Notice: Payments for answers will end 4/10/2017. Click for more info.
You have new items in your feed. Click to view.
Question and answer
Q: The Federal Trade Commission was responsible for seeing that antitrust laws were enforced and that small businesses were protected.
A: right! With regard to multi-firm conduct, the Sherman Act addresses this by prohibiting "[e]very contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, [ in restraint of trade or commerce."[5] Conduct falls within the scope of this prohibition only if some form of agreement or concerted action can be proven. In considering multi-firm conduct, another distinction is also
fundamental: the distinction between conduct that is deemed anticompetitive per se and conduct that may be found to be anticompetitive after a reasoned analysis. There does not appear to be a precedent for per se condemnation of single-firm conduct. Monopoly power alone, without some act of wrongful exclusion or other legally cognizable anticompetitive conduct, is not prohibited. To the contrary, as the judge Learned Hand noted, "[t]he successful competitor, having been urged to compete, must not be turned on when he wins."[6] U.S. ] ]
Expert answered|rio8408|Points 180|
Question
Asked 6/7/2011 2:25:44 PM
0 Answers/Comments
Get an answer
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
The Supreme Court case that established the principle that the Court could declare acts of Congress unconstitutional was:
Question
Expert Answered
Updated 11/30/2016 1:34:12 PM
1 Answer/Comment
The Supreme Court case that established the principle that the Court could declare acts of Congress unconstitutional was Marbury v. Madison.
Added 11/30/2016 12:37:53 PM
This answer has been confirmed as correct and helpful.
Confirmed by Andrew. [11/30/2016 1:34:13 PM]
26,575,793 questions answered
Popular Conversations
6. Solve the equation. Show your work. Check your answer. 3x – 7 = 5x ...
Weegy: 3x – 7 = 5x + 19 , 3x - 5x = 19+7, -2x = 26, - x=26/2, x=-13
1/10/2018 8:46:51 AM| 3 Answers
9/11= /22
Weegy: Multiply the numerator of the first fraction by the denominator of the second fraction. Set this equal to the ...
1/10/2018 4:50:25 PM| 3 Answers
what does irrelevant mean
Weegy: An irrelevant cost is a cost that will not change as the result of a management decision. User: Find the ...
1/8/2018 8:16:56 AM| 2 Answers
Simplify this expression: 19 – (–8) – (–14) = ? A. 25 ...
Weegy: 19 ? (?8) ? (?14)
1/15/2018 10:29:20 PM| 2 Answers
Which of these lines contains a metaphor? A. You are like a ...
Weegy: The line that contains a metaphor is: User: Repeating consonant sounds, typically the last letter of a word, ...
1/8/2018 3:55:57 PM| 2 Answers
Cells are the basic of our bodies.
Weegy: Cells are the basic of our bodies. TRUE
1/10/2018 7:36:07 AM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
R
Points 513 [Total 805] Ratings 1 Comments 503 Invitations 0 Offline
S
L
Points 73 [Total 4524] Ratings 0 Comments 33 Invitations 4 Offline
S
P
L
P
Points 65 [Total 183] Ratings 0 Comments 65 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 17 [Total 17] Ratings 0 Comments 17 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 10 [Total 10] Ratings 0 Comments 0 Invitations 1 Offline
S
P
Points 5 [Total 44] Ratings 0 Comments 5 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 3 [Total 3] Ratings 0 Comments 3 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 2 [Total 2] Ratings 0 Comments 2 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 1 [Total 2] Ratings 0 Comments 1 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 1 [Total 1] Ratings 0 Comments 1 Invitations 0 Offline
* Excludes moderators and previous
winners (Include)
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | © Purple Inc.