Question and answer
Question not found
Ask a question
Not a good answer? Get an answer now. (Free)
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
What percentage of cases are dropped because of the exclusionary rule? (Points : 3) approximately 8% less than 10% more than 12% fewer than 2%
Weegy: The primary purpose of the Exclusionary Rule "is to deter future unlawful police conduct and thereby effectuate the guarantee of the Fourth Amendment against unreasonable searches and seizures." (United States v. Calandra (1974) 414 U.S. [ [ 338 [38 L.Ed.2nd 561]; Illinois v. Krull (1987) 480 U.S. 340 [94 L.Ed.2nd 364]; People v. Robles (2000) 23 Cal.4th 789, 799.) "?[T]he "prime purpose" of the [exclusionary] rule, if not the sole one, "is to deter future unlawful police conduct." [Citations]' (Citations)" (Italics added; People v. Sanders (2003) 31 Cal.4th 318, 324.) It is also the purpose of the Fourth Amendment to "safeguard the privacy and security of individuals against arbitrary invasions by government officials." (Camera v. Municipal Court (1967) 387 U.S. 523, 528 [18 L.Ed.2nd 930, 935].) An otherwise lawful seizure can violate the Fourth Amendment if it is executed in an unreasonable manner. (United States v. Alverez-Tejeda (9th Cir. 2007, citing United States v. Jacobsen (1984) 466 U.S. 109, 124 [80 L.Ed.2d 85].) Evidence illegally obtained by private persons, acting in a private capacity, is not subject to the Exclusionary Rule. (See Krauss v. Superior Court (1971) 5 Cal.3rd 418, 421; People v. North (1981) 29 Cal.3rd 509, 514; Jones v. Kmart Corp. (1998) 17 Cal.App.4th 329, 332.) Even a peace officer, when off-duty and acting in a private capacity, may be found to have acted as a private citizen. (See People v. Wachter (1976) 58 Cal.App.3rd 911, 920, 922.) However, the Exclusionary Rule is not intended to prevent all police misconduct or as a remedy for all police errors. "The use of the exclusionary rule is an exceptional remedy typically reserved for violations of constitutional rights." (United States v. Smith (9th Cir. 1999) 196 F.3rd 1034, 1040.) Not all courts are in agreement that such a remedy is reserved exclusively for constitutional violations. (See discussion in United States v. Lombera-Camorlinga (9th Cir. 2000) 206 ... (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 6/18/2012 3:58:14 PM
0 Answers/Comments
19,255,549 questions answered
Popular Conversations
Simplify 3a · 3b ÷ 3c ÷ 3d.
Weegy: Please restate your question. User: Simplify. n 6 · n 5 ÷ n 4 · n 3 ÷ n 2 · n User: Find the quotient. 4 r ...
1/30/2015 7:49:30 AM| 3 Answers
Find the product. (3p 4)3 · (p 2)7
Weegy: The product of (3p^4)^3 * (p^2)^7 is =27p^26 Solution: = 3^3 (p^4)^3 * (p^2)^7 = 27 p^12 * p^14 =27p^26 ...
1/30/2015 7:43:35 AM| 2 Answers
5x + 2y = 5 3x - y = 14 Which of the following equations is not a ...
Weegy: The best answer is B.11y = -55 User: Write the standard form of the line that passes through the given ...
1/30/2015 9:54:50 AM| 2 Answers
even times a number minus the number is -48. Find the number. the ...
Weegy: A.the number is -8 User: The quotient of a number and 2 is the same as the difference of the number doubled ...
1/30/2015 11:08:55 AM| 2 Answers
Simplify the following expression. (x 2)^3
Weegy: May i know what the question is? User: (x + 2)^3 Weegy: The answer is x^2
1/30/2015 2:55:16 PM| 2 Answers
67+8
Weegy: Hi! Sorry but I'm not the previous agent that you were having conversations with. What do you want to know about ...
1/30/2015 7:56:16 PM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
Points 2094 [Total 2115]| Ratings 0| Comments 2094| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
P
L
P
Points 1473 [Total 6750]| Ratings 0| Comments 1473| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
1
L
P
P
L
P
P
Points 767 [Total 15778]| Ratings 1| Comments 757| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 438 [Total 1119]| Ratings 2| Comments 418| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
L
Points 346 [Total 7046]| Ratings 1| Comments 336| Invitations 0|Online
S
Points 121 [Total 136]| Ratings 1| Comments 111| Invitations 0|Offline
S
P
C
L
P
L
1
Points 92 [Total 6680]| Ratings 1| Comments 82| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 85 [Total 1646]| Ratings 0| Comments 85| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 63 [Total 445]| Ratings 0| Comments 63| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 57 [Total 58]| Ratings 0| Comments 57| Invitations 0|Offline
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2014 Purple Inc.