Question and answer
How do the media pose security concerns to the courts?
The Court has generally rejected requests to extend to the press Privileges and Immunities beyond those available to ordinary citizens. In Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665, 92 S. Ct. 2646, 33 L. Ed. [ 2d 626 (1972), it held that a journalist's privilege to refuse to disclose information such as the names of informants is no broader than that enjoyed by any citizen. As long as an inquiry is
conducted in Good Faith, with relevant questions and no harassment, a journalist must cooperate. Justice Stewart's dissent in Branzburg urged the Court to find that a qualified journalistic privilege exists unless the government is able to show three things: (1) Probable Cause to believe that the journalist possesses information that is clearly relevant; (2) an inability to obtain the material by less intrusive means; and (3) a compelling interest that overrides First Amendment interests. In an unusual break with tradition, several circuit courts have applied Stewart's test and ruled in favor of journalists seeking special First Amendment protection. Nonetheless, the Supreme Court has steadfastly held to its decision in Branzburg, and shows no sign of retreating from its position that the First Amendment confers no special privileges on journalists. Laws that affect the ability of the press to gather and publish news are suspect, but not automatically unconstitutional. In Cohen v. Cowles Media Co., 501 U.S. 663, 111 S. Ct. 2513, 115 L. Ed. 2d 586 (1991), reporters for two Twin Cities newspapers were sued for breach of contract when they published the name of their source after promising confidentiality. The reporters claimed that the law infringed their First Amendment freedom to gather news unencumbered by state law. The Court held that the law did not unconstitutionally undermine their rights because its enforcement imposed only an incidental burden on their ability to gather and report information. Writing for the majority, Justice byron r. ]
Expert answered|koronamel88|Points 140|
Question
Asked 5/16/2013 10:26:58 PM
0 Answers/Comments
Get an answer
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
analyze court security and courthouse violence
Weegy: Because courthouses must be accessible and in centralized locations, they are vunerable to acts of random violence. [ Courts must have proper court security procedures, technology, personnel, and architectural features, to not only protect the safety of the people and property within and around the courts, but also the integrity of the judicial process. While there is no one solution to issues concerning court security, proper planning ... (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 5/16/2013 9:55:18 PM
0 Answers/Comments
17,201,391 questions answered
Popular Conversations
Consider this quote: "In each of these historical instances . . . ...
Weegy: D. it stands for the omission of only a single word. User: Which of the following statements correctly ...
9/1/2014 8:30:28 AM| 2 Answers
The invasion of this region temporarily halted the fighting between ...
Weegy: The invasion of A.Korea halted the the fighting between the KMT and CPC. User: The letters DMZ stand for ...
9/1/2014 3:12:20 PM| 2 Answers
what is a complex sentence
Weegy: User: what is a simple sentence Weegy: User: what is a compound sentence Weegy: A compound sentence ...
9/1/2014 5:04:39 PM| 2 Answers
Every set of three points is coplanar.
9/1/2014 7:59:14 PM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
1
L
P
C
1
Points 224 [Total 6757]| Ratings 0| Comments 224| Invitations 0|Offline
S
R
L
1
1
P
C
1
P
1
1
L
P
C
P
C
1
P
C
L
P
C
1
P
C
P
C
P
C
Points 174 [Total 24573]| Ratings 0| Comments 174| Invitations 0|Online
S
L
C
P
C
1
L
L
P
C
1
Points 159 [Total 16098]| Ratings 1| Comments 149| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
1
1
1
1
L
1
Points 121 [Total 9901]| Ratings 0| Comments 121| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
P
C
L
P
C
P
C
L
P
C
P
C
P
C
Points 93 [Total 17265]| Ratings 0| Comments 93| Invitations 0|Online
S
L
P
C
P
C
1
L
P
C
L
P
C
P
C
P
C
P
C
Points 73 [Total 18604]| Ratings 0| Comments 73| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
1
L
P
P
L
Points 42 [Total 11288]| Ratings 0| Comments 42| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 29 [Total 699]| Ratings 0| Comments 29| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
L
Points 28 [Total 5152]| Ratings 0| Comments 28| Invitations 0|Offline
S
P
C
L
P
L
1
Points 24 [Total 6081]| Ratings 1| Comments 14| Invitations 0|Offline
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2014 Purple Inc.