Question and answer
The District Court ruled that the evidence did not meet the applicable "general acceptance" standard for the admission of expert testimony. Finally, the United States Supreme Court held that, under
the Federal Rules of Evidence, not Frye, that the evidence did not meet the standard for admitting expert testimony in a federal trial. Which case? (Points : 4) Miranda v Arizona William v. Florida Wells v. Daubert Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc.
Get an answer
Original conversation
User: The District Court ruled that the evidence did not meet the applicable "general acceptance" standard for the admission of expert testimony. Finally, the United States Supreme Court held that, under the Federal Rules of Evidence, not Frye, that the evidence did not meet the standard for admitting expert testimony in a federal trial. Which case? (Points : 4) Miranda v Arizona William v. Florida Wells v. Daubert Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Weegy: Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc.
Airyna|Points 80|

User: According to the courts any new evidence seized, resulting from unreasonably seized evidence, is also tainted and is not admissible in court. This is based on the: (Points : 4) Bad evidence doctrine Fruits of the poisonous tree doctrine Illegal seizure doctrine Unreasonable search doctrine

Weegy: Stolen evidence is not admissible because it could be tampered with once it was stolen.
Expert answered|Airyna|Points 80|

User: According to the courts any new evidence seized, resulting from unreasonably seized evidence, is also tainted and is not admissible in court. This is based on the: (Points : 4) Bad evidence doctrine Fruits of the poisonous tree doctrine Illegal seizure doctrine Unreasonable search doctrine

Weegy: Stolen evidence is not admissible because it could be tampered with once it was stolen.
Expert answered|Airyna|Points 80|



Question
Asked 7/4/2012 3:29:48 PM
0 Answers/Comments
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
In the case of _________, the Supreme Court ruled that in assessing the admissibility of new and unique scientific tests, the trial judge did not have to rely solely on concept of "general acceptance." (Points : 4) Michigan v. Tyler Frye v. United States Coppolino v. State Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals
Weegy: Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc. (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Updated 7/4/2012 3:47:36 PM
2 Answers/Comments
Good answer
Added 7/4/2012 3:34:21 PM
Flagged by debnjerry
Please don't add comments just to say good answer. Add something of value to the conversations but correcting wrong answers or adding additional information.
Added 7/4/2012 3:47:36 PM
A(n) ___________ is a person who can demonstrate a particular skill or has knowledge in a trade or profession that will help the court determine the truth of the matter at issue. (Points : 4) Lay person Professional Witness Expert Witness Factual Witness
Question
Not Answered
Updated 12/31/2014 10:45:06 PM
1 Answer/Comment


An Expert Witness is a person who can demonstrate a particular skill or has knowledge in a trade or profession that will help the court determine the truth of the matter at issue.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expert_witness
Added 12/31/2014 10:45:06 PM
23,905,188 questions answered
Popular Conversations
Weegy Stuff
S
Points 301 [Total 698] Ratings 0 Comments 301 Invitations 0 Offline
S
P
P
L
Points 206 [Total 1013] Ratings 0 Comments 206 Invitations 0 Offline
S
1
L
L
P
R
P
L
P
Points 120 [Total 11293] Ratings 0 Comments 120 Invitations 0 Offline
S
L
P
Points 46 [Total 2114] Ratings 0 Comments 46 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 17 [Total 301] Ratings 0 Comments 17 Invitations 0 Offline
S
R
Points 11 [Total 447] Ratings 0 Comments 11 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 4 [Total 904] Ratings 0 Comments 4 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 2 [Total 2] Ratings 0 Comments 2 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 1 [Total 2] Ratings 0 Comments 1 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 1 [Total 1] Ratings 0 Comments 1 Invitations 0 Online
* Excludes moderators and previous
winners (Include)