Question and answer
Question not found
Ask a question
Not a good answer? Get an answer now. (Free)
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
What percentage of cases are dropped because of the exclusionary rule? (Points : 3) approximately 8% less than 10% more than 12% fewer than 2%
Weegy: The primary purpose of the Exclusionary Rule "is to deter future unlawful police conduct and thereby effectuate the guarantee of the Fourth Amendment against unreasonable searches and seizures." (United States v. Calandra (1974) 414 U.S. [ [ 338 [38 L.Ed.2nd 561]; Illinois v. Krull (1987) 480 U.S. 340 [94 L.Ed.2nd 364]; People v. Robles (2000) 23 Cal.4th 789, 799.) "?[T]he "prime purpose" of the [exclusionary] rule, if not the sole one, "is to deter future unlawful police conduct." [Citations]' (Citations)" (Italics added; People v. Sanders (2003) 31 Cal.4th 318, 324.) It is also the purpose of the Fourth Amendment to "safeguard the privacy and security of individuals against arbitrary invasions by government officials." (Camera v. Municipal Court (1967) 387 U.S. 523, 528 [18 L.Ed.2nd 930, 935].) An otherwise lawful seizure can violate the Fourth Amendment if it is executed in an unreasonable manner. (United States v. Alverez-Tejeda (9th Cir. 2007, citing United States v. Jacobsen (1984) 466 U.S. 109, 124 [80 L.Ed.2d 85].) Evidence illegally obtained by private persons, acting in a private capacity, is not subject to the Exclusionary Rule. (See Krauss v. Superior Court (1971) 5 Cal.3rd 418, 421; People v. North (1981) 29 Cal.3rd 509, 514; Jones v. Kmart Corp. (1998) 17 Cal.App.4th 329, 332.) Even a peace officer, when off-duty and acting in a private capacity, may be found to have acted as a private citizen. (See People v. Wachter (1976) 58 Cal.App.3rd 911, 920, 922.) However, the Exclusionary Rule is not intended to prevent all police misconduct or as a remedy for all police errors. "The use of the exclusionary rule is an exceptional remedy typically reserved for violations of constitutional rights." (United States v. Smith (9th Cir. 1999) 196 F.3rd 1034, 1040.) Not all courts are in agreement that such a remedy is reserved exclusively for constitutional violations. (See discussion in United States v. Lombera-Camorlinga (9th Cir. 2000) 206 ... (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 6/18/2012 3:58:14 PM
0 Answers/Comments
20,457,197 questions answered
Popular Conversations
Solve 2x^2 + x - 6 = 0 User: Solve |4x - 8| User: Solve the ...
Weegy: 2x + 1 User: Solve |x| > 5 User: Solve 7x - 4 = 5x + 15 for x.
4/17/2015 9:42:20 AM| 3 Answers
Which of the following statements uses the commutative property of ...
Weegy: C.2 + (3 + 4) = 2 + (4 + 3) User: Simplify (12ab)(3t). Weegy: Answer is 36abt User: Simplify (4x) · mn · 15 ...
4/17/2015 10:33:35 AM| 3 Answers
5x 2 y and 7x y 2 are like terms. True False
Weegy: 7x + 5x = 12x User: Simplify -10x - 2x + 3x. -9x 9x 11x Weegy: -10x - 2x + 3x = -9x User: Simplify 5(x ...
4/17/2015 10:43:33 AM| 3 Answers
Solve for x. 4x + 3 < 9
4/17/2015 10:16:12 AM| 2 Answers
Judging and evaluating advertisements requires critical thinking ...
Weegy: truth in advertising laws ensure the accuracy of information in advertisements User: what is an inference
4/17/2015 10:42:02 AM| 2 Answers
what is an antecedent
Weegy: In grammar, an antecedent is an expression (word, phrase, clause, etc.) that gives its meaning to a proform ...
4/17/2015 12:45:24 PM| 2 Answers
Which two superpowers engaged in an arms race during the cold war as ...
Weegy: Which two superpowers engaged in an arms race during the cold war as they competed with each other to acquire ...
4/17/2015 3:21:30 PM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
Points 712 [Total 2289]| Ratings 1| Comments 702| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 605 [Total 1172]| Ratings 2| Comments 585| Invitations 0|Offline
S
P
C
L
P
L
1
P
P
1
Points 217 [Total 8094]| Ratings 2| Comments 197| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 164 [Total 164]| Ratings 0| Comments 164| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
1
R
Points 101 [Total 1173]| Ratings 1| Comments 91| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 101 [Total 3704]| Ratings 0| Comments 101| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
L
Points 72 [Total 8066]| Ratings 0| Comments 72| Invitations 0|Online
S
Points 47 [Total 47]| Ratings 1| Comments 37| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
1
Points 43 [Total 3484]| Ratings 1| Comments 33| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 22 [Total 22]| Ratings 0| Comments 22| Invitations 0|Offline
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2015 Purple Inc.