4/2012 3:47:36 PM
2 Answers/Comments
Get an answer
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments
Good answer
Added 7/4/2012 3:34:21 PM
Flagged by debnjerry
Please don't add comments just to say good answer. Add something of value to the conversations but correcting wrong answers or adding additional information.
Added 7/4/2012 3:47:36 PM
Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
The District Court ruled that the evidence did not meet the applicable "general acceptance" standard for the admission of expert testimony. Finally, the United States Supreme Court held that, under the Federal Rules of Evidence, not Frye, that the evidence did not meet the standard for admitting expert testimony in a federal trial. Which case? (Points : 4) Miranda v Arizona William v. Florida Wells v. Daubert Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Weegy: Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc. User: According to the courts any new evidence seized, resulting from unreasonably seized evidence, is also tainted and is not admissible in court. This is based on the: (Points : 4) Bad evidence doctrine Fruits of the poisonous tree doctrine Illegal seizure doctrine Unreasonable search doctrine Weegy: Stolen evidence is not admissible because it could be tampered with once it was stolen. User: According to the courts any new evidence seized, resulting from unreasonably seized evidence, is also tainted and is not admissible in court. This is based on the: (Points : 4) Bad evidence doctrine Fruits of the poisonous tree doctrine Illegal seizure doctrine Unreasonable search doctrine Weegy: Stolen evidence is not admissible because it could be tampered with once it was stolen. (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 7/4/2012 3:29:48 PM
0 Answers/Comments
A(n) ___________ is a person who can demonstrate a particular skill or has knowledge in a trade or profession that will help the court determine the truth of the matter at issue. (Points : 4) Lay person Professional Witness Expert Witness Factual Witness
Question
Not Answered
Updated 86 days ago|12/31/2014 10:45:06 PM
1 Answer/Comment


An Expert Witness is a person who can demonstrate a particular skill or has knowledge in a trade or profession that will help the court determine the truth of the matter at issue.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expert_witness
Added 86 days ago|12/31/2014 10:45:06 PM
20,154,921 questions answered
Popular Conversations
Tissues arranged together make up _____, which, when functioning ...
Weegy: Tissues arranged together make up ORGANS, which, when functioning together in groups, make up SYSTEMS. User: ...
3/27/2015 1:09:34 PM| 7 Answers
Perform the indicated operation. 3 + (-4) 1 -1 7 -7
Weegy: 3 + (-4) = 3 - 4 = -1 User: Evaluate BD for A = 5, B = -2, C = 4 and D = -6. -12 -8 8 12 Weegy: If A = 5, B ...
3/28/2015 4:37:41 AM| 7 Answers
The Ramayana is a text from ...
Weegy: The Ramayana is a text from India. User: The following question references Chapter 4 of The Three Musketeers ...
3/27/2015 5:43:33 AM| 2 Answers
The Preamble is the __________. A. introduction to the ...
Weegy: The Preamble is the introduction to the Constitution. User: Federal is defined as __________. A. the ...
3/27/2015 6:43:00 AM| 2 Answers
What was the first armed conflict of the Cold War? A. the Korean ...
Weegy: The Korean war was the first armed conflict of the Cold War. User: What was the outcome of the Vietnam ...
3/27/2015 11:35:25 AM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
P
L
P
P
P
Points 1270 [Total 9156]| Ratings 0| Comments 1270| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
Points 622 [Total 1533]| Ratings 6| Comments 562| Invitations 0|Offline
S
P
C
L
P
L
1
P
Points 475 [Total 7782]| Ratings 8| Comments 395| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
L
Points 450 [Total 7951]| Ratings 0| Comments 450| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 401 [Total 906]| Ratings 10| Comments 291| Invitations 1|Offline
S
L
Points 353 [Total 1475]| Ratings 2| Comments 333| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 199 [Total 567]| Ratings 3| Comments 169| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 58 [Total 58]| Ratings 0| Comments 58| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 42 [Total 158]| Ratings 4| Comments 2| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 35 [Total 126]| Ratings 0| Comments 35| Invitations 0|Offline
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2015 Purple Inc.