Question and answer
Analyze information about relationships among Congress, the military bureaucracies, and defense industries
Military?industrial complex, or military?industrial?congressional complex[1], is a concept commonly used to refer to policy and monetary relationships between legislators, national armed forces, and the defense industrial base that supports them. [ These relationships include political contributions, political approval for defense spending, lobbying to support bureaucracies, and oversight of the
industry. It is a type of iron triangle. The term is most often used in reference to the system behind the military of the United States, where it gained popularity after its use in the farewell address of President Dwight D. Eisenhower on January 17, 1961, though the term is applicable to any country with a similarly developed infrastructure. The term is sometimes used more broadly to include the entire network of contracts and flows of money and resources among individuals as well as corporations and institutions of the defense contractors, The Pentagon, the Congress and executive branch. This sector is intrinsically prone to principal?agent problem, moral hazard, and rent seeking. Cases of political corruption have also surfaced with regularity. A parallel system is that of the Military?industrial?media complex, along with the more distant Politico-media complex and Prison-industrial complex. A similar thesis was originally expressed by Daniel Gu?rin, in his 1936 book Fascism and Big Business, about the fascist government support to heavy industry. It can be defined as, "an informal and changing coalition of groups with vested psychological, moral, and material interests in the continuous development and maintenance of high levels of weaponry, in preservation of colonial markets and in military-strategic conceptions of internal affairs."[2] ]
Get an answer
Original conversation
User: Analyze information about relationships among Congress, the military bureaucracies, and defense industries

Weegy: Military?industrial complex, or military?industrial?congressional complex[1], is a concept commonly used to refer to policy and monetary relationships between legislators, national armed forces, and the defense industrial base that supports them. [ These relationships include political contributions, political approval for defense spending, lobbying to support bureaucracies, and oversight of the industry. It is a type of iron triangle. The term is most often used in reference to the system behind the military of the United States, where it gained popularity after its use in the farewell address of President Dwight D. Eisenhower on January 17, 1961, though the term is applicable to any country with a similarly developed infrastructure. The term is sometimes used more broadly to include the entire network of contracts and flows of money and resources among individuals as well as corporations and institutions of the defense contractors, The Pentagon, the Congress and executive branch. This sector is intrinsically prone to principal?agent problem, moral hazard, and rent seeking. Cases of political corruption have also surfaced with regularity. A parallel system is that of the Military?industrial?media complex, along with the more distant Politico-media complex and Prison-industrial complex. A similar thesis was originally expressed by Daniel Gu?rin, in his 1936 book Fascism and Big Business, about the fascist government support to heavy industry. It can be defined as, "an informal and changing coalition of groups with vested psychological, moral, and material interests in the continuous development and maintenance of high levels of weaponry, in preservation of colonial markets and in military-strategic conceptions of internal affairs."[2] ]
rocketmail|Points 363|

User: draw your own conclusion and support it with facts and persuasive reasoning about the impact of these relationships on defense spending





Weegy: These kinds of information are not publicly available
Expert answered|uxiali|Points 1101|

Question
Asked 1/2/2013 2:34:44 PM
0 Answers/Comments
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
17,170,631 questions answered
Popular Conversations
what is the mode of 3, 7, 9, 2, 5, 3, 4, 6, 1, 0 User: {3, 7, 9, 2, ...
Weegy: I assume you mean divided by and the answer would be 1 User: {3, 7, 9, 2, 5, 3, 4, 6, 1, 0} the mode of these ...
8/28/2014 10:48:20 AM| 3 Answers
x/8-6>2
8/28/2014 2:19:03 PM| 3 Answers
Control programs are also known as
8/28/2014 2:34:02 AM| 2 Answers
Which individual or entity is responsible for conducting long-range ...
Weegy: Logistics section is responsible for conducting long-range and/or contingency planning. ........... User: ...
8/28/2014 6:22:01 AM| 2 Answers
My Section supports the incident response by overseeing contracting ...
Weegy: Answer: Logistics section Chief
8/28/2014 6:22:50 AM| 2 Answers
4(x-7)=2
Weegy: x - 2 = 7 x = 7 + 2 x = 9 User: 4t-13=57
8/28/2014 7:05:07 AM| 2 Answers
14 · (4 + 3)-1
8/28/2014 10:27:42 AM| 2 Answers
The symbol for the hydronium ion is _____. H+ H3O- H3O+ OH-
Weegy: The symbol for the hydroxide ion is OH- .
8/28/2014 11:35:15 AM| 2 Answers
the largest consumers of water
8/28/2014 12:55:58 PM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
R
L
1
1
P
C
1
P
1
1
L
P
C
P
C
1
P
C
L
P
C
1
P
C
P
C
Points 2531 [Total 24131]| Ratings 4| Comments 2491| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
1
L
Points 2171 [Total 6147]| Ratings 8| Comments 2091| Invitations 0|Online
S
L
C
P
C
1
L
L
Points 2078 [Total 15692]| Ratings 12| Comments 1958| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
P
C
L
P
C
P
C
L
P
C
P
C
P
C
Points 1940 [Total 16967]| Ratings 6| Comments 1880| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
1
1
1
1
L
1
Points 1844 [Total 9551]| Ratings 2| Comments 1824| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
P
C
P
C
1
L
P
C
L
P
C
P
C
P
C
P
C
Points 900 [Total 18471]| Ratings 0| Comments 900| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
L
Points 548 [Total 5112]| Ratings 0| Comments 548| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
1
L
P
P
L
Points 543 [Total 11204]| Ratings 1| Comments 533| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 410 [Total 613]| Ratings 1| Comments 400| Invitations 0|Online
S
Points 366 [Total 366]| Ratings 2| Comments 316| Invitations 3|Offline
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2014 Purple Inc.