Question and answer
In the case of _________, the Supreme Court ruled that in assessing the admissibility of new and unique scientific tests, the trial judge did not have to rely solely on concept of "general
acceptance." (Points : 4) Michigan v. Tyler Frye v. United States Coppolino v. State Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc.
Expert answered|Airyna|Points 78|
Question
Asked 7/4/2012 3:01:07 PM
Updated 7/4/2012 3:47:36 PM
2 Answers/Comments
Get an answer
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments
Good answer
Added 7/4/2012 3:34:21 PM
Flagged by debnjerry
Please don't add comments just to say good answer. Add something of value to the conversations but correcting wrong answers or adding additional information.
Added 7/4/2012 3:47:36 PM
Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
The District Court ruled that the evidence did not meet the applicable "general acceptance" standard for the admission of expert testimony. Finally, the United States Supreme Court held that, under the Federal Rules of Evidence, not Frye, that the evidence did not meet the standard for admitting expert testimony in a federal trial. Which case? (Points : 4) Miranda v Arizona William v. Florida Wells v. Daubert Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Weegy: Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc. User: According to the courts any new evidence seized, resulting from unreasonably seized evidence, is also tainted and is not admissible in court. This is based on the: (Points : 4) Bad evidence doctrine Fruits of the poisonous tree doctrine Illegal seizure doctrine Unreasonable search doctrine Weegy: Stolen evidence is not admissible because it could be tampered with once it was stolen. User: According to the courts any new evidence seized, resulting from unreasonably seized evidence, is also tainted and is not admissible in court. This is based on the: (Points : 4) Bad evidence doctrine Fruits of the poisonous tree doctrine Illegal seizure doctrine Unreasonable search doctrine Weegy: Stolen evidence is not admissible because it could be tampered with once it was stolen. (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 7/4/2012 3:29:48 PM
0 Answers/Comments
17,884,185 questions answered
Popular Conversations
Choose the product. -7p3(4p2 + 3p - 1)
Weegy: -7p3(4p2 3p - 1) = 7p3 - 84p6. Source: User: Find the quotient. 42j4k2 ÷ (-3j3k) Weegy: = 42j k /- 3j k) = ...
10/19/2014 5:43:50 PM| 3 Answers
Describe the key differences between managing and leading.
Weegy: ]
10/19/2014 5:51:01 PM| 3 Answers
Find the sum and choose the correct answer. 2n3 + 4n2 - 7 and -n3 + ...
Weegy: (2 n^3+4 n^2-7)+(-n^3+8 n-9) your answer is n^3+4 n^2+8 n-16 User: Select the correct difference. -3z7 - ...
10/19/2014 5:41:21 PM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
1
1
1
1
L
1
L
Points 2090 [Total 14465]| Ratings 0| Comments 2090| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
1
L
P
C
1
P
C
1
L
Points 1393 [Total 10874]| Ratings 3| Comments 1363| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
1
L
P
P
L
Points 710 [Total 12939]| Ratings 0| Comments 710| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
L
Points 423 [Total 6217]| Ratings 3| Comments 393| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 423 [Total 1822]| Ratings 0| Comments 423| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 356 [Total 356]| Ratings 0| Comments 326| Invitations 3|Offline
S
Points 265 [Total 266]| Ratings 2| Comments 245| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 155 [Total 155]| Ratings 1| Comments 145| Invitations 0|Online
S
P
C
L
P
L
1
Points 43 [Total 6277]| Ratings 0| Comments 43| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 27 [Total 27]| Ratings 0| Comments 27| Invitations 0|Offline
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2014 Purple Inc.