Question and answer
The District Court ruled that the evidence did not meet the applicable "general acceptance" standard for the admission of expert testimony. Finally, the United States Supreme Court held that, under
the Federal Rules of Evidence, not Frye, that the evidence did not meet the standard for admitting expert testimony in a federal trial. Which case? (Points : 4) Miranda v Arizona William v. Florida Wells v. Daubert Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc.
Get an answer
Original conversation
User: The District Court ruled that the evidence did not meet the applicable "general acceptance" standard for the admission of expert testimony. Finally, the United States Supreme Court held that, under the Federal Rules of Evidence, not Frye, that the evidence did not meet the standard for admitting expert testimony in a federal trial. Which case? (Points : 4) Miranda v Arizona William v. Florida Wells v. Daubert Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Weegy: Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc.
Airyna|Points 80|

User: According to the courts any new evidence seized, resulting from unreasonably seized evidence, is also tainted and is not admissible in court. This is based on the: (Points : 4) Bad evidence doctrine Fruits of the poisonous tree doctrine Illegal seizure doctrine Unreasonable search doctrine

Weegy: Stolen evidence is not admissible because it could be tampered with once it was stolen.
Expert answered|Airyna|Points 80|

User: According to the courts any new evidence seized, resulting from unreasonably seized evidence, is also tainted and is not admissible in court. This is based on the: (Points : 4) Bad evidence doctrine Fruits of the poisonous tree doctrine Illegal seizure doctrine Unreasonable search doctrine

Weegy: Stolen evidence is not admissible because it could be tampered with once it was stolen.
Expert answered|Airyna|Points 80|



Question
Asked 7/4/2012 3:29:48 PM
0 Answers/Comments
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
17,203,931 questions answered
Popular Conversations
1. Write using exponents. (–4)(–4)
Weegy: Hi! (-4)(-4) is equal to (-4)^2 User: Simplify. Show your work. 5 1/3 +(-3 9/18) Weegy: 5 1/3 +(-3 9/18) ...
9/2/2014 6:06:05 PM| 3 Answers
Consider this quote: "In each of these historical instances . . . ...
Weegy: D. it stands for the omission of only a single word. User: Which of the following statements correctly ...
9/1/2014 8:30:28 AM| 2 Answers
The invasion of this region temporarily halted the fighting between ...
Weegy: The invasion of A.Korea halted the the fighting between the KMT and CPC. User: The letters DMZ stand for ...
9/1/2014 3:12:20 PM| 2 Answers
what is a complex sentence
Weegy: User: what is a simple sentence Weegy: User: what is a compound sentence Weegy: A compound sentence ...
9/1/2014 5:04:39 PM| 2 Answers
Every set of three points is coplanar.
9/1/2014 7:59:14 PM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
1
L
P
C
1
Points 224 [Total 6757]| Ratings 0| Comments 224| Invitations 0|Offline
S
R
L
1
1
P
C
1
P
1
1
L
P
C
P
C
1
P
C
L
P
C
1
P
C
P
C
P
C
Points 222 [Total 24621]| Ratings 0| Comments 222| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
C
P
C
1
L
L
P
C
1
Points 182 [Total 16121]| Ratings 1| Comments 172| Invitations 0|Online
S
L
1
1
1
1
L
1
Points 149 [Total 9929]| Ratings 0| Comments 149| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
P
C
L
P
C
P
C
L
P
C
P
C
P
C
Points 116 [Total 17288]| Ratings 0| Comments 116| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
P
C
P
C
1
L
P
C
L
P
C
P
C
P
C
P
C
Points 76 [Total 18607]| Ratings 0| Comments 76| Invitations 0|Online
S
1
L
1
L
P
P
L
Points 52 [Total 11298]| Ratings 0| Comments 52| Invitations 0|Online
S
1
L
L
Points 48 [Total 5172]| Ratings 0| Comments 48| Invitations 0|Online
S
Points 33 [Total 703]| Ratings 0| Comments 33| Invitations 0|Offline
S
P
C
L
P
L
1
Points 24 [Total 6081]| Ratings 1| Comments 14| Invitations 0|Offline
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2014 Purple Inc.