Question and answer
Virtually every person incarcerated in jail and 97% of those incarcerated in prison: Answer will commit another crime. will eventually be released back into society. are too poor to hire a
private attorney. do not have a high school education.
State and federal lawmakers are finally realizing that controlling prison costs means controlling recidivism - by helping newly released people establish viable lives once they get out of jail. [ A report just out from a group of 100 policy makers, including elected officials, established by the Council of State Governments argues that the country needs to reinvent its corrections system. In the
place of a system that locks people up and shoves them out the door when their sentences are finished, the report, by the Re-Entry Policy Council, envisions "re-entry" services that reintegrate ex-offenders into their communities. This line of thinking is long overdue. The United States has 2.1 million people behind bars on any given day - nearly seven times the number three decades ago. Corrections costs have risen accordingly - from about $9 billion a year two decades ago to more than $60 billion a year today - making corrections the second-fastest-growing expense in state budgets, after Medicaid. The portrait of the inmate population offered in the report leaves no doubt as to why two-thirds of the people who leave prison are rearrested within a few years. These people were marginally employable before they went to jail - nearly half earned less than $600 a month. They are even less employable afterward, thanks to criminal records. In addition, many of them suffer from mental illnesses that often go untreated after release. The social services necessary for successful re-entry are virtually nonexistent in most communities. The new report offers an exhaustive prescription for changing the status quo: states will need to coax disparate parts of their systems to work together. State officials will also have to re-educate voters, who have grown accustomed to a corrections philosophy that begins and ends with merely locking people up for the longest possible period of time. These policies will need to change, and quickly, if the states are to solve the recidivism problem and develop programs that help former inmates find homes, training, jobs and places in their communities. ]
Get an answer
Original conversation
User: If a probationer does not claim a right against self-incrimination, any statements made to a probation officer may be used as evidence. true or false?

User: Virtually every person incarcerated in jail and 97% of those incarcerated in prison: Answer will commit another crime. will eventually be released back into society. are too poor to hire a private attorney. do not have a high school education.

Weegy: State and federal lawmakers are finally realizing that controlling prison costs means controlling recidivism - by helping newly released people establish viable lives once they get out of jail. [ A report just out from a group of 100 policy makers, including elected officials, established by the Council of State Governments argues that the country needs to reinvent its corrections system. In the place of a system that locks people up and shoves them out the door when their sentences are finished, the report, by the Re-Entry Policy Council, envisions "re-entry" services that reintegrate ex-offenders into their communities. This line of thinking is long overdue. The United States has 2.1 million people behind bars on any given day - nearly seven times the number three decades ago. Corrections costs have risen accordingly - from about $9 billion a year two decades ago to more than $60 billion a year today - making corrections the second-fastest-growing expense in state budgets, after Medicaid. The portrait of the inmate population offered in the report leaves no doubt as to why two-thirds of the people who leave prison are rearrested within a few years. These people were marginally employable before they went to jail - nearly half earned less than $600 a month. They are even less employable afterward, thanks to criminal records. In addition, many of them suffer from mental illnesses that often go untreated after release. The social services necessary for successful re-entry are virtually nonexistent in most communities. The new report offers an exhaustive prescription for changing the status quo: states will need to coax disparate parts of their systems to work together. State officials will also have to re-educate voters, who have grown accustomed to a corrections philosophy that begins and ends with merely locking people up for the longest possible period of time. These policies will need to change, and quickly, if the states are to solve the recidivism problem and develop programs that help former inmates find homes, training, jobs and places in their communities. ]
Expert answered|Dmcinnita|Points 10|

Question
Asked 11/21/2012 8:49:01 AM
0 Answers/Comments
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
Federal probation officers have the authority to arrest probation violators, but they are encouraged to obtain an arrest warrant from a court and have the warrant executed by Answer state officials. the U.S. Marshals Service. the F.B.I. local police.
Weegy: Federal probation officers have the authority to arrest probation violators, but they are encouraged to obtain an arrest warrant from a court and have the warrant executed by state officials. (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 11/21/2012 9:04:15 AM
0 Answers/Comments
Who makes the release decision when an offender is sentenced to shock parole? Answer the appellate court judge the U.S. Sentencing Commission the parole board the prosecutor
Weegy: The parole board makes the release decision when an offender is sentenced to shock parole. (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 11/21/2012 9:06:42 AM
0 Answers/Comments
Streetwise young women with little respect for traditional prison values are called: Answer cools. lifes. squares. crack kids.
Question
Not Answered
Updated 11/21/2012 10:34:10 AM
1 Answer/Comment
Streetwise young women with little respect for traditional prison values are called crack kids.
Added 11/21/2012 10:34:10 AM
This answer has been added to the Weegy Knowledgebase
Streetwise young women with little respect for traditional prison values are called: Answer cools. lifes. squares. crack kids.
Question
Not Answered
Updated 11/21/2012 10:44:43 AM
1 Answer/Comment
Streetwise young women with little respect for traditional prison values are called: crack kids.
Added 11/21/2012 10:44:43 AM
This answer has been added to the Weegy Knowledgebase
21,966,256 questions answered
Popular Conversations
The etymology of a word is sometimes reflected in its ...
Weegy: Have a great day! Ask Weegy again soon User: The transition word(s) that would best introduce an example ...
8/31/2015 6:25:44 AM| 2 Answers
Find the value of 83 - [59 - (22 - 18)].
Weegy: 83 - (59 - (22 - 18)) =83 - (59 - 4) =83 - 55 =28 User: Find the value of 5 · 2 ^3
8/31/2015 8:28:09 AM| 2 Answers
Find two consecutive integers whose sum is 67. Which of the ...
Weegy: To find two consecutive integers whose sum is 67 use the equation 2x + 1= 67 2x + 1= 67 2x = 67 - 1 2x = ...
8/31/2015 9:51:16 AM| 2 Answers
The ____ is the layer of the atmosphere nearest to Earth's ...
Weegy: Some scientists hypothesize that Earth's ozone layer is being damaged by chlorofluorocarbons. User: a gas ...
8/31/2015 10:33:27 AM| 2 Answers
The sum of two consecutive odd integers is -72 What is the larger ...
Weegy: The larger integer is -135 User: The sum of two consecutive even integers is -34 What is the smaller integer?
8/31/2015 10:38:43 AM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
L
P
1
Points 27 [Total 9337]| Ratings 1| Comments 17| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 20 [Total 325]| Ratings 0| Comments 20| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 19 [Total 803]| Ratings 0| Comments 19| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 9 [Total 197]| Ratings 0| Comments 9| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 3 [Total 227]| Ratings 0| Comments 3| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
L
P
R
Points 2 [Total 9325]| Ratings 0| Comments 2| Invitations 0|Offline
Points 0 [Total 0]| Ratings 0| Comments 0| Invitations 0|Offline
Points 0 [Total 0]| Ratings 0| Comments 0| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 0 [Total 0]| Ratings 0| Comments 0| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 0 [Total 0]| Ratings 0| Comments 0| Invitations 0|Offline
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2015 Purple Inc.