Question and answer
In the case of _________, the Supreme Court ruled that in assessing the admissibility of new and unique scientific tests, the trial judge did not have to rely solely on concept of "general
acceptance." (Points : 4) Michigan v. Tyler Frye v. United States Coppolino v. State Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc.
Expert answered|Airyna|Points 78|
Question
Asked 7/4/2012 3:01:07 PM
Updated 7/4/2012 3:47:36 PM
2 Answers/Comments
Get an answer
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments
Good answer
Added 7/4/2012 3:34:21 PM
Flagged by debnjerry
Please don't add comments just to say good answer. Add something of value to the conversations but correcting wrong answers or adding additional information.
Added 7/4/2012 3:47:36 PM
Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
The District Court ruled that the evidence did not meet the applicable "general acceptance" standard for the admission of expert testimony. Finally, the United States Supreme Court held that, under the Federal Rules of Evidence, not Frye, that the evidence did not meet the standard for admitting expert testimony in a federal trial. Which case? (Points : 4) Miranda v Arizona William v. Florida Wells v. Daubert Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Weegy: Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc. User: According to the courts any new evidence seized, resulting from unreasonably seized evidence, is also tainted and is not admissible in court. This is based on the: (Points : 4) Bad evidence doctrine Fruits of the poisonous tree doctrine Illegal seizure doctrine Unreasonable search doctrine Weegy: Stolen evidence is not admissible because it could be tampered with once it was stolen. User: According to the courts any new evidence seized, resulting from unreasonably seized evidence, is also tainted and is not admissible in court. This is based on the: (Points : 4) Bad evidence doctrine Fruits of the poisonous tree doctrine Illegal seizure doctrine Unreasonable search doctrine Weegy: Stolen evidence is not admissible because it could be tampered with once it was stolen. (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 7/4/2012 3:29:48 PM
0 Answers/Comments
A(n) ___________ is a person who can demonstrate a particular skill or has knowledge in a trade or profession that will help the court determine the truth of the matter at issue. (Points : 4) Lay person Professional Witness Expert Witness Factual Witness
Question
Not Answered
Updated 145 days ago|12/31/2014 10:45:06 PM
1 Answer/Comment


An Expert Witness is a person who can demonstrate a particular skill or has knowledge in a trade or profession that will help the court determine the truth of the matter at issue.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expert_witness
Added 145 days ago|12/31/2014 10:45:06 PM
21,066,200 questions answered
Popular Conversations
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) was largely a response to-
Weegy: As a result of SOX, top management must individually certify the accuracy of financial information. User: A ...
5/25/2015 7:13:43 AM| 2 Answers
The Earth is located in the Milky Way, which is a ____________ ...
Weegy: The Earth is located in the Milky Way, which is a spiral galaxy. User: The revolution of the Earth creates ...
5/25/2015 9:41:50 AM| 2 Answers
Types include rain, sleet, snow and hail
Weegy: Precipitation creates clouds, snow, sleet, rain and hail. User: Is the only known planet that is able to ...
5/25/2015 9:45:12 AM| 2 Answers
Daffydowndilly's dialogue with the stranger shows that Daffydowndilly ...
Weegy: D. open-minded User: Which lines from the poem most clearly express the poet's philosophical approach to the ...
5/25/2015 1:25:13 PM| 2 Answers
Use the discriminant to describe the roots of each equation. Then ...
Weegy: 3x^2 - 2 + 7x = 0 discriminant = b^2 - 4ac = 7^2 - 4(3)(-2) = 49 + 24 = 73 > 0 There are Two Real Irrational ...
5/25/2015 1:48:40 PM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
Points 706 [Total 1236]| Ratings 2| Comments 686| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 638 [Total 646]| Ratings 1| Comments 628| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
Points 529 [Total 921]| Ratings 2| Comments 509| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
P
Points 353 [Total 2830]| Ratings 1| Comments 343| Invitations 0|Offline
S
P
C
L
P
L
1
P
P
1
P
1
Points 248 [Total 8994]| Ratings 0| Comments 248| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 118 [Total 138]| Ratings 0| Comments 118| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
L
Points 67 [Total 8250]| Ratings 0| Comments 67| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 56 [Total 3810]| Ratings 2| Comments 36| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
1
R
Points 35 [Total 1322]| Ratings 0| Comments 35| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 14 [Total 14]| Ratings 0| Comments 14| Invitations 0|Offline
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2015 Purple Inc.