You have new items in your feed. Click to view.
Question and answer
The District Court ruled that the evidence did not meet the applicable "general acceptance" standard for the admission of expert testimony. Finally, the United States Supreme Court held that, under
the Federal Rules of Evidence, not Frye, that the evidence did not meet the standard for admitting expert testimony in a federal trial. Which case? (Points : 4) Miranda v Arizona William v. Florida Wells v. Daubert Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc.
Get an answer
Original conversation
User: The District Court ruled that the evidence did not meet the applicable "general acceptance" standard for the admission of expert testimony. Finally, the United States Supreme Court held that, under the Federal Rules of Evidence, not Frye, that the evidence did not meet the standard for admitting expert testimony in a federal trial. Which case? (Points : 4) Miranda v Arizona William v. Florida Wells v. Daubert Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Weegy: Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc.
Airyna|Points 80|

User: According to the courts any new evidence seized, resulting from unreasonably seized evidence, is also tainted and is not admissible in court. This is based on the: (Points : 4) Bad evidence doctrine Fruits of the poisonous tree doctrine Illegal seizure doctrine Unreasonable search doctrine

Weegy: Stolen evidence is not admissible because it could be tampered with once it was stolen.
Expert answered|Airyna|Points 80|

User: According to the courts any new evidence seized, resulting from unreasonably seized evidence, is also tainted and is not admissible in court. This is based on the: (Points : 4) Bad evidence doctrine Fruits of the poisonous tree doctrine Illegal seizure doctrine Unreasonable search doctrine

Weegy: Stolen evidence is not admissible because it could be tampered with once it was stolen.
Expert answered|Airyna|Points 80|



Question
Asked 7/4/2012 3:29:48 PM
0 Answers/Comments
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
In the case of _________, the Supreme Court ruled that in assessing the admissibility of new and unique scientific tests, the trial judge did not have to rely solely on concept of "general acceptance." (Points : 4) Michigan v. Tyler Frye v. United States Coppolino v. State Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals
Weegy: Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc. (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Updated 7/4/2012 3:47:36 PM
2 Answers/Comments
Good answer
Added 7/4/2012 3:34:21 PM
Flagged by debnjerry
Please don't add comments just to say good answer. Add something of value to the conversations but correcting wrong answers or adding additional information.
Added 7/4/2012 3:47:36 PM
The standard guideline for determining the judicial admissibility of scientific examination stemmed from which court ruling? (Points : 4) Mincy v. Arizona Kumbo Tire Co., Ltd. V. Carmichael Frye v. United States Coppolino v. State
Question
Not Answered
Updated 349 days ago|4/10/2016 2:14:53 PM
1 Answer/Comment
The standard guideline for determining the judicial admissibility of scientific examination stemmed from Frye v. United States.
Added 349 days ago|4/10/2016 2:14:53 PM
This answer has been confirmed as correct, not copied, and helpful.
Confirmed by Andrew. [4/11/2016 3:01:06 PM]
A(n) ___________ is a person who can demonstrate a particular skill or has knowledge in a trade or profession that will help the court determine the truth of the matter at issue. (Points : 4) Lay person Professional Witness Expert Witness Factual Witness
Question
Not Answered
Updated 12/31/2014 10:45:06 PM
1 Answer/Comment


An Expert Witness is a person who can demonstrate a particular skill or has knowledge in a trade or profession that will help the court determine the truth of the matter at issue.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expert_witness
Added 12/31/2014 10:45:06 PM
27,216,746 questions answered
Weegy Stuff
S
Points 594 [Total 695] Ratings 0 Comments 594 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 540 [Total 540] Ratings 0 Comments 540 Invitations 0 Offline
S
P
P
L
P
Points 221 [Total 1539] Ratings 1 Comments 211 Invitations 0 Offline
S
R
Points 205 [Total 305] Ratings 1 Comments 145 Invitations 5 Offline
S
P
P
L
P
P
Points 163 [Total 1615] Ratings 1 Comments 153 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 30 [Total 40] Ratings 3 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 14 [Total 14] Ratings 1 Comments 4 Invitations 0 Offline
S
P
P
Points 14 [Total 744] Ratings 0 Comments 14 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 13 [Total 13] Ratings 1 Comments 3 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 10 [Total 10] Ratings 0 Comments 0 Invitations 1 Offline
* Excludes moderators and previous
winners (Include)
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | © Purple Inc.