Question and answer
what is the life cycle of the loblolly pine?
this study we analyzed the effects of silvicultural treatments on carbon (C) budgets in Pinus taeda L. (loblolly pine) plantations in the southeastern United States. [ We developed a hybrid model that integrated a widely used growth and yield model for loblolly pine with published allometric and biometric equations to simulate in situ C pools. The model used current values of forest product
conversion efficiencies and forest product decay rates to calculate ex situ C pools. Using the model to evaluate the effects of silvicultural management systems on C sequestration over a 200 year simulation period, we concluded that site productivity (site quality), which can be altered by silviculture and genetic improvement, was the major factor controlling stand C density. On low productivity sites, average net C stocks were about 35% lower than in stands with the default average site quality; in contrast, on high quality sites, C stocks were about 38% greater than average productivity stands. If woody products were incorporated into the accounting, thinning was C positive because of the larger positive effects on ex situ C storage, rather than smaller reductions on in situ C storage. The use of biological rotation age (18 years) was not suitable for C sequestration, and extended rotation ages were found to increase stand C stock density. Stands with an 18-year-rotation length had 7% lower net C density than stands with a 22-year-rotation length; stands with a 35-year-rotation length had only 4% more C than stands harvested at age 22 years. The C sequestered in woody products was an important pool of C storage, accounting for ~34% of the average net C stock. Changes in decomposition rate, associated with possible environmental changes resulting from global climate change, affected C storage capacity of the forest. When decay rate was reduced to 10% or increased to 20%, the C stock in the dead pool (forest floor and coarse woody debris) was reduced about 11.8 MgC·ha-1 or increased about 13.3 MgC·ha-1, respectively, compared to the average decay rate of 15%. ]
Expert answered|recstudio|Points 81|
Question
Asked 10/25/2011 8:27:14 AM
0 Answers/Comments
Get an answer
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
describe the life cycle of the loblolly pine
Weegy: Pinus taeda (loblolly pine) is the foundation of the lumber and pulp industry in the Southeast and is found widely planted. Pinus taeda was first described as a species in 1753. [ The scientific name means ìpine used for torches.î Common names include bull pine, oldfield pine, shortleaf pine, Arkansas pine, North Carolina pine, Georgia pine, resin pine, mudhole pine, rosemary pine, frankincense pine, and lob pine. The accepted common ... (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 10/25/2011 8:21:44 AM
0 Answers/Comments
why did the development of the seed greatly improve the ability of angiosperms and conifers to survive and succeed?
Weegy: Please see check the link: (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 10/25/2011 8:33:05 AM
0 Answers/Comments
Describe the neutral theory of kimura?
Weegy: The neutral theory of molecular evolution states that the vast majority of evolutionary changes at the molecular level are caused by random drift of selectively neutral mutants (not affecting fitness).[1] The theory was introduced by Motoo Kimura in [ the late 1960s and early 1970s, and although it was received by some as an argument against Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection, Kimura maintained (and most evolutionary ... (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 10/27/2011 5:14:21 AM
0 Answers/Comments
Describe the neutral theory of kimura?
Weegy: Kimura's neutral theory, first presented in 1968, challenged the notion that natural selection was the sole directive force in evolution. [ Arguing that mutations and random drift account for variations at the level of DNA and amino acids, Kimura advanced a theory of evolutionary change that was strongly challenged at first and that eventually earned the respect and interest of evolutionary biologists throughout the world. This volume ... (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 10/27/2011 5:09:52 AM
0 Answers/Comments
what difference exist between selectionist and naturalistic theories regarding the selection process?
Weegy: Natural selection is the nonrandom process by which biologic traits become more or less common in a population as a function of differential reproduction of their bearers. It is a key mechanism of evolution. [ In contrast, the selectionist theory is the view that evolution or genetic variation occurs chiefly as a result of natural selection. ] (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 10/27/2011 5:33:49 AM
0 Answers/Comments
17,191,188 questions answered
Popular Conversations
Consider this quote: "In each of these historical instances . . . ...
Weegy: D. it stands for the omission of only a single word. User: Which of the following statements correctly ...
9/1/2014 8:30:28 AM| 2 Answers
The invasion of this region temporarily halted the fighting between ...
Weegy: The invasion of A.Korea halted the the fighting between the KMT and CPC. User: The letters DMZ stand for ...
9/1/2014 3:12:20 PM| 2 Answers
what is a complex sentence
Weegy: User: what is a simple sentence Weegy: User: what is a compound sentence Weegy: A compound sentence ...
9/1/2014 5:04:39 PM| 2 Answers
Every set of three points is coplanar.
9/1/2014 7:59:14 PM| 2 Answers
Chelsea Reynolds
9/1/2014 12:21:17 AM| 1 Answers
1. What is team structure?
9/1/2014 12:29:27 AM| 1 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
1
L
Points 136 [Total 6669]| Ratings 0| Comments 136| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
C
P
C
1
L
L
Points 126 [Total 16065]| Ratings 0| Comments 126| Invitations 0|Offline
S
R
L
1
1
P
C
1
P
1
1
L
P
C
P
C
1
P
C
L
P
C
1
P
C
P
C
Points 96 [Total 24496]| Ratings 0| Comments 96| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
1
1
1
1
L
1
Points 66 [Total 9846]| Ratings 0| Comments 66| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
P
C
L
P
C
P
C
L
P
C
P
C
P
C
Points 54 [Total 17226]| Ratings 0| Comments 54| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
P
C
P
C
1
L
P
C
L
P
C
P
C
P
C
P
C
Points 48 [Total 18579]| Ratings 0| Comments 48| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
1
L
P
P
L
Points 23 [Total 11269]| Ratings 0| Comments 23| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 20 [Total 20]| Ratings 0| Comments 0| Invitations 2|Offline
S
Points 18 [Total 688]| Ratings 0| Comments 18| Invitations 0|Offline
S
P
C
L
P
L
1
Points 15 [Total 6072]| Ratings 1| Comments 5| Invitations 0|Offline
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2014 Purple Inc.