Question and answer
Someone is selling candy and posts a sign in the break room saying anyone may take the candy if they put money in the jar. James took candy without paying. What is the most logical reason for James
to take the candy? a James forgot to put money in the jar.b. James has known the person selling the candy for a long time.c. Someone put extra money in the can.Jd. \ames steals things when he can get away with it.
a James forgot to put money in the jar.
Expert answered|rhey22787|Points 242|
Question
Asked 8/5/2012 5:59:11 PM
0 Answers/Comments
Get an answer
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
can you give your own opinion and show proof of the policy
Weegy: What type of policy are you talking about? User: The Police Commissioner is under pressure to solve a murder and offers $100,000 for information leading to an arrest and conviction of the culprit. Mary suspects her neighbor, Phoebe, is the guilty party and calls Bob, a friend and police officer, with her suspicions. When Bob visits Phoebe, she unsuccessfully resists arrest, though Bob is severely injured. Phoebe is ultimately convicted of the murder and assaulting Bob. Mary insists all the reward money belongs to her. Is she right? What is the policy consideration behind the relevant rule? Do you agree with the policy? Why or why not? (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 7/30/2012 8:12:06 AM
0 Answers/Comments
(2) Do you agree with the policy consideration behind the relevant rule? That any promises made by any parties must be supported by legally sufficient and bargained for consideration that is something of value received or promised to convince a person to make a deal. WHY/WHY NOT?
Weegy: Policy considerations may become relevant to the making of The policy consideration behind the relevant rule is; if a judicial decision when the decision cannot be made by reference to established rules, [ [ whether grounded in precedent or even in statute. The Court will then consider the values and policy arguments that are relevant to the articulation of the potential rule (or principle). The Court must make an evaluation of them as a preliminary to articulating the rule to be applied in the instant case. The rule will have an application that extends beyond the parties to the case. Just how far it will extend depends upon its terms, its nature, and subject matter. ] ] (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 7/30/2012 9:08:24 AM
0 Answers/Comments
(2) Do you agree with the policy? That any promises made by any parties must be supported by legally sufficient and bargained for consideration that is something of value received or promised to convince a person to make a deal. WHY/WHY NOT?
Weegy: I somewhat agree. If a certain party makes a promise, it should be evaluated for its legality before it is put into effect. (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 7/30/2012 9:11:47 AM
0 Answers/Comments
Do you agree with this policy?The policy behind the relevant rule is that the police cannot legally offer a reward because they are public service employees. The reward money would have to come from somewhere other than the police department or police commissioner. Why/why not?
Weegy: Agree, doing it by yourself is much better than giving the task to others. User: Do you agree with this policy?The policy behind the relevant rule is that the police cannot legally offer a reward because they are public service employees. The reward money would have to come from somewhere other than the police department or police commissioner. Why/why not? Weegy: Agree, doing it by yourself is much better than giving the task to others. (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 7/30/2012 9:16:34 AM
0 Answers/Comments
Do you agree with this policy?The policy behind the relevant rule is that the police cannot legally offer a reward because they are public service employees. The reward money would have to come from somewhere other than the police department or police commissioner. Why/why not?
Weegy: i don't agree with this policy its not fair to reward someone from sources other than official police department . [ because it's not legal so i dont agree with this policy! they can make request to thier senior officials to reward them but from other external sources its unfair ] (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 7/30/2012 9:35:21 AM
0 Answers/Comments
25,343,732 questions answered
Popular Conversations
8!
Weegy: hello what is your question? User: 0!=0 Weegy: The answer is zero. The property is identity property of ...
5/26/2016 2:58:30 PM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
Points 662 [Total 662] Ratings 10 Comments 542 Invitations 2 Offline
S
Points 649 [Total 649] Ratings 12 Comments 529 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 592 [Total 592] Ratings 0 Comments 592 Invitations 0 Offline
S
1
L
L
P
R
P
L
P
P
R
Points 287 [Total 12539] Ratings 2 Comments 267 Invitations 0 Offline
S
L
P
P
P
Points 166 [Total 3543] Ratings 0 Comments 166 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 38 [Total 107] Ratings 0 Comments 38 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 12 [Total 12] Ratings 1 Comments 2 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 10 [Total 10] Ratings 1 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 4 [Total 4] Ratings 0 Comments 4 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 3 [Total 3] Ratings 0 Comments 3 Invitations 0 Offline
* Excludes moderators and previous
winners (Include)
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | © Purple Inc.