Question and answer
Question not found
Ask a question
Not a good answer? Get an answer now. (Free)
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
What percentage of cases are dropped because of the exclusionary rule? (Points : 3) approximately 8% less than 10% more than 12% fewer than 2%
Weegy: The primary purpose of the Exclusionary Rule "is to deter future unlawful police conduct and thereby effectuate the guarantee of the Fourth Amendment against unreasonable searches and seizures." (United States v. Calandra (1974) 414 U.S. [ [ 338 [38 L.Ed.2nd 561]; Illinois v. Krull (1987) 480 U.S. 340 [94 L.Ed.2nd 364]; People v. Robles (2000) 23 Cal.4th 789, 799.) "?[T]he "prime purpose" of the [exclusionary] rule, if not the sole one, "is to deter future unlawful police conduct." [Citations]' (Citations)" (Italics added; People v. Sanders (2003) 31 Cal.4th 318, 324.) It is also the purpose of the Fourth Amendment to "safeguard the privacy and security of individuals against arbitrary invasions by government officials." (Camera v. Municipal Court (1967) 387 U.S. 523, 528 [18 L.Ed.2nd 930, 935].) An otherwise lawful seizure can violate the Fourth Amendment if it is executed in an unreasonable manner. (United States v. Alverez-Tejeda (9th Cir. 2007, citing United States v. Jacobsen (1984) 466 U.S. 109, 124 [80 L.Ed.2d 85].) Evidence illegally obtained by private persons, acting in a private capacity, is not subject to the Exclusionary Rule. (See Krauss v. Superior Court (1971) 5 Cal.3rd 418, 421; People v. North (1981) 29 Cal.3rd 509, 514; Jones v. Kmart Corp. (1998) 17 Cal.App.4th 329, 332.) Even a peace officer, when off-duty and acting in a private capacity, may be found to have acted as a private citizen. (See People v. Wachter (1976) 58 Cal.App.3rd 911, 920, 922.) However, the Exclusionary Rule is not intended to prevent all police misconduct or as a remedy for all police errors. "The use of the exclusionary rule is an exceptional remedy typically reserved for violations of constitutional rights." (United States v. Smith (9th Cir. 1999) 196 F.3rd 1034, 1040.) Not all courts are in agreement that such a remedy is reserved exclusively for constitutional violations. (See discussion in United States v. Lombera-Camorlinga (9th Cir. 2000) 206 ... (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 6/18/2012 3:58:14 PM
0 Answers/Comments
18,399,493 questions answered
Popular Conversations
A product is
11/20/2014 6:12:42 PM| 8 Answers
Which equation below is a direct variation? A. 1/6x=y B. x + 2 = ...
Weegy: An example of a quadratic equation is y = x^2 - 5 User: The value of y varies directly with x, and y = 4 ...
11/20/2014 7:27:37 AM| 4 Answers
0.0872
Weegy: Scientific notation of 0.0872 is 8.720 10^-2. User: 0.48 Weegy: what you need to know my friend? User: ...
11/20/2014 6:57:30 AM| 2 Answers
Which equation below is a direct variation? A. B. x + 2 = y C. y ...
Weegy: The equation of the line that passes through the points ( 2, 2) and (0, 5)is B. y = 3/2x + 5 User: The value ...
11/20/2014 7:40:11 AM| 2 Answers
x^3-4x^2+4x-16
Weegy: x^3 + 4x^2 - 4x - 16.. Solution: - > (x^3 + 4x^2) - (4x + 16) - > x^2(x + 4) - 4(x + 4) - > (x^2 - 4)(x + ...
11/20/2014 8:21:10 AM| 2 Answers
The legs of a right triangle have lengths of 4 and 5 units. Find the ...
Weegy: The length of the hypotenuse of a right triangle whose legs are 3 and sqrt 2 is sqrt [3^2 + (sqrt 2)^2] = sqrt ...
11/20/2014 9:03:43 AM| 2 Answers
Is the ordered pair (0,5) a solution of the system of linear ...
Weegy: yes, the ordered pair (0,5) a solution of the system of linear equations: x + y = 5 -5x + 2y = 10. 0 + 5 = 5, ...
11/20/2014 9:19:10 AM| 2 Answers
Find the slope and y-intercept of the line. y = –2x + 8 (Points : ...
Weegy: y = mx + b where m is the slope of the line and b is the y intercept ... equation of the line with slope m 1. y ...
11/20/2014 10:00:11 AM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
1
L
P
C
1
P
C
1
L
P
C
1
Points 2178 [Total 13889]| Ratings 10| Comments 2078| Invitations 0|Online
S
L
Points 1165 [Total 3451]| Ratings 0| Comments 1165| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
1
L
P
P
L
P
Points 644 [Total 14018]| Ratings 0| Comments 644| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 640 [Total 1161]| Ratings 6| Comments 580| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 352 [Total 384]| Ratings 1| Comments 342| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
L
Points 211 [Total 6605]| Ratings 0| Comments 211| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 143 [Total 1439]| Ratings 3| Comments 113| Invitations 0|Online
S
Points 50 [Total 50]| Ratings 0| Comments 0| Invitations 5|Offline
S
Points 46 [Total 46]| Ratings 3| Comments 6| Invitations 1|Offline
S
Points 40 [Total 40]| Ratings 4| Comments 0| Invitations 0|Online
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2014 Purple Inc.