Question and answer
What percentage of cases are dropped because of the exclusionary rule? (Points : 3) approximately 8% less than 10% more than 12% fewer than 2%
The primary purpose of the Exclusionary Rule "is to deter future unlawful police conduct and thereby effectuate the guarantee of the Fourth Amendment against unreasonable searches and seizures." (United States v. Calandra (1974) 414 U.S. [ [ 338 [38 L.Ed.2nd 561]; Illinois v. Krull (1987) 480 U.S. 340 [94 L.Ed.2nd 364]; People v. Robles (2000) 23 Cal.4th 789, 799.) "?[T]he "prime purpose" of
the [exclusionary] rule, if not the sole one, "is to deter future unlawful police conduct." [Citations]' (Citations)" (Italics added; People v. Sanders (2003) 31 Cal.4th 318, 324.) It is also the purpose of the Fourth Amendment to "safeguard the privacy and security of individuals against arbitrary invasions by government officials." (Camera v. Municipal Court (1967) 387 U.S. 523, 528 [18 L.Ed.2nd 930, 935].) An otherwise lawful seizure can violate the Fourth Amendment if it is executed in an unreasonable manner. (United States v. Alverez-Tejeda (9th Cir. 2007, citing United States v. Jacobsen (1984) 466 U.S. 109, 124 [80 L.Ed.2d 85].) Evidence illegally obtained by private persons, acting in a private capacity, is not subject to the Exclusionary Rule. (See Krauss v. Superior Court (1971) 5 Cal.3rd 418, 421; People v. North (1981) 29 Cal.3rd 509, 514; Jones v. Kmart Corp. (1998) 17 Cal.App.4th 329, 332.) Even a peace officer, when off-duty and acting in a private capacity, may be found to have acted as a private citizen. (See People v. Wachter (1976) 58 Cal.App.3rd 911, 920, 922.) However, the Exclusionary Rule is not intended to prevent all police misconduct or as a remedy for all police errors. "The use of the exclusionary rule is an exceptional remedy typically reserved for violations of constitutional rights." (United States v. Smith (9th Cir. 1999) 196 F.3rd 1034, 1040.) Not all courts are in agreement that such a remedy is reserved exclusively for constitutional violations. (See discussion in United States v. Lombera-Camorlinga (9th Cir. 2000) 206 F.3rd 882, 886-887, and in the dissenting opinion, p. 893.) A civil rights "action under (42 U.S.C.) section 1983 "encompasses violations of federal statutory law as well as constitutional law." (Maine v. Thiboutot (1980) 448 U.S. 1, 4, . . . ] ]
Expert answered|bluplemud|Points 60|
Question
Asked 6/18/2012 3:58:14 PM
0 Answers/Comments
Get an answer
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
18,057,756 questions answered
Popular Conversations
How would you rewrite the equation 2x + 4y + 2 = 3y + 5 in general ...
Weegy: FOIL (First Outside Inside Last) = 2x(2x) + 2x(-3y) + (-3y)(2x) + (-3y)(-3y) = 4x^2 + (-6xy) + (-6xy) + ...
10/30/2014 6:28:25 PM| 4 Answers
Solve the following equation. x + 6 = x + x 2 6 14 72 User: ...
Weegy: I'm sorry, do you have a question I can help you with today? User: Solve for A. BA + C = D A = D - B - C A ...
10/30/2014 9:06:00 AM| 3 Answers
What is the slope of the line that has the equation 4x + 2y = 12?
Weegy: The slope of the line that has the equation 4x + 2y = 12 is -2. User: What is the y-intercept of the line ...
10/30/2014 6:21:18 PM| 3 Answers
Prior to the Seventeenth Amendment, who chose the members of the US ...
Weegy: Prior to the Seventeenth Amendment, State legislatures chose the members of the US Senate. User: Prior to ...
10/30/2014 7:05:25 AM| 2 Answers
______________ means to enclose something tightly, such as is done ...
Weegy: Embedding means to enclose something tightly, such as is done with stones or tiles, and a filler, when creating ...
10/30/2014 7:30:45 AM| 2 Answers
In a plane, if two lines are perpendicular to the same line, then ...
Weegy: Two lines parallel to the same plane are parallel to each other. TRUE. User: Congruent triangles are any two ...
10/30/2014 8:12:29 AM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
1
1
1
1
L
1
L
Points 3275 [Total 15650]| Ratings 0| Comments 3275| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
1
L
P
C
1
P
C
1
L
Points 2137 [Total 11618]| Ratings 5| Comments 2087| Invitations 0|Online
S
1
L
1
L
P
P
L
Points 1114 [Total 13343]| Ratings 1| Comments 1104| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 888 [Total 2287]| Ratings 0| Comments 888| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 680 [Total 681]| Ratings 7| Comments 610| Invitations 0|Online
S
1
L
L
Points 567 [Total 6361]| Ratings 3| Comments 537| Invitations 0|Online
S
Points 482 [Total 482]| Ratings 0| Comments 452| Invitations 3|Offline
S
Points 473 [Total 473]| Ratings 1| Comments 463| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 79 [Total 1296]| Ratings 1| Comments 69| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
Points 65 [Total 683]| Ratings 0| Comments 65| Invitations 0|Offline
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2014 Purple Inc.