You have new items in your feed. Click to view.
Question and answer
Analyze information about relationships among Congress, the military bureaucracies, and defense industries
Military?industrial complex, or military?industrial?congressional complex[1], is a concept commonly used to refer to policy and monetary relationships between legislators, national armed forces, and the defense industrial base that supports them. [ These relationships include political contributions, political approval for defense spending, lobbying to support bureaucracies, and oversight of the
industry. It is a type of iron triangle. The term is most often used in reference to the system behind the military of the United States, where it gained popularity after its use in the farewell address of President Dwight D. Eisenhower on January 17, 1961, though the term is applicable to any country with a similarly developed infrastructure. The term is sometimes used more broadly to include the entire network of contracts and flows of money and resources among individuals as well as corporations and institutions of the defense contractors, The Pentagon, the Congress and executive branch. This sector is intrinsically prone to principal?agent problem, moral hazard, and rent seeking. Cases of political corruption have also surfaced with regularity. A parallel system is that of the Military?industrial?media complex, along with the more distant Politico-media complex and Prison-industrial complex. A similar thesis was originally expressed by Daniel Gu?rin, in his 1936 book Fascism and Big Business, about the fascist government support to heavy industry. It can be defined as, "an informal and changing coalition of groups with vested psychological, moral, and material interests in the continuous development and maintenance of high levels of weaponry, in preservation of colonial markets and in military-strategic conceptions of internal affairs."[2] ]
Get an answer
Original conversation
User: Analyze information about relationships among Congress, the military bureaucracies, and defense industries

Weegy: Military?industrial complex, or military?industrial?congressional complex[1], is a concept commonly used to refer to policy and monetary relationships between legislators, national armed forces, and the defense industrial base that supports them. [ These relationships include political contributions, political approval for defense spending, lobbying to support bureaucracies, and oversight of the industry. It is a type of iron triangle. The term is most often used in reference to the system behind the military of the United States, where it gained popularity after its use in the farewell address of President Dwight D. Eisenhower on January 17, 1961, though the term is applicable to any country with a similarly developed infrastructure. The term is sometimes used more broadly to include the entire network of contracts and flows of money and resources among individuals as well as corporations and institutions of the defense contractors, The Pentagon, the Congress and executive branch. This sector is intrinsically prone to principal?agent problem, moral hazard, and rent seeking. Cases of political corruption have also surfaced with regularity. A parallel system is that of the Military?industrial?media complex, along with the more distant Politico-media complex and Prison-industrial complex. A similar thesis was originally expressed by Daniel Gu?rin, in his 1936 book Fascism and Big Business, about the fascist government support to heavy industry. It can be defined as, "an informal and changing coalition of groups with vested psychological, moral, and material interests in the continuous development and maintenance of high levels of weaponry, in preservation of colonial markets and in military-strategic conceptions of internal affairs."[2] ]
rocketmail|Points 363|

User: draw your own conclusion and support it with facts and persuasive reasoning about the impact of these relationships on defense spending





Weegy: These kinds of information are not publicly available
Expert answered|uxiali|Points 1101|

Question
Asked 1/2/2013 2:34:44 PM
0 Answers/Comments
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
26,213,360 questions answered
Popular Conversations
Find the quotient. 4 r ÷ 4 s 4r ÷ s 4r - s 4r + s User: ...
Weegy: False User: Simplify. y 5 · y 3 ÷ y 2 User: Simplify. n 6 · n 5 ÷ n 4 · n 3 ÷ n 2 · n User: Simplify 3a · ...
9/26/2016 11:25:47 AM| 3 Answers
Solve for x. 7(3 - x) = 8(4 - 2x)
Weegy: 7(3 - x) = 8(4 - 2x); 21 - 7x = 32 - 16x; -7x + 16x = 32 - 21; 9x = 11; x = 11/9 User: Solve for x. ...
9/27/2016 11:22:30 AM| 3 Answers
Evaluate the following expression. (8^1)^0
Weegy: A number can not be divided by zero. The answer to 8/0 is undefined. User: Find the product. -7(-a 2)(-b ...
9/26/2016 10:49:35 AM| 2 Answers
Find the product. y^5 · y^3
Weegy: y^5 · y^3 = y^8 User: Find the product. (-4·3·2)^2 User: Find the product. (fg)^9
9/26/2016 10:59:57 AM| 2 Answers
sulfides
Weegy: Copper monosulfide. User: what makes up sulfides
9/27/2016 10:16:01 AM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
P
P
P
P
P
L
Points 995 [Total 5067] Ratings 2 Comments 975 Invitations 0 Offline
S
P
1
L
Points 744 [Total 1624] Ratings 6 Comments 684 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 205 [Total 499] Ratings 0 Comments 205 Invitations 0 Offline
S
L
P
Points 127 [Total 1239] Ratings 0 Comments 127 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 105 [Total 105] Ratings 0 Comments 105 Invitations 0 Offline
S
L
P
P
P
Points 75 [Total 3937] Ratings 0 Comments 75 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 72 [Total 72] Ratings 0 Comments 72 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 30 [Total 30] Ratings 3 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Offline
S
L
Points 25 [Total 4250] Ratings 1 Comments 15 Invitations 0 Offline
S
P
C
L
C
Points 10 [Total 1682] Ratings 1 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Offline
* Excludes moderators and previous
winners (Include)
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | © Purple Inc.