You have new items in your feed. Click to view.
Question and answer
In the case ___________________, the Supreme Court created objective standards for questioning by police after a defendant has been taken into custody.
This question has not been answered. Can you answer it? Please add your answer below ...
Get an answer
Original conversation
User: In the case ___________________, the Supreme Court created objective standards for questioning by police after a defendant has been taken into custody.

User: In the case ___________________, the Supreme Court created objective standards for questioning by police after a defendant has been taken into custody.

Question
Asked 8/10/2013 12:21:46 PM
Updated 8/10/2013 12:27:15 PM
1 Answer/Comment
Flagged by alfred123
New answers
Rating
3
In the case MIRANDA V. ARIZONA, the Supreme Court created objective standards for questioning by police after a defendant has been taken into custody.



Added 8/10/2013 12:27:15 PM
This answer has been confirmed as correct, not copied, and helpful.
Confirmed by Andrew. [2/27/2015 1:37:32 AM], Rated good by Andrew.
Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
Describe the criteria for admissibility of scientific evidence as laid out in Frye v. United States.
Weegy: The criteria for admissibility of scientific evidence as laid out in Frye v. united states was the systolic blood pressure deception test also known today as the polygraph or lie detector test. User: What document offers an alternative to the Frye standard that some courts believe espouses a more flexible standard for admitting scientific evidence Weegy: Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, which held that Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence did not incorporate the Frye "general acceptance" test as a basis for assessing the admissibility of scientific expert testimony; General Electric Co. [ v. Joiner,[1] which held that an abuse-of-discretion standard of review was the proper standard for appellate courts to use in reviewing a trial court's decision of whether expert testimony should be admitted; Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael,[2] which held that the judge s gatekeeping function identified in Daubert applies to all expert testimony, including that which is non-scientific. Two of the most important appellate level opinions that clarify the standard include Judge Kozinski's opinion in Daubert on remand (Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 43 F.3d 1311 (9th Cir. 1995)), and Judge Becker's opinion in In re Paoli R.R. Yard PCB Litig., 35 F.3d 717 (3d Cir. 1994). Weisgram v Marley Co, 528 US 440 (2000) is also considered a significant case.[3] ] User: Two of the most important appellate level opinions that clarify the standard include Judge Kozinski's opinion in Daubert on remand (Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 43 F.3d 1311 (9th Cir. 1995)), and Judge Becker's opinion in In re Paoli R.R. Yard PCB Litig., 35 F.3d 717 (3d Cir. 1994). Weisgram v Marley Co, 528 US 440 (2000) is also considered a significant case. Weegy: What is your question? Thank you. (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 8/10/2013 12:01:35 PM
0 Answers/Comments
25,922,066 questions answered
Popular Conversations
Evaluate A 2 for A = -4
Weegy: -4^2 * 2^-1 = -16 * 1/2; = -16/2; = -8 User: equivalent to 0.36 User: What is the multiplicative inverse ...
8/22/2016 8:05:27 AM| 4 Answers
Simplify. 17 – 6 × 10 ÷ 2 + 12 A. 27.8 B. 59 C. 67 ...
Weegy: 17 ? 6 ? 10 ? 2 + 12 = 17 ( 6 x10) / 2 + 12 17 - 30 + 12 = -1 The answer is -1. User: Simplify.[2 × (10 ...
8/22/2016 6:25:58 AM| 2 Answers
Solve the inequality. 1/4c 32 D. c > 12
Weegy: B. CUser: Use the Associative Property of Addition to find the total of 1, 10, and 18 in two different ways. ...
8/22/2016 6:48:55 AM| 2 Answers
x = 6, y = -4, and z = -2. User: Find the value of 48 - 32 ÷ 4 · 2
Weegy: 48 - 32 ? 4 ? 2 = 32 48 - 8 ? 2 48 - 16 = 32 User: Simplify 8 - {x - (5 + x)} User: Simplify 6(x - 3) = -4 ...
8/22/2016 8:21:53 AM| 2 Answers
What clause of the Fourteenth Amendment helps ensure we are all ...
Weegy: The Snyder Act granted Native Americans full citizenship in 1924. User: In which landmark case did the ...
8/22/2016 8:38:16 AM| 2 Answers
Which list of events, documents, and governments shows the correct ...
Weegy: A confederation (also known as confederacy or league) is a union of political units for common action in ...
8/22/2016 9:54:11 AM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
Points 576 [Total 647] Ratings 4 Comments 536 Invitations 0 Offline
S
1
L
Points 403 [Total 1237] Ratings 2 Comments 383 Invitations 0 Online
S
L
P
P
P
P
Points 374 [Total 3629] Ratings 0 Comments 374 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 106 [Total 106] Ratings 0 Comments 106 Invitations 0 Offline
S
L
P
P
P
Points 46 [Total 3862] Ratings 0 Comments 46 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 40 [Total 45] Ratings 0 Comments 0 Invitations 4 Offline
S
Points 27 [Total 254] Ratings 0 Comments 27 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 11 [Total 11] Ratings 1 Comments 1 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 10 [Total 10] Ratings 1 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 10 [Total 10] Ratings 1 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Offline
* Excludes moderators and previous
winners (Include)
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | © Purple Inc.