Question and answer
Question not found.
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
A strongly supported claim in science should be regarded as (Points : 1) correct, but something that can always be revised. necessarily true. meaningless but fun. correct, and never needing re
Weegy: A strongly supported claim in science should be regarded as (Points : 1) correct, but something that can always be revised. (More)
Question
Everything Else|No Subcategories|Expert Answered
Asked 6/6/2012 3:40:51 PM
0 Answers/Comments
To support a scientific hypothesis, one might (Points : 1) gather data that confirms the hypothesis. look for ways of refuting the hypothesis. Both A and B None of the above
Weegy: gather data that confirms the hypothesis (More)
Question
All Categories|No Subcategories|Expert Answered
Asked 6/6/2012 4:13:18 PM
0 Answers/Comments
French philosopher René Descartes tried to show that (Points : 1) Gruyere made the best cheese sandwiches. all philosophical arguments were inductive arguments. radical skepticism was the best approach to philosophy. at least one thing could be shown to be absolutely true.
Weegy: French philosopher Ren? Descartes tried to show that radical skepticism was the best approach to philosophy. (More)
Question
All Categories|No Subcategories|
Updated 2/24/2013 9:10:01 PM
1 Answer/Comment
French philosopher Rene Descartes tried to show that there might not be an all-loving God orchestrating things from a celestial perch. Perhaps there was an Evil Demon who had brainwashed us into believing that all we see and sense is reality, but is really an illusion devised by this diabolical entity. This is called the Demon Hypothesis.
Added 2/24/2013 9:10:01 PM
Provide a scientific hypothesis and explain how one might go about testing it, either by confirming the hypothesis or using Karl Popper's strategy of disconfirmation. Discuss which of these two strategies is better and why.
Weegy: You could just replicate Galileo Galilei in order to check the hypothesis that the weight of the object doesn't affect fall time. [ It shouldn't be much difference between the two strategies, [ but you might use Popper's modus tollens as the other would just be accruing empirical evidence that you're right - you can never prove anything empirically, but you can disprove something empirically. ] ] (More)
Question
All Categories|No Subcategories|Expert Answered
Asked 6/8/2012 9:14:58 AM
0 Answers/Comments
Home | Contact | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2013 Purple Inc.
Ask a question. Get an instant answer from an advanced search engine and a team of really smart live experts. Always free.
Popular Conversations
The Cultural Revolution was a plan to a. make Chinese culture popular ...
Weegy: The Cultural Revolution was a plan to replace ancient culture with a socialist culture. As well as removing ...
4/15/2014 2:15:34 PM| 13 Answers
1. Simplify the expression. 22 + (32 – 42) User: 3. Evaluate the ...
Weegy: 4y + 5 = ? 31 4y = -31 - 5 4y = -36 y = -36/4 y = -9 User: Solve the equation. Check your answer. 3x – 7 = ...
4/15/2014 4:20:45 PM| 4 Answers
What is the slope of the line that passes through the points (-2, ...
Weegy: (-3)^-2 = 1/(-3)^2 = 1/9 User: What is the slope of the line that passes through the points (3, -2) and (9, ...
4/15/2014 6:30:47 AM| 3 Answers
what is anthropology
Weegy: Anthropology is the study of humankind, past and present, that draws and builds upon knowledge from social and ...
4/16/2014 3:13:10 AM| 3 Answers
All of the following were achievements of the Sumerian culture ...
Weegy: All of the following were achievements of the Sumerian culture except the Great Pyramid.
4/15/2014 6:46:30 AM| 2 Answers
children
Weegy: what is your question about chil? User: children women the king men played the most vital musical role in ...
4/15/2014 12:48:26 PM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
P
C
P
C
1
L
P
C
Points 1255 [Total 9136]| Ratings 0| Comments 1255| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
P
C
L
P
C
Points 1176 [Total 6563]| Ratings 0| Comments 1176| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
1
L
P
Points 383 [Total 7060]| Ratings 1| Comments 373| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 333 [Total 2780]| Ratings 2| Comments 303| Invitations 1|Online
S
Points 137 [Total 553]| Ratings 0| Comments 137| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
Points 136 [Total 466]| Ratings 3| Comments 106| Invitations 0|Offline
S
R
Points 95 [Total 207]| Ratings 5| Comments 35| Invitations 1|Offline
S
Points 92 [Total 736]| Ratings 1| Comments 82| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 83 [Total 83]| Ratings 4| Comments 23| Invitations 2|Online
S
P
C
L
P
Points 76 [Total 3921]| Ratings 0| Comments 76| Invitations 0|Offline