Question and answer
Question not found
Ask a question
Not a good answer? Get an answer now. (Free)
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
What percentage of cases are dropped because of the exclusionary rule? (Points : 3) approximately 8% less than 10% more than 12% fewer than 2%
Weegy: The primary purpose of the Exclusionary Rule "is to deter future unlawful police conduct and thereby effectuate the guarantee of the Fourth Amendment against unreasonable searches and seizures." (United States v. Calandra (1974) 414 U.S. [ [ 338 [38 L.Ed.2nd 561]; Illinois v. Krull (1987) 480 U.S. 340 [94 L.Ed.2nd 364]; People v. Robles (2000) 23 Cal.4th 789, 799.) "?[T]he "prime purpose" of the [exclusionary] rule, if not the sole one, "is to deter future unlawful police conduct." [Citations]' (Citations)" (Italics added; People v. Sanders (2003) 31 Cal.4th 318, 324.) It is also the purpose of the Fourth Amendment to "safeguard the privacy and security of individuals against arbitrary invasions by government officials." (Camera v. Municipal Court (1967) 387 U.S. 523, 528 [18 L.Ed.2nd 930, 935].) An otherwise lawful seizure can violate the Fourth Amendment if it is executed in an unreasonable manner. (United States v. Alverez-Tejeda (9th Cir. 2007, citing United States v. Jacobsen (1984) 466 U.S. 109, 124 [80 L.Ed.2d 85].) Evidence illegally obtained by private persons, acting in a private capacity, is not subject to the Exclusionary Rule. (See Krauss v. Superior Court (1971) 5 Cal.3rd 418, 421; People v. North (1981) 29 Cal.3rd 509, 514; Jones v. Kmart Corp. (1998) 17 Cal.App.4th 329, 332.) Even a peace officer, when off-duty and acting in a private capacity, may be found to have acted as a private citizen. (See People v. Wachter (1976) 58 Cal.App.3rd 911, 920, 922.) However, the Exclusionary Rule is not intended to prevent all police misconduct or as a remedy for all police errors. "The use of the exclusionary rule is an exceptional remedy typically reserved for violations of constitutional rights." (United States v. Smith (9th Cir. 1999) 196 F.3rd 1034, 1040.) Not all courts are in agreement that such a remedy is reserved exclusively for constitutional violations. (See discussion in United States v. Lombera-Camorlinga (9th Cir. 2000) 206 ... (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 6/18/2012 3:58:14 PM
0 Answers/Comments
17,874,281 questions answered
Popular Conversations
Choose the product. -7p3(4p2 + 3p - 1)
Weegy: -7p3(4p2 3p - 1) = 7p3 - 84p6. Source: User: Find the quotient. 42j4k2 ÷ (-3j3k) Weegy: = 42j k /- 3j k) = ...
10/19/2014 5:43:50 PM| 3 Answers
Describe the key differences between managing and leading.
Weegy: ]
10/19/2014 5:51:01 PM| 3 Answers
Find the sum and choose the correct answer. 2n3 + 4n2 - 7 and -n3 + ...
Weegy: (2 n^3+4 n^2-7)+(-n^3+8 n-9) your answer is n^3+4 n^2+8 n-16 User: Select the correct difference. -3z7 - ...
10/19/2014 5:41:21 PM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
1
1
1
1
L
1
L
Points 2061 [Total 14436]| Ratings 0| Comments 2061| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
1
L
P
C
1
P
C
1
L
Points 1375 [Total 10856]| Ratings 3| Comments 1345| Invitations 0|Online
S
1
L
1
L
P
P
L
Points 704 [Total 12933]| Ratings 0| Comments 704| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 423 [Total 1822]| Ratings 0| Comments 423| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
L
Points 418 [Total 6212]| Ratings 3| Comments 388| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 330 [Total 330]| Ratings 0| Comments 300| Invitations 3|Offline
S
Points 241 [Total 242]| Ratings 2| Comments 221| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 125 [Total 125]| Ratings 1| Comments 115| Invitations 0|Offline
S
P
C
L
P
L
1
Points 43 [Total 6277]| Ratings 0| Comments 43| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 27 [Total 27]| Ratings 0| Comments 27| Invitations 0|Offline
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2014 Purple Inc.