Question and answer
What percentage of cases are dropped because of the exclusionary rule? (Points : 3) approximately 8% less than 10% more than 12% fewer than 2%
The primary purpose of the Exclusionary Rule "is to deter future unlawful police conduct and thereby effectuate the guarantee of the Fourth Amendment against unreasonable searches and seizures." (United States v. Calandra (1974) 414 U.S. [ [ 338 [38 L.Ed.2nd 561]; Illinois v. Krull (1987) 480 U.S. 340 [94 L.Ed.2nd 364]; People v. Robles (2000) 23 Cal.4th 789, 799.) "?[T]he "prime purpose" of
the [exclusionary] rule, if not the sole one, "is to deter future unlawful police conduct." [Citations]' (Citations)" (Italics added; People v. Sanders (2003) 31 Cal.4th 318, 324.) It is also the purpose of the Fourth Amendment to "safeguard the privacy and security of individuals against arbitrary invasions by government officials." (Camera v. Municipal Court (1967) 387 U.S. 523, 528 [18 L.Ed.2nd 930, 935].) An otherwise lawful seizure can violate the Fourth Amendment if it is executed in an unreasonable manner. (United States v. Alverez-Tejeda (9th Cir. 2007, citing United States v. Jacobsen (1984) 466 U.S. 109, 124 [80 L.Ed.2d 85].) Evidence illegally obtained by private persons, acting in a private capacity, is not subject to the Exclusionary Rule. (See Krauss v. Superior Court (1971) 5 Cal.3rd 418, 421; People v. North (1981) 29 Cal.3rd 509, 514; Jones v. Kmart Corp. (1998) 17 Cal.App.4th 329, 332.) Even a peace officer, when off-duty and acting in a private capacity, may be found to have acted as a private citizen. (See People v. Wachter (1976) 58 Cal.App.3rd 911, 920, 922.) However, the Exclusionary Rule is not intended to prevent all police misconduct or as a remedy for all police errors. "The use of the exclusionary rule is an exceptional remedy typically reserved for violations of constitutional rights." (United States v. Smith (9th Cir. 1999) 196 F.3rd 1034, 1040.) Not all courts are in agreement that such a remedy is reserved exclusively for constitutional violations. (See discussion in United States v. Lombera-Camorlinga (9th Cir. 2000) 206 F.3rd 882, 886-887, and in the dissenting opinion, p. 893.) A civil rights "action under (42 U.S.C.) section 1983 "encompasses violations of federal statutory law as well as constitutional law." (Maine v. Thiboutot (1980) 448 U.S. 1, 4, . . . ] ]
Expert answered|bluplemud|Points 60|
Question
Asked 6/18/2012 3:58:14 PM
0 Answers/Comments
Get an answer
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
For a right to be clearly established for purposes of defeating a claim of qualified immunity, the right must be sufficiently clear that a reasonable official would understand that what they are doing violates the right. (Points : 2) True False
Question
Not Answered
Updated 25 days ago|8/10/2015 8:39:47 AM
1 Answer/Comment
For a right to be clearly established for purposes of defeating a claim of qualified immunity, the right must be sufficiently clear that a reasonable official would understand that what they are doing violates the right. TRUE
Added 25 days ago|8/10/2015 8:39:47 AM
This answer has been confirmed as correct, not copied, and helpful.
Confirmed by jeifunk [8/10/2015 9:36:24 AM]
22,003,979 questions answered
Popular Conversations
precipitation
Weegy: Precipitation in chemistry is the creation of a solid in a solution or inside another solid during a chemical ...
9/4/2015 7:21:31 AM| 2 Answers
Charles de Montesquieu thought the government should be divided into ...
Weegy: Charles de Montesquieu thought the government should be divided into three branches of government. What is this ...
9/4/2015 11:03:20 AM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
1
L
L
P
R
Points 150 [Total 9473]| Ratings 0| Comments 150| Invitations 0|Online
S
L
L
P
1
Points 122 [Total 9432]| Ratings 1| Comments 112| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 85 [Total 390]| Ratings 0| Comments 85| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 49 [Total 833]| Ratings 0| Comments 49| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 39 [Total 572]| Ratings 0| Comments 39| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 32 [Total 32]| Ratings 1| Comments 12| Invitations 1|Offline
S
Points 24 [Total 29]| Ratings 1| Comments 4| Invitations 1|Offline
S
Points 20 [Total 208]| Ratings 0| Comments 20| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 11 [Total 67]| Ratings 0| Comments 11| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 10 [Total 10]| Ratings 0| Comments 0| Invitations 1|Offline
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2015 Purple Inc.