Notice: Payments for answers will end 4/10/2017. Click for more info.
You have new items in your feed. Click to view.
Question and answer
Q: If the Supreme Court were to rule that gay marriage is a fundamental right, under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, that would mean (Points : 1) each state would still
be able to decide for itself whether it recognizes gay marriage or not. no state may distinguish between gay marriage and heterosexual marriage because that would effectively create invidious distinctions. that Congress must create a public assistance program for gay couples. that only married people enjoy protection under the Equal Protection Clause.
A: each state would still be able to decide for itself whether it recognizes gay marriage or not.
Get an answer
Original conversation
[object Object]User: If the Supreme Court were to rule that gay marriage is a fundamental right, under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, that would mean (Points : 1) each state would still be able to decide for itself whether it recognizes gay marriage or not. no state may distinguish between gay marriage and heterosexual marriage because that would effectively create invidious distinctions. that Congress must create a public assistance program for gay couples. that only married people enjoy protection under the Equal Protection Clause.

Weegy: each state would still be able to decide for itself whether it recognizes gay marriage or not.
newbre|Points 50|

User: The Privileges and Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment means (Points : 1) citizens of the United States may travel across state lines without documentation. states must all have the exact same laws as each other. that if one state recognizes gay marriage all states must recognize gay marriage. that whatever recognized rights one has as a citizen must be recognized by all states.

Weegy: that whatever recognized rights one has as a citizen must be recognized by all states.
kamil1218|Points 60|

User: Gideon v. Wainwright overturned (Points : 1) Powell v. Alabama. Roe v. Wade. Mapp v. Ohio. Betts v. Brady.

Weegy: Gideon v. Wainwright overturned -> Betts v. Brady
sujaysen|Points 3653|

User: idea of original intent claims that (Points : 1) judges should try to understand what the views of those who authored certain provisions of the Constitution. judges should interpret the Constitution on the basis of what the Framers and later authors of various amendments intended when they wrote them. judges who abide by the original intent adapt the intended meaning of the Constitution to modern circumstances. judges should abide by original intent only when it is consistent with mainstream public opinion.

Question
Asked 2/10/2013 8:58:33 PM
0 Answers/Comments
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
26,640,063 questions answered
Popular Conversations
Suppose the U.S. can produce cars for a lower opportunity cost than ...
Weegy: Suppose the U.S. can produce cars for a lower opportunity cost than Japan while Japan has a comparative ...
2/13/2018 7:30:37 PM| 4 Answers
What's the simplified form of 2x + 3 x + 5? A. x 8 B. ...
Weegy: (2x^2)(3x^2) = 6x4 User: Simplify this expression: 13 + (–12) – (–5) = ? A. –6 B. 6 C. –30 ...
2/12/2018 11:53:02 PM| 3 Answers
Solve this equation: 80 = 3y + 2y + 4 + 1. A. y = 1/5 B. ...
Weegy: 80 = 3y + 2y + 4 + 1 80 = 5y + 5 80 - 5 = 5y -5y = -75 y = 15 User: Solve the inequality: 12p + 7 > 139 ...
2/14/2018 2:20:46 PM| 3 Answers
Solve the equation: 12y = 132. A. y = 11 B. y = 144 ...
Weegy: 12y = 132 User: Solve this equation: 2s + s + 12 = 132. A. s = 40 B. s = –30 C. s = 9 D. ...
2/14/2018 2:32:47 PM| 3 Answers
Write 10 5/12 as an equivalent improper fraction.
Weegy: 10 5/12 in improper fraction form is 125/12. User: Subtract: 8 – 4 1/2
2/15/2018 12:27:39 AM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
Points 344 [Total 347] Ratings 10 Comments 214 Invitations 3 Offline
S
Points 89 [Total 89] Ratings 0 Comments 19 Invitations 7 Offline
S
P
Points 41 [Total 85] Ratings 1 Comments 31 Invitations 0 Offline
S
P
L
P
P
Points 39 [Total 232] Ratings 0 Comments 39 Invitations 0 Offline
S
1
L
L
P
R
P
L
P
P
R
Points 28 [Total 12639] Ratings 0 Comments 28 Invitations 0 Online
S
Points 20 [Total 20] Ratings 2 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Offline
S
P
Points 13 [Total 30] Ratings 0 Comments 13 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 11 [Total 11] Ratings 1 Comments 1 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 10 [Total 10] Ratings 0 Comments 0 Invitations 1 Offline
S
Points 5 [Total 5] Ratings 0 Comments 5 Invitations 0 Offline
* Excludes moderators and previous
winners (Include)
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | © Purple Inc.