User: One of the disadvantages of using truth tables is (Points : 1)
it is difficult to keep the lines straight
T's are easy to confuse with F's.
they grow exponentially and become too large for complex arguments.
they cannot distinguish strong inductive arguments from weak inductive arguments.

Weegy: They grow exponentially and become too large for complex arguments. tjdcet|Points 361|

User: The sentence "P ? Q" is best read as
(Points : 1)
If P then Q
If Q then P
P or Q
P if and only if Q

User: . If P is false, and Q is false, the truth-value of "P ?Q" is (Points : 1)
false.
true.
Cannot be determined.
All of the above.

Weegy: If P is false, and Q is false, the truth-value of "P ?Q" is False. jeifunk|Points 9671|

User: "P v Q" is best interpreted as (Points : 1)
P or Q but not both P and Q
P or Q or both P and Q
Not both P or Q
P if and only if Q

Weegy: 1. In the conditional "P ? Q," "Q is a (Points : 1) sufficient condition for Q. sufficient condition for P. necessary condition for P. necessary condition for Q. 2. [ The sentence "P ? Q" is best read as (Points : 1) If P then Q If Q then P P or Q P if and only if Q 3. The sentence "P ? Q" is read as (Points : 1) P or Q P and Q If P then Q Q if and only P 4. Truth tables can be used to examine (Points : 1) inductive arguments. deductive arguments. abductive arguments. All of the above 5. A sentence is said to be truth-functional if and only if (Points : 1) the sentence might be true. the truth-value of the sentence cannot be determined from the truth values of its components. the truth-value of the sentence is determined always to be false. the truth-value of the sentence can be determined from the truth values of its components. 6. Truth tables can determine which of the following? (Points : 1) If an argument is valid If an argument is sound If a sentence is valid All of the above 7. One of the disadvantages of using truth tables is (Points : 1) it is difficult to keep the lines straight T's are easy to confuse with F's. they grow exponentially and become too large for complex arguments. they cannot distinguish strong inductive arguments from weak inductive arguments. 8. "P v Q" is best interpreted as (Points : 1) P or Q but not both P and Q P or Q or both P and Q Not both P or Q P if and only if Q 9. If P is true, and Q is false, the truth-value of "P v Q" is (Points : 1) false. true. Cannot be determined All of the above 10. The truth table for a valid deductive argument will show (Points : 1) wherever the premises are true, the conclusion is true. that the premises are false. that some premises are true, some premises false. wherever the premises are true, the conclusion is false. ] Expert answered|ashgully69|Points 30|

Weegy: A conditional sentence with a false antecedent is always A. true. User: "P v Q" is best interpreted as (Points : 1)
P or Q but not both P and Q
P or Q or both P and Q
Not both P or Q
P if and only if Q Weegy: Context please (More)