Question and answer
Analyze information about relationships among Congress, the military bureaucracies, and defense industries
Military?industrial complex, or military?industrial?congressional complex[1], is a concept commonly used to refer to policy and monetary relationships between legislators, national armed forces, and the defense industrial base that supports them. [ These relationships include political contributions, political approval for defense spending, lobbying to support bureaucracies, and oversight of the
industry. It is a type of iron triangle. The term is most often used in reference to the system behind the military of the United States, where it gained popularity after its use in the farewell address of President Dwight D. Eisenhower on January 17, 1961, though the term is applicable to any country with a similarly developed infrastructure. The term is sometimes used more broadly to include the entire network of contracts and flows of money and resources among individuals as well as corporations and institutions of the defense contractors, The Pentagon, the Congress and executive branch. This sector is intrinsically prone to principal?agent problem, moral hazard, and rent seeking. Cases of political corruption have also surfaced with regularity. A parallel system is that of the Military?industrial?media complex, along with the more distant Politico-media complex and Prison-industrial complex. A similar thesis was originally expressed by Daniel Gu?rin, in his 1936 book Fascism and Big Business, about the fascist government support to heavy industry. It can be defined as, "an informal and changing coalition of groups with vested psychological, moral, and material interests in the continuous development and maintenance of high levels of weaponry, in preservation of colonial markets and in military-strategic conceptions of internal affairs."[2] ]
Original conversation
User: Analyze information about relationships among Congress, the military bureaucracies, and defense industries

Weegy: Military?industrial complex, or military?industrial?congressional complex[1], is a concept commonly used to refer to policy and monetary relationships between legislators, national armed forces, and the defense industrial base that supports them. [ These relationships include political contributions, political approval for defense spending, lobbying to support bureaucracies, and oversight of the industry. It is a type of iron triangle. The term is most often used in reference to the system behind the military of the United States, where it gained popularity after its use in the farewell address of President Dwight D. Eisenhower on January 17, 1961, though the term is applicable to any country with a similarly developed infrastructure. The term is sometimes used more broadly to include the entire network of contracts and flows of money and resources among individuals as well as corporations and institutions of the defense contractors, The Pentagon, the Congress and executive branch. This sector is intrinsically prone to principal?agent problem, moral hazard, and rent seeking. Cases of political corruption have also surfaced with regularity. A parallel system is that of the Military?industrial?media complex, along with the more distant Politico-media complex and Prison-industrial complex. A similar thesis was originally expressed by Daniel Gu?rin, in his 1936 book Fascism and Big Business, about the fascist government support to heavy industry. It can be defined as, "an informal and changing coalition of groups with vested psychological, moral, and material interests in the continuous development and maintenance of high levels of weaponry, in preservation of colonial markets and in military-strategic conceptions of internal affairs."[2] ]
rocketmail|Points 363|

User: draw your own conclusion and support it with facts and persuasive reasoning about the impact of these relationships on defense spending





Weegy: These kinds of information are not publicly available
Expert answered|uxiali|Points 1101|

Question
Asked 1/2/2013 2:34:44 PM
0 Answers/Comments
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Home | Contact | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2013 Purple Inc.
Ask a question. Get an instant answer from an advanced search engine and a team of really smart live experts. Always free.
Popular Conversations
The Cultural Revolution was a plan to a. make Chinese culture popular ...
Weegy: The Cultural Revolution was a plan to replace ancient culture with a socialist culture. As well as removing ...
4/15/2014 2:15:34 PM| 13 Answers
1. Simplify the expression. 22 + (32 – 42) User: 3. Evaluate the ...
Weegy: 4y + 5 = ? 31 4y = -31 - 5 4y = -36 y = -36/4 y = -9 User: Solve the equation. Check your answer. 3x – 7 = ...
4/15/2014 4:20:45 PM| 4 Answers
What is the slope of the line that passes through the points (-2, ...
Weegy: (-3)^-2 = 1/(-3)^2 = 1/9 User: What is the slope of the line that passes through the points (3, -2) and (9, ...
4/15/2014 6:30:47 AM| 3 Answers
what is anthropology
Weegy: Anthropology is the study of humankind, past and present, that draws and builds upon knowledge from social and ...
4/16/2014 3:13:10 AM| 3 Answers
All of the following were achievements of the Sumerian culture ...
Weegy: All of the following were achievements of the Sumerian culture except the Great Pyramid.
4/15/2014 6:46:30 AM| 2 Answers
children
Weegy: what is your question about chil? User: children women the king men played the most vital musical role in ...
4/15/2014 12:48:26 PM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
P
C
P
C
1
L
P
C
Points 1255 [Total 9136]| Ratings 0| Comments 1255| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
P
C
L
P
C
Points 1176 [Total 6563]| Ratings 0| Comments 1176| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
1
L
P
Points 383 [Total 7060]| Ratings 1| Comments 373| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 333 [Total 2780]| Ratings 2| Comments 303| Invitations 1|Online
S
Points 137 [Total 553]| Ratings 0| Comments 137| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
Points 136 [Total 466]| Ratings 3| Comments 106| Invitations 0|Offline
S
R
Points 95 [Total 207]| Ratings 5| Comments 35| Invitations 1|Offline
S
Points 92 [Total 736]| Ratings 1| Comments 82| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 83 [Total 83]| Ratings 4| Comments 23| Invitations 2|Offline
S
P
C
L
P
Points 76 [Total 3921]| Ratings 0| Comments 76| Invitations 0|Offline