Notice: Payments for answers will end 4/10/2017. Click for more info.
You have new items in your feed. Click to view.
Question and answer
Q: To support a scientific hypothesis, one might (Points : 1) gather data that confirms the hypothesis. look for ways of refuting the hypothesis. Both A and B None of the
above
A: 1) gather data that confirms the hypothesis.
Get an answer
Original conversation
User: To support a scientific hypothesis, one might (Points : 1) gather data that confirms the hypothesis. look for ways of refuting the hypothesis. Both A and B None of the above

Weegy: 1) gather data that confirms the hypothesis.
teacheryna|Points 171|

User: 9. An inactive substance or simulated medical procedure is called a (Points : 1) placenta. placebo. platypus. pleonasm

Weegy: placebo
nothinganon|Points 774|

User: 6. A good way to establish a conclusion as true, or probable, is to (Points : 1) insist that you are correct. construct a strong argument. construct a fallacious argument. ignore any objections to your conclusion.

User: 5. A scientific hypothesis is (Points : 1) a tentative claim to be tested. a clever remark designed to confuse an audience. an appeal to radical skepticism. a valid argument

Weegy: A scientific hypothesis is a.a tentative claim to be tested.
debnjerry|Points 48893|

User: 4. Putting an argument into premise-conclusion form can make it easier to (Points : 1) ignore the argument. think the argument is pretty. evaluate the argument. avoid the argument

Weegy: c.evaluate the argument.
rachell028|Points 1052|

User: 3. Logicians regard the following as the meaning of the word "argument." (Points : 1) A hostile and emotional dispute A poetic tribute to Spring A set of reasons put forth to support a claim The kind of thing one has with a spouse

Weegy: Logicians regard the following is the meaning of the word "argument": A set of reasons put forth to support a claim.
AngelInDisguise|Points 5101|

User: 2. "If I move to Texas, I will need air conditioning. I don't need air conditioning. So I didn't move to Texas" is an argument form known as (Points : 1) modus ponens. modus spumoni. modus operandi. modus tollens

Weegy: The answer is modus tollens.
Fanboy|Points 2821|

User: 1. A strongly supported claim in science should be regarded as (Points : 1) correct, but something that can always be revised. necessarily true. meaningless but fun. correct, and never needing revision.

Weegy: The statement , A strongly supported claim in science should be regarded as 1.correct, but something that can always be revised.
bongche|Points 3864|

User: 1. <21{1[1(01)01]}> Since Jessica’s participation in local politics increased significantly after she joined her school’s political science club, it is clear that her involvement in that club led her to take an interest in politics. The argument above is flawed because (Points : 1) it doesn’t say which political issues Jessica is interested in it states that the only purpose of the political science club is to spark an interest in politics it misuses the word “significantly” it’s possible that an interest in politics caused Jessica to join the political science club

Weegy: D) it's possible that an interest in politics caused Jessica to join the political science club
jeifunk|Points 9995|

User: 2. <11{1[4(23)23]}> People have claimed that Jamie’s paintings have given them the blues. Clearly this cannot be entirely correct, since many of Jamie’s paintings contain no blue at all. The argument above is flawed because the author (Points : 1) provides no evidence misinterprets a key term relies on contradictory facts is not a noted painting expert

Weegy: The argument above is flawed because the author misinterprets a key term/
Butterflybaby|Points 1069|

User: 3. <11{1[2(06)06]}> Reporter: A new campaign finance reform bill being considered by Congress would limit the amount of campaign contributions that political candidates can receive. However, a survey of candidates running for mayor, governor, and senate seats shows that not one of them favors the bill. Clearly, there is no desire among politicians to limit campaign contributions. Which one of the following points out the flaw in the reporter’s argument above? (Points : 1) The reporter doesn’t indicate the amount that the new bill would limit campaign contributions. The evidence provided by the reporter suggests that most politicians are in favor of the new bill. The reporter wrongly assumes that no politician has ever supported a bill intended to limit campaign contributions The views of candidates currently running for office do not necessarily represent the views of all politicians.

Weegy: The reporter wrongly assumes that no politician has ever supported a bill intended to limit campaign contributions....Hecould have worked on the history of such bills and mentioned tht how many such bills were ever passed
uxiali|Points 1590|

User: 4. <11{1[3(02)02]}> Catherine goes to her local movie theater only to see romantic comedies. Since Catherine did not go to the movies yesterday, there is not a romantic comedy playing at her local theater. The reasoning above is flawed because the evidence (Points : 1) does not suggest that Catherine goes to see every romantic comedy that plays at her local movie theater implies that Catherine is uninterested in most types of movies does not indicate whether Catherine watches only romantic comedies at home suggests that Catherine’s local movie theater hardly ever shows romantic comedies

Weegy: The reasoning above is flawed because the evidence does not suggest that Catherine goes to see every romantic comedy that plays at her local movie theater.
debnjerry|Points 48893|

User: 5. <11{1[4(17)17]}> Mrs. Orlof teaches two history classes, one in the morning and one in the afternoon. Yesterday she gave the same test to both classes. Anyone who failed the test must take a retest. Since a greater percentage of students who took the morning test failed the test than students who took the afternoon test, more of Orlof’s morning history students than afternoon history students will have to take the retest. The conclusion above is not necessarily valid because (Points : 1) more students in the morning class may have passed the test than failed the test some students may have been absent from both classes some of the students who passed the afternoon test may have received information about the test from morning students more students may have taken the test in the afternoon than in the morning

Weegy: You have not included all the multiple choice options. But it is : C.some of the students who passed the afternoon test may have received information about the test from morning students
howareyou|Points 160|

User: 6. <21{1[1(13)13]}> A recent study of 100 employees from six departments of a major corporation found 65% to be sleep deprived. The researchers concluded that the majority of corporate employees are sleep deprived. The researcher’s conclusion is suspect because it (Points : 1) assumes that corporate employees are more sleep deprived than other people is based on evidence that is statistically impossible fails to describe the effects the sleep deprivation has relies on a sample that is too small to represent the entire corporate workforce

Weegy: D.) relies on a sample that is too small to represent the entire corporate workforce
sueschil|Points 100|

User: 7. <11{2[3(11)35]}> Some politicians claim to support the environment in speeches they make around the country. However, to get to those speeches they ride in gas guzzling, pollution creating private planes. They therefore clearly don’t believe a word of what they say and are actually making the environmental problem worse. Which one of the following, if true, would best weaken the argument above? (Points : 1) Some of the politicians try to hide the fact that they travel by private plane to their speeches around the country. Most people who hear the politicians’ speeches on the environment are unconvinced by their arguments. A majority of voters surveyed agree that politicians sometimes make society’s problems worse. Improvements to the environment brought about through the politicians’ public support of environmental regulations more than offset the damage done to the environment by the politicians’ private planes.

Weegy: Answer is D) Improvements to the environment brought about through the politicians? public support of environmental regulations more than offset the damage done to the environment by the politicians? private planes.
samn|Points 4057|

Question
Asked 7/21/2013 2:49:58 PM
0 Answers/Comments
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
26,523,527 questions answered
Popular Conversations
What is the primary mission of the Department of Homeland ...
Weegy: The primary mission of the Department of Homeland Security is " ensuring that the United States and its citizens ...
12/12/2017 7:12:59 AM| 4 Answers
This year, after a lengthy, noisy debate, they decided to take ...
Weegy: This year, after a lengthy, noisy debate, they decided to take separate vacations. This is a Simple Sentence. ...
12/10/2017 4:51:34 AM| 4 Answers
Which one of the following types of sentences gives a command or ...
Weegy: Do your work! The sentence above is an example of an IMPERATIVE sentence. User: Which one of the following ...
12/8/2017 6:12:32 AM| 3 Answers
How is the infinitive phrase used in the sentence? To write a novel ...
Weegy: I hope to convince them of my idea. The infinitive phrase "to convince them of my idea" is used as a NOUN. ...
12/2/2017 11:35:31 AM| 2 Answers
In order to maintain good hygiene it is best to reserve your bed for ...
Weegy: In order to maintain good "sleep hygiene" it is best to reserve your bed for sleeping and to engage in all other ...
12/3/2017 9:06:09 AM| 2 Answers
Which article of the Constitution grants powers to the legislative ...
Weegy: Article Three of the United States Constitution establishes the judicial branch of the federal government. ...
12/3/2017 8:21:45 PM| 2 Answers
A scientific _______ is a principle that describes the behavior of a ...
Weegy: A scientific LAW is a principle that describes the behavior of a natural phenomenon. User: The gradient of ...
12/4/2017 2:17:59 PM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
Points 89 [Total 105] Ratings 4 Comments 49 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 18 [Total 18] Ratings 0 Comments 8 Invitations 1 Offline
S
Points 10 [Total 10] Ratings 1 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 5 [Total 5] Ratings 0 Comments 5 Invitations 0 Offline
S
P
L
P
Points 1 [Total 166] Ratings 0 Comments 1 Invitations 0 Offline
* Excludes moderators and previous
winners (Include)
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | © Purple Inc.