Question and answer
What percentage of cases are dropped because of the exclusionary rule? (Points : 3) approximately 8% less than 10% more than 12% fewer than 2%
The primary purpose of the Exclusionary Rule "is to deter future unlawful police conduct and thereby effectuate the guarantee of the Fourth Amendment against unreasonable searches and seizures." (United States v. Calandra (1974) 414 U.S. [ [ 338 [38 L.Ed.2nd 561]; Illinois v. Krull (1987) 480 U.S. 340 [94 L.Ed.2nd 364]; People v. Robles (2000) 23 Cal.4th 789, 799.) "?[T]he "prime purpose" of
the [exclusionary] rule, if not the sole one, "is to deter future unlawful police conduct." [Citations]' (Citations)" (Italics added; People v. Sanders (2003) 31 Cal.4th 318, 324.) It is also the purpose of the Fourth Amendment to "safeguard the privacy and security of individuals against arbitrary invasions by government officials." (Camera v. Municipal Court (1967) 387 U.S. 523, 528 [18 L.Ed.2nd 930, 935].) An otherwise lawful seizure can violate the Fourth Amendment if it is executed in an unreasonable manner. (United States v. Alverez-Tejeda (9th Cir. 2007, citing United States v. Jacobsen (1984) 466 U.S. 109, 124 [80 L.Ed.2d 85].) Evidence illegally obtained by private persons, acting in a private capacity, is not subject to the Exclusionary Rule. (See Krauss v. Superior Court (1971) 5 Cal.3rd 418, 421; People v. North (1981) 29 Cal.3rd 509, 514; Jones v. Kmart Corp. (1998) 17 Cal.App.4th 329, 332.) Even a peace officer, when off-duty and acting in a private capacity, may be found to have acted as a private citizen. (See People v. Wachter (1976) 58 Cal.App.3rd 911, 920, 922.) However, the Exclusionary Rule is not intended to prevent all police misconduct or as a remedy for all police errors. "The use of the exclusionary rule is an exceptional remedy typically reserved for violations of constitutional rights." (United States v. Smith (9th Cir. 1999) 196 F.3rd 1034, 1040.) Not all courts are in agreement that such a remedy is reserved exclusively for constitutional violations. (See discussion in United States v. Lombera-Camorlinga (9th Cir. 2000) 206 F.3rd 882, 886-887, and in the dissenting opinion, p. 893.) A civil rights "action under (42 U.S.C.) section 1983 "encompasses violations of federal statutory law as well as constitutional law." (Maine v. Thiboutot (1980) 448 U.S. 1, 4, . . . ] ]
Expert answered|bluplemud|Points 60|
Question
Asked 6/18/2012 3:58:14 PM
0 Answers/Comments
Get an answer
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
19,144,729 questions answered
Popular Conversations
Which is the subordinate clause in the sentence? Some additional ...
Weegy: The subordinate clause in the sentence - Some additional clues were found when a small pit, with linen bags and ...
1/25/2015 12:11:26 AM| 1 Answers
Which of the following was true of Nixon's presidency? A. It ...
Weegy: D. It oversaw the establishment of the Environmental Protection Agency. Is true of Nixon's presidency. User: ...
1/25/2015 12:16:49 AM| 1 Answers
Simplify the expression: 3 square root of 5/64
1/25/2015 12:29:25 AM| 1 Answers
Determine the equation of g(x) that results from translating the ...
Weegy: The equation of g(x) that results from translating the function f(x) = x^2 + 1 upward 2 units is g(x) = x^2 + 3. ...
1/25/2015 12:57:14 AM| 1 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
Points 1655 [Total 1676]| Ratings 0| Comments 1655| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
P
L
P
Points 1229 [Total 6506]| Ratings 0| Comments 1229| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
1
L
P
P
L
P
P
Points 563 [Total 15574]| Ratings 0| Comments 563| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 438 [Total 1119]| Ratings 2| Comments 418| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
L
Points 178 [Total 6878]| Ratings 0| Comments 178| Invitations 0|Online
S
P
C
L
P
L
1
Points 90 [Total 6678]| Ratings 1| Comments 80| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 87 [Total 102]| Ratings 0| Comments 87| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 73 [Total 1634]| Ratings 0| Comments 73| Invitations 0|Online
S
Points 63 [Total 445]| Ratings 0| Comments 63| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 50 [Total 52]| Ratings 0| Comments 0| Invitations 5|Offline
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2014 Purple Inc.