Question and answer
Analyze information about relationships among Congress, the military bureaucracies, and defense industries
Military?industrial complex, or military?industrial?congressional complex[1], is a concept commonly used to refer to policy and monetary relationships between legislators, national armed forces, and the defense industrial base that supports them. [ These relationships include political contributions, political approval for defense spending, lobbying to support bureaucracies, and oversight of the
industry. It is a type of iron triangle. The term is most often used in reference to the system behind the military of the United States, where it gained popularity after its use in the farewell address of President Dwight D. Eisenhower on January 17, 1961, though the term is applicable to any country with a similarly developed infrastructure. The term is sometimes used more broadly to include the entire network of contracts and flows of money and resources among individuals as well as corporations and institutions of the defense contractors, The Pentagon, the Congress and executive branch. This sector is intrinsically prone to principal?agent problem, moral hazard, and rent seeking. Cases of political corruption have also surfaced with regularity. A parallel system is that of the Military?industrial?media complex, along with the more distant Politico-media complex and Prison-industrial complex. A similar thesis was originally expressed by Daniel Gu?rin, in his 1936 book Fascism and Big Business, about the fascist government support to heavy industry. It can be defined as, "an informal and changing coalition of groups with vested psychological, moral, and material interests in the continuous development and maintenance of high levels of weaponry, in preservation of colonial markets and in military-strategic conceptions of internal affairs."[2] ]
Get an answer
Original conversation
User: Analyze information about relationships among Congress, the military bureaucracies, and defense industries

Weegy: Military?industrial complex, or military?industrial?congressional complex[1], is a concept commonly used to refer to policy and monetary relationships between legislators, national armed forces, and the defense industrial base that supports them. [ These relationships include political contributions, political approval for defense spending, lobbying to support bureaucracies, and oversight of the industry. It is a type of iron triangle. The term is most often used in reference to the system behind the military of the United States, where it gained popularity after its use in the farewell address of President Dwight D. Eisenhower on January 17, 1961, though the term is applicable to any country with a similarly developed infrastructure. The term is sometimes used more broadly to include the entire network of contracts and flows of money and resources among individuals as well as corporations and institutions of the defense contractors, The Pentagon, the Congress and executive branch. This sector is intrinsically prone to principal?agent problem, moral hazard, and rent seeking. Cases of political corruption have also surfaced with regularity. A parallel system is that of the Military?industrial?media complex, along with the more distant Politico-media complex and Prison-industrial complex. A similar thesis was originally expressed by Daniel Gu?rin, in his 1936 book Fascism and Big Business, about the fascist government support to heavy industry. It can be defined as, "an informal and changing coalition of groups with vested psychological, moral, and material interests in the continuous development and maintenance of high levels of weaponry, in preservation of colonial markets and in military-strategic conceptions of internal affairs."[2] ]
rocketmail|Points 363|

User: draw your own conclusion and support it with facts and persuasive reasoning about the impact of these relationships on defense spending





Weegy: These kinds of information are not publicly available
Expert answered|uxiali|Points 1101|

Question
Asked 1/2/2013 2:34:44 PM
0 Answers/Comments
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
19,782,771 questions answered
Popular Conversations
Find the product. (0.5n 5)2(10n 7) 3
Weegy: Is there a second part to this question? such as C= 0.25n User: Find the product. (y 2)5 · y 8 Weegy: IF ...
3/4/2015 10:51:00 AM| 3 Answers
Who, whom, whose, which, and that are used to introduce dependent ...
Weegy: Earthen- resembling earth. User: What question does the adverb clause answer? I'll agree to your proposal ...
3/4/2015 4:24:41 PM| 3 Answers
Pakistan’s economy is _______________ dominant. ...
Weegy: Pakistan’s economy is _______________ dominant. MANUFACTURING
3/4/2015 3:52:35 AM| 2 Answers
Which sentence uses epigraph correctly? My father always signs his ...
Weegy: your answer is b.Several downtown buildings have been marred with a racist epigraph. Anything else? User: ...
3/4/2015 8:20:11 AM| 2 Answers
Which word is a synonym for secret? ...
3/4/2015 8:48:42 AM| 2 Answers
80, 90, 85, 95, 90, 100, 95, 105, __, ___, ___
Weegy: e the next three numbers in the sequence is 100, 110 and 105. [smile] User: 5 - 6 - 8 = Weegy: 3-3 = 0 ...
3/4/2015 9:00:09 AM| 2 Answers
Find the product. (-4·3·2)2 User: Find the product. (n 3)2 · (n ...
Weegy: that is a factor what you need to know? User: Find the product. (n ^3)^2 · (n^ 5)^4
3/4/2015 10:31:32 AM| 2 Answers
10^6
Weegy: 2 * 10 = 20 User: (100)6
3/4/2015 10:43:28 AM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
P
L
P
P
P
Points 293 [Total 8179]| Ratings 0| Comments 293| Invitations 0|Offline
S
P
C
L
P
L
1
P
Points 84 [Total 7391]| Ratings 0| Comments 84| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
Points 56 [Total 967]| Ratings 1| Comments 46| Invitations 0|Online
S
1
L
L
Points 52 [Total 7553]| Ratings 0| Comments 52| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 46 [Total 551]| Ratings 2| Comments 26| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 22 [Total 390]| Ratings 0| Comments 22| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 17 [Total 108]| Ratings 0| Comments 17| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 12 [Total 12]| Ratings 0| Comments 12| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 11 [Total 127]| Ratings 1| Comments 1| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 10 [Total 10]| Ratings 1| Comments 0| Invitations 0|Offline
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2014 Purple Inc.