Question and answer
Analyze information about relationships among Congress, the military bureaucracies, and defense industries
Military?industrial complex, or military?industrial?congressional complex[1], is a concept commonly used to refer to policy and monetary relationships between legislators, national armed forces, and the defense industrial base that supports them. [ These relationships include political contributions, political approval for defense spending, lobbying to support bureaucracies, and oversight of the
industry. It is a type of iron triangle. The term is most often used in reference to the system behind the military of the United States, where it gained popularity after its use in the farewell address of President Dwight D. Eisenhower on January 17, 1961, though the term is applicable to any country with a similarly developed infrastructure. The term is sometimes used more broadly to include the entire network of contracts and flows of money and resources among individuals as well as corporations and institutions of the defense contractors, The Pentagon, the Congress and executive branch. This sector is intrinsically prone to principal?agent problem, moral hazard, and rent seeking. Cases of political corruption have also surfaced with regularity. A parallel system is that of the Military?industrial?media complex, along with the more distant Politico-media complex and Prison-industrial complex. A similar thesis was originally expressed by Daniel Gu?rin, in his 1936 book Fascism and Big Business, about the fascist government support to heavy industry. It can be defined as, "an informal and changing coalition of groups with vested psychological, moral, and material interests in the continuous development and maintenance of high levels of weaponry, in preservation of colonial markets and in military-strategic conceptions of internal affairs."[2] ]
Get an answer
Original conversation
User: Analyze information about relationships among Congress, the military bureaucracies, and defense industries

Weegy: Military?industrial complex, or military?industrial?congressional complex[1], is a concept commonly used to refer to policy and monetary relationships between legislators, national armed forces, and the defense industrial base that supports them. [ These relationships include political contributions, political approval for defense spending, lobbying to support bureaucracies, and oversight of the industry. It is a type of iron triangle. The term is most often used in reference to the system behind the military of the United States, where it gained popularity after its use in the farewell address of President Dwight D. Eisenhower on January 17, 1961, though the term is applicable to any country with a similarly developed infrastructure. The term is sometimes used more broadly to include the entire network of contracts and flows of money and resources among individuals as well as corporations and institutions of the defense contractors, The Pentagon, the Congress and executive branch. This sector is intrinsically prone to principal?agent problem, moral hazard, and rent seeking. Cases of political corruption have also surfaced with regularity. A parallel system is that of the Military?industrial?media complex, along with the more distant Politico-media complex and Prison-industrial complex. A similar thesis was originally expressed by Daniel Gu?rin, in his 1936 book Fascism and Big Business, about the fascist government support to heavy industry. It can be defined as, "an informal and changing coalition of groups with vested psychological, moral, and material interests in the continuous development and maintenance of high levels of weaponry, in preservation of colonial markets and in military-strategic conceptions of internal affairs."[2] ]
rocketmail|Points 363|

User: draw your own conclusion and support it with facts and persuasive reasoning about the impact of these relationships on defense spending





Weegy: These kinds of information are not publicly available
Expert answered|uxiali|Points 1101|

Question
Asked 1/2/2013 2:34:44 PM
0 Answers/Comments
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
19,254,791 questions answered
Popular Conversations
The square of a certain negative number is equal to five more than ...
Weegy: x^2 = 0.5x + 5 Quadratic formula gives solutions as: -2 and 2.5, but since x is negative, it's -2. User: ...
1/29/2015 9:17:38 AM| 4 Answers
7x + 2y = 4 y = x + 1 Solve the system of equations. no ...
Weegy: The best answer is B.11y = -55 User: The y-intercept of the line whose equation is 3x - 2y = 6 is -3 2 6 ...
1/29/2015 10:12:58 AM| 4 Answers
What is the resulting equation when the expression for y in the ...
Weegy: 3x + y = 1 3x + (6 - 4x) =1 3x + 6 - 4x =1 ............3x - 4x + 6 = 1.......-x + 6 = 1 The first choice... ...
1/29/2015 12:32:25 PM| 4 Answers
In your notebook, set up the following subtraction in a vertical ...
Weegy: Answer = 12 = (2.5/-5) x -6 = -2 x -6 =12 User: Identify the polynomial. a 2 + bcd 3 ...
1/29/2015 8:54:54 PM| 4 Answers
The slope of the line passing through the points (-1, 5) and (3, 5) ...
Weegy: (-1) * 5 = -5 User: what is the slope of the line passing thru (0,4) and (-8,-1) User: What is the slope of ...
1/29/2015 4:21:11 AM| 2 Answers
true or false. A pronoun is a noun substitute.
Weegy: They is a pronoun. User: true or false. A noun indicates the action in a sentence.
1/29/2015 8:22:51 AM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
Points 2094 [Total 2115]| Ratings 0| Comments 2094| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
P
L
P
Points 1428 [Total 6705]| Ratings 0| Comments 1428| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
1
L
P
P
L
P
P
Points 758 [Total 15769]| Ratings 1| Comments 748| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 438 [Total 1119]| Ratings 2| Comments 418| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
L
Points 334 [Total 7034]| Ratings 1| Comments 324| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 121 [Total 136]| Ratings 1| Comments 111| Invitations 0|Offline
S
P
C
L
P
L
1
Points 92 [Total 6680]| Ratings 1| Comments 82| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 85 [Total 1646]| Ratings 0| Comments 85| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 63 [Total 445]| Ratings 0| Comments 63| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 50 [Total 52]| Ratings 0| Comments 0| Invitations 5|Offline
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2014 Purple Inc.