Question and answer
2. How can the concept of a national identity both unite and divide people?
In modern times multiculturalism is instituted from the top down as an elitist ruling class tool used to play one or more racial or ethnic groups against another. [ The ensuing cultural melee serves the political designs, economic goals and power needs of elitist rulers and their sponsors. This technique was developed by Marxist ideologues who used multiculturalism in Russia to divide and
conquer resistance to the institution of a communist state. The end result of their successful takeover was the murder of thirty million humans in the Soviet Union alone. Many more elsewhere. ]
Get an answer
Original conversation
User: 2. How can the concept of a national identity both unite and divide people?





Weegy: In modern times multiculturalism is instituted from the top down as an elitist ruling class tool used to play one or more racial or ethnic groups against another. [ The ensuing cultural melee serves the political designs, economic goals and power needs of elitist rulers and their sponsors. This technique was developed by Marxist ideologues who used multiculturalism in Russia to divide and conquer resistance to the institution of a communist state. The end result of their successful takeover was the murder of thirty million humans in the Soviet Union alone. Many more elsewhere. ]
Expert answered|MrG|Points 685|

User: 2. How can the concept of a national identity both unite and divide people?

Weegy: A strong sense of national identity can unite people by making a group of individuals feel like part of a cohesive whole. [ For example, after the terrorists attacks on 9/11, this country experienced the strongest sense of national identity I have personally ever witnessed. Every car had a flag attached to the antenna, every shop had a collection jar to help fellow Americans, and so on. A strong sense of national identity helped American heal from our wounds. We were all proud to be Americans. However, all of this good feeling had a downside. People who were NOT Americans, especially Arabs, were immediately suspect, an "Us-versus-Them" mentality quickly set in. Mosques were vandalized, threats were made, and a sense of foreboding and prejudice against anyone who looks to be Middle Eastern continues to this day. ]
Expert answered|Fanboy|Points 2251|

Question
Asked 8/18/2012 9:12:59 PM
0 Answers/Comments
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
In your own opinion, Is it wrong to kill someone in self – defense?
Weegy: 1) I think that you have to separate the legal and the ethical aspect. Or maybe there could also be a religious aspect. [ There are some legal aspects of self defense, and if the deadly force was applied in a situation without extreme danger, or if the degree of violence was not comparable to the threat, you could have a problem. On the other side, you have to see for yourself how your ethics support this act of yours. Did you use a firearm? Why did you have a firearm in the first place? Do you still have one? 2) The ethical problem could possibly be tackled with the support of psychological or religious counseling. Read more: If you kill someone in self defense, even just that they simply will not leave you to live your life, is it a mortal crime that should justly haunt you forever? Will you deserve just as bad? | Answerbag ] (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 8/11/2012 6:40:48 PM
0 Answers/Comments
\Is it wrong to kill someone in self – defense?
Weegy: Try to think of it this way. This mugger tried to rob and kill you. So you killed that person to keep them from killing you. But that's not all you did. Since that person is no longer around, they can't rob, beat or kill anyone else. [ So yes, I think God will understand. Besides if you look at the Old Hebrew text of the Old Testament, the word should have been translated as 'Thou shalt not murder', not 'Thou shalt not kill'. While I agree that it is preferable to subdue someone with non-lethal force, sometimes you don't have a choice. In that case, the person who attempted to use violence against you is at fault because had they not chosen to be violent, you would not have had to defend yourself. ] (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 8/11/2012 7:42:09 PM
0 Answers/Comments
2. Should we try to keep people alive at all cost, no matter what their physical or mental condition?
Weegy: yes , specially your love ones.. thanks you for using weegy.. (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 8/11/2012 7:43:08 PM
0 Answers/Comments
Should we try to keep people alive at all cost, no matter what their physical or mental condition?
Weegy: Ethical dilemmas about end-of-life care are not uncommon in the Intensive Care Unit, so I’m told. [ For this reason, it is of the utmost importance that upon arrival to the ICU, the medical team establishes (and carefully documents) the patient’s “code status.” That is, whether they are full code (they want all measures taken to preserve their life), DNR (do not resuscitate with CPR), or DNI (do not intubate using a ventilator to assist breathing). If the patient can communicate and is deemed to have decision making capacity, they inform the ICU team of their code status. If not, the patient’s health care proxy tells us what the patient would have wanted. ] User: Should we try to keep people alive at all cost, no matter what their physical or mental condition? (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 8/11/2012 9:00:16 PM
0 Answers/Comments
Now suppose that you go to your bank and write a check on your account payable to cash for $500. The teller gives you the cash without asking you to indorse the check. After you leave, the teller slips the check into his pocket. Later, the teller delivers it (without an endorsement) to his friend Carol in payment for a gambling debt. Carol takes your check to her bank, indorses it, and deposits the money. Discuss whether Carol is a holder in due course.
Weegy: The scenario you describe wouldn't even happen. Since the teller wouldn't have your check in their drawer at the end of the night when they go to count their drawer, it would come up short. [ I also find it impossible to believe the teller didn't pass the check back to you for ENdorsement. I think you are leaving some parts out of your story here. ] (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 8/11/2012 10:33:11 PM
0 Answers/Comments
18,460,531 questions answered
Popular Conversations
Weegy Stuff
S
L
1
L
P
C
1
P
C
1
L
P
C
1
Points 2939 [Total 14649]| Ratings 11| Comments 2829| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 1480 [Total 3766]| Ratings 0| Comments 1480| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 883 [Total 915]| Ratings 1| Comments 873| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
1
L
P
P
L
P
Points 786 [Total 14160]| Ratings 0| Comments 786| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 777 [Total 1298]| Ratings 6| Comments 717| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
L
Points 273 [Total 6667]| Ratings 0| Comments 273| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 163 [Total 1459]| Ratings 3| Comments 133| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 138 [Total 138]| Ratings 1| Comments 128| Invitations 0|Online
S
Points 50 [Total 50]| Ratings 0| Comments 0| Invitations 5|Offline
S
Points 46 [Total 46]| Ratings 3| Comments 6| Invitations 1|Offline
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2014 Purple Inc.