Question and answer
Question not found
Ask a question
Not a good answer? Get an answer now. (Free)
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
-5a2;a=-2
Weegy: -5a2;a=-2; -5(-2)^2; -5(4); Answer is -20 (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 7/25/2012 7:15:02 AM
0 Answers/Comments
At issue in the twenty-first century is the trade-off between the necessity of writers, musicians, artists, and movie studios to profit from their work and the free flow of ideas for the public benefit. Movie (and music) industry participants claim that encryption programs are necessary to prevent piracy. Others, however, including the defendants in cases such as Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Corley, 273 F.3d 429 (2d Cir. 2001), argue that the law should at least allow purchasers of movies, ...
Weegy: i think that if you purchase any media you should be able to make personnel copies of it unlimited because it the value of the media usually decreases after opening it anyway and because it is necessary to have a back up copy! however i do think it [ [ [ would be tough to find a common ground on the decision. ] ] ] User: At issue in the twenty-first century is the trade-off between the necessity of writers, musicians, artists, and movie studios to profit from their work and the free flow of ideas for the public benefit. Movie (and music) industry participants claim that encryption programs are necessary to prevent piracy. Others, however, including the defendants in cases such as Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Corley, 273 F.3d 429 (2d Cir. 2001), argue that the law should at least allow purchasers of movies, music, and books in digital form to make limited copies for fair use. Which side of this debate do you support? Is it possible to strike an appropriate balance between the rights of both groups on this issue? Weegy: i think that if you purchase any media you should be able to make personnel copies of it unlimited because it the value of the media usually decreases after opening it anyway and because it is necessary to have a back up copy! however i do think it [ [ [ would be tough to find a common ground on the decision. ] ] ] (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 7/25/2012 7:19:36 AM
0 Answers/Comments
At issue in the twenty-first century is the trade-off between the necessity of writers, musicians, artists, and movie studios to profit from their work and the free flow of ideas for the public benefit. Movie (and music) industry participants claim that encryption programs are necessary to prevent piracy. Others, however, including the defendants in cases such as Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Corley, 273 F.3d 429 (2d Cir. 2001), argue that the law should at least allow purchasers of movies, ...
Weegy: i think that if you purchase any media you should be able to make personnel copies of it unlimited because it the value of the media usually decreases after opening it anyway and because it is necessary to have a back up copy! however i do think it [ [ [ [ would be tough to find a common ground on the decision. ] ] ] ] (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 7/25/2012 7:21:57 AM
0 Answers/Comments
At issue in the twenty-first century is the trade-off between the necessity of writers, musicians, artists, and movie studios to profit from their work and the free flow of ideas for the public benefit. Movie (and music) industry participants claim that encryption programs are necessary to prevent piracy. Others, however, including the defendants in cases such as Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Corley, 273 F.3d 429 (2d Cir. 2001), argue that the law should at least allow purchasers of movies, ...
Weegy: i think that if you purchase any media you should be able to make personnel copies of it unlimited because it the value of the media usually decreases after opening it anyway and because it is necessary to have a back up copy! however i do think it [ [ [ [ would be tough to find a common ground on the decision. ] ] ] ] User: • Is it possible to strike an appropriate balance between the rights of both groups on this issue? Weegy: You have the right to make a copy of any private property you own. However, that puts no obligation on the seller to make it easy for you. I have purchased a car, I have the right to make a duplicate of it as long as I don't sell it. [ But just because I have the right to make a duplicate of my car, does not mean I have the ability, and the car manufacturer has no obligation to make it easy for me. Given enough time and resources I could make an exact duplicate of the car I purchased. Any encryption can be broken, and given enough time and resources I can break the encryption and make an exact duplicate of any digital materials I purchase. But the manufacturer is under no obligation to help me or make it easy for me. All purchases are voluntary, if you don't like the fact that the manufacturer puts encryption on a product they sell, you don't have to buy it. Once you voluntarily agree to buy it, knowing that it is encrypted, then you have the right to make a copy of it, if you are willing to spend the time and resources necessary. Source: ] (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 7/25/2012 7:28:30 AM
0 Answers/Comments
At issue in the twenty-first century is the trade-off between the necessity of writers, musicians, artists, and movie studios to profit from their work and the free flow of ideas for the public benefit. Movie (and music) industry participants claim that encryption programs are necessary to prevent piracy. Others, however, including the defendants in cases such as Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Corley, 273 F.3d 429 (2d Cir. 2001), argue that the law should at least allow purchasers of movies, ...
Weegy: i think that if you purchase any media you should be able to make personnel copies of it unlimited because it the value of the media usually decreases after opening it anyway and because it is necessary to have a back up copy! however i do think it [ [ [ would be tough to find a common ground on the decision. ] ] ] User: • Is it possible to strike an appropriate balance between the rights of both groups on this issue? Weegy: Your question has one major FLAW. You are assuming the BOTH sides have rights. They do not. Artists, musicians, writers and others have ABSOLUTE control over their works and how they might be consumed, or distributed. [ The only right the public has is to buy it under the conditions offered or move on to something else. How would you define "limited" copies? How can you "limit" copies with existing technology? "Fair use" is just a meaningless phrase. The court will most likely decide that NOTHING is free and if you want it, you got to buy it. ] User: can you answer in your own opinion? Is it possible to strike an appropriate balance between the rights of both groups on this issue Weegy: I support the laws against piracy because this is the only protection of all the artists and the studios they are in. Each of them should have an agreement and contract on how they will going to release the copies for them to stay in good harmony. [ Trades are very common for personal growth of the artist and also for them to explore as well as the studios. ] (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 7/25/2012 7:44:04 AM
0 Answers/Comments
21,943,054 questions answered
Popular Conversations
The Dietary Guidelines for Americans include all of the following ...
Weegy: D. do not drink alcoho User: What components of a food label can help consumers compare the amounts of ...
8/29/2015 2:28:18 AM| 2 Answers
Which of these religions is ...
8/29/2015 5:14:54 AM| 1 Answers
Who was at the top of the caste ...
8/29/2015 5:35:57 AM| 1 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
P
C
L
P
L
1
P
P
1
P
1
P
L
P
R
Points 1278 [Total 11631]| Ratings 7| Comments 1208| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 798 [Total 1113]| Ratings 1| Comments 788| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
L
Points 754 [Total 9222]| Ratings 3| Comments 714| Invitations 1|Offline
S
L
L
P
1
Points 737 [Total 9310]| Ratings 2| Comments 717| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 541 [Total 767]| Ratings 1| Comments 531| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 242 [Total 250]| Ratings 0| Comments 242| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 224 [Total 224]| Ratings 3| Comments 194| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 214 [Total 533]| Ratings 1| Comments 204| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 178 [Total 255]| Ratings 0| Comments 178| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 144 [Total 175]| Ratings 0| Comments 144| Invitations 0|Offline
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2015 Purple Inc.