Question and answer
In the case of _________, the Supreme Court ruled that in assessing the admissibility of new and unique scientific tests, the trial judge did not have to rely solely on concept of "general
acceptance." (Points : 4) Michigan v. Tyler Frye v. United States Coppolino v. State Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc.
Expert answered|Airyna|Points 78|
Question
Asked 7/4/2012 3:01:07 PM
Updated 7/4/2012 3:47:36 PM
2 Answers/Comments
Get an answer
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments
Good answer
Added 7/4/2012 3:34:21 PM
Flagged by debnjerry
Please don't add comments just to say good answer. Add something of value to the conversations but correcting wrong answers or adding additional information.
Added 7/4/2012 3:47:36 PM
Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
The District Court ruled that the evidence did not meet the applicable "general acceptance" standard for the admission of expert testimony. Finally, the United States Supreme Court held that, under the Federal Rules of Evidence, not Frye, that the evidence did not meet the standard for admitting expert testimony in a federal trial. Which case? (Points : 4) Miranda v Arizona William v. Florida Wells v. Daubert Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Weegy: Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc. User: According to the courts any new evidence seized, resulting from unreasonably seized evidence, is also tainted and is not admissible in court. This is based on the: (Points : 4) Bad evidence doctrine Fruits of the poisonous tree doctrine Illegal seizure doctrine Unreasonable search doctrine Weegy: Stolen evidence is not admissible because it could be tampered with once it was stolen. User: According to the courts any new evidence seized, resulting from unreasonably seized evidence, is also tainted and is not admissible in court. This is based on the: (Points : 4) Bad evidence doctrine Fruits of the poisonous tree doctrine Illegal seizure doctrine Unreasonable search doctrine Weegy: Stolen evidence is not admissible because it could be tampered with once it was stolen. (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 7/4/2012 3:29:48 PM
0 Answers/Comments
18,766,134 questions answered
Popular Conversations
Identify the subjunctive verb in the sentences below. I don't know ...
Weegy: I don't know the answer. I wish I knew it. WISH is the subjunctive verb in the sentence.
12/17/2014 6:09:48 PM| 3 Answers
When you're creating garnishes, which of the following is the most ...
Weegy: Cucumber will do, but also you can use other fruits and vegetables too like watermelon, carrots, Red bell ...
12/17/2014 12:42:27 AM| 2 Answers
t Object]User: Poverty threshold is an income level above which ...
Weegy: ... then of the Social Security Administration- determines which households have insufficient ... income is ...
12/17/2014 5:44:53 AM| 2 Answers
Given the points A(0, 0), B(e, f), C(0, e) and D(f, 0), determine if ...
Weegy: Please clarify your question. User: Indicate in standard form the equation of the line passing through the ...
12/17/2014 11:42:53 AM| 2 Answers
Which term best describes the underlined words? Having good balance ...
Weegy: If Jacob wants to surf the waves, he can rent a surfboard. "to surf the waves" is an infinitive phrase. User: ...
12/17/2014 2:59:27 PM| 2 Answers
The securities and exchange commission is
Weegy: Hello, I hope this research helps you. [smile] The mission of the U.S. [ Securities and Exchange Commission is ...
12/17/2014 5:12:34 PM| 2 Answers
The value of y varies directly with x, and y = 12 when x = 6. Find y ...
Weegy: -3 / 4 + 1.5 = 0.75 User: If y=6 when x=9, find X when Y=12
12/17/2014 8:18:35 PM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
P
Points 996 [Total 4840]| Ratings 0| Comments 996| Invitations 0|Online
S
Points 604 [Total 604]| Ratings 1| Comments 594| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 603 [Total 1294]| Ratings 1| Comments 593| Invitations 0|Online
S
1
L
1
L
P
P
L
P
Points 594 [Total 14779]| Ratings 0| Comments 594| Invitations 0|Offline
S
P
C
L
P
L
1
Points 82 [Total 6401]| Ratings 1| Comments 72| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 64 [Total 1524]| Ratings 1| Comments 54| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
L
Points 33 [Total 6700]| Ratings 0| Comments 33| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 23 [Total 29]| Ratings 0| Comments 23| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 22 [Total 22]| Ratings 0| Comments 2| Invitations 2|Offline
S
Points 21 [Total 21]| Ratings 0| Comments 21| Invitations 0|Offline
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2014 Purple Inc.