Question and answer
What percentage of cases are dropped because of the exclusionary rule? (Points : 3) approximately 8% less than 10% more than 12% fewer than 2%
The primary purpose of the Exclusionary Rule "is to deter future unlawful police conduct and thereby effectuate the guarantee of the Fourth Amendment against unreasonable searches and seizures." (United States v. Calandra (1974) 414 U.S. [ [ 338 [38 L.Ed.2nd 561]; Illinois v. Krull (1987) 480 U.S. 340 [94 L.Ed.2nd 364]; People v. Robles (2000) 23 Cal.4th 789, 799.) "?[T]he "prime purpose" of
the [exclusionary] rule, if not the sole one, "is to deter future unlawful police conduct." [Citations]' (Citations)" (Italics added; People v. Sanders (2003) 31 Cal.4th 318, 324.) It is also the purpose of the Fourth Amendment to "safeguard the privacy and security of individuals against arbitrary invasions by government officials." (Camera v. Municipal Court (1967) 387 U.S. 523, 528 [18 L.Ed.2nd 930, 935].) An otherwise lawful seizure can violate the Fourth Amendment if it is executed in an unreasonable manner. (United States v. Alverez-Tejeda (9th Cir. 2007, citing United States v. Jacobsen (1984) 466 U.S. 109, 124 [80 L.Ed.2d 85].) Evidence illegally obtained by private persons, acting in a private capacity, is not subject to the Exclusionary Rule. (See Krauss v. Superior Court (1971) 5 Cal.3rd 418, 421; People v. North (1981) 29 Cal.3rd 509, 514; Jones v. Kmart Corp. (1998) 17 Cal.App.4th 329, 332.) Even a peace officer, when off-duty and acting in a private capacity, may be found to have acted as a private citizen. (See People v. Wachter (1976) 58 Cal.App.3rd 911, 920, 922.) However, the Exclusionary Rule is not intended to prevent all police misconduct or as a remedy for all police errors. "The use of the exclusionary rule is an exceptional remedy typically reserved for violations of constitutional rights." (United States v. Smith (9th Cir. 1999) 196 F.3rd 1034, 1040.) Not all courts are in agreement that such a remedy is reserved exclusively for constitutional violations. (See discussion in United States v. Lombera-Camorlinga (9th Cir. 2000) 206 F.3rd 882, 886-887, and in the dissenting opinion, p. 893.) A civil rights "action under (42 U.S.C.) section 1983 "encompasses violations of federal statutory law as well as constitutional law." (Maine v. Thiboutot (1980) 448 U.S. 1, 4, . . . ] ]
Expert answered|bluplemud|Points 60|
Question
Asked 6/18/2012 3:58:14 PM
0 Answers/Comments
Ask a question
Not a good answer? Get an answer now. (Free)
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
16,945,189 questions answered
Popular Conversations
Solve. (10x - 2) = 4
Weegy: 77 = 10x - 3; 77 + 3 = 10x; 80 = 10x; x = 80/10; x = 8 User: 1/6(10x - 2) = 4 Weegy: 77 = 10x - 3; 77 + 3 ...
7/26/2014 1:22:25 PM| 4 Answers
When is the May/June 2014 Waec result coming out?
Weegy: It is already out, to check the result please do the following: Waec Result Checker online for 2014 1 Enter ...
7/26/2014 3:07:28 AM| 2 Answers
People who have the genetic disorder called hemophilia suffer from ...
Weegy: People who have the genetic disorder called hemophilia suffer from abnormally low levels of oxygen in the blood ...
7/27/2014 6:19:14 AM| 2 Answers
calculate the sum of 1/4 and 1/5
Weegy: 1/4 + 1/5 = 9/20 User: calculate the sum of 1/9 and 1/4 Weegy: 1/9 + 1/8 = 17/72
7/27/2014 3:52:21 PM| 2 Answers
A peer group is a _______ group composed of equal age individuals ...
Weegy: A peer group is a primary group composed of equal age individuals with similar characteristics. User: The ...
7/27/2014 5:21:49 PM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
R
L
1
1
P
C
1
P
1
1
L
P
C
P
C
1
P
C
L
P
C
1
P
C
Points 2223 [Total 21223]| Ratings 1| Comments 2213| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
P
C
P
C
1
L
P
C
L
P
C
P
C
P
C
Points 2094 [Total 17223]| Ratings 0| Comments 2094| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
P
C
L
P
C
P
C
L
P
C
P
C
Points 1901 [Total 14456]| Ratings 1| Comments 1891| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
1
Points 1526 [Total 3709]| Ratings 2| Comments 1506| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
1
1
1
1
L
1
Points 1284 [Total 7461]| Ratings 2| Comments 1264| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
Points 1093 [Total 3229]| Ratings 7| Comments 1023| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
1
L
P
P
L
Points 920 [Total 10528]| Ratings 0| Comments 920| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
Points 806 [Total 4482]| Ratings 2| Comments 786| Invitations 0|Offline
S
P
C
L
P
L
1
Points 772 [Total 5826]| Ratings 4| Comments 732| Invitations 0|Online
S
Points 275 [Total 423]| Ratings 2| Comments 255| Invitations 0|Offline
Home | Contact | Archive | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2014 Purple Inc.