Question and answer
Someone is selling candy and posts a sign in the break room saying anyone may take the candy if they put money in the jar. James took candy without paying. What is the most logical reason for James
to take the candy? a James forgot to put money in the jar.b. James has known the person selling the candy for a long time.c. Someone put extra money in the can.Jd. \ames steals things when he can get away with it.
a James forgot to put money in the jar.
Expert answered|rhey22787|Points 242|
Question
Asked 8/5/2012 5:59:11 PM
0 Answers/Comments
Get an answer
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
The Police Commissioner is under pressure to solve a murder and offers $100,000 for information leading to an arrest and conviction of the culprit. Mary suspects her neighbor, Phoebe, is the guilty party and calls Bob, a friend and police officer, with her suspicions. When Bob visits Phoebe, she unsuccessfully resists arrest, though Bob is severely injured. Phoebe is ultimately convicted of the murder and assaulting Bob. Mary insists all the reward money belongs to her. Is she right?
Weegy: She gave information leading to the arrest and conviction of the subject. [ She gets the reward (btw no police commissioner is going to offer any reward, let alone $100,000) The policy is that the police do not, and actually cannot legally, offer a reward in most states. The reward and moneys posted have to be from private businesses or individuals. City, taxpayers, money cannot be used. It is also against the law for officers to receive the benefit of rewards. They are public servants, not PI's or bounty hunters. Of course I agree, It is only fair and it is truly the only way to get information from a posted reward. If you do not hold up your end of the reward bargain then rewards will become useless in helping to apprehend and convict offenders. ] (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 7/30/2012 8:08:06 AM
0 Answers/Comments
can you give your own opinion and show proof of the policy
Weegy: What type of policy are you talking about? User: The Police Commissioner is under pressure to solve a murder and offers $100,000 for information leading to an arrest and conviction of the culprit. Mary suspects her neighbor, Phoebe, is the guilty party and calls Bob, a friend and police officer, with her suspicions. When Bob visits Phoebe, she unsuccessfully resists arrest, though Bob is severely injured. Phoebe is ultimately convicted of the murder and assaulting Bob. Mary insists all the reward money belongs to her. Is she right? What is the policy consideration behind the relevant rule? Do you agree with the policy? Why or why not? (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 7/30/2012 8:12:06 AM
0 Answers/Comments
(2) Do you agree with the policy consideration behind the relevant rule? That any promises made by any parties must be supported by legally sufficient and bargained for consideration that is something of value received or promised to convince a person to make a deal. WHY/WHY NOT?
Weegy: Policy considerations may become relevant to the making of The policy consideration behind the relevant rule is; if a judicial decision when the decision cannot be made by reference to established rules, [ [ whether grounded in precedent or even in statute. The Court will then consider the values and policy arguments that are relevant to the articulation of the potential rule (or principle). The Court must make an evaluation of them as a preliminary to articulating the rule to be applied in the instant case. The rule will have an application that extends beyond the parties to the case. Just how far it will extend depends upon its terms, its nature, and subject matter. ] ] (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 7/30/2012 9:08:24 AM
0 Answers/Comments
Do you agree with this policy?The policy behind the relevant rule is that the police cannot legally offer a reward because they are public service employees. The reward money would have to come from somewhere other than the police department or police commissioner. Why/why not?
Weegy: i don't agree with this policy its not fair to reward someone from sources other than official police department . [ because it's not legal so i dont agree with this policy! they can make request to thier senior officials to reward them but from other external sources its unfair ] (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 7/30/2012 9:35:21 AM
0 Answers/Comments
17,621,038 questions answered
Popular Conversations
antonym of prevented ...
10/1/2014 9:05:38 AM| 3 Answers
Simplify the expression. (3x - 1)(x^2 + 2x - 4) User: 3x+2(x+5) ...
Weegy: 1+tan^2(x) = sec^2(x) 1+cot^2(x) = csc^2(x) (1+tan^2(x)) / (1+cot^2(x) = sec^2(x) / csc^2(x) = ...
10/1/2014 1:46:20 AM| 3 Answers
The pressure of ocean water increases as depth increases. User: The ...
Weegy: It originates in the Gulf of Mexico and, as the Florida Current, passes through the Straits of Florida and then ...
9/30/2014 6:27:02 AM| 3 Answers
The densest ocean water is generally found a. in the surface ...
Weegy: A. in the surface zone User: In which zone is ocean temperature most affected by the weather? a. transition ...
9/30/2014 6:07:25 AM| 3 Answers
What is planter flexion?
10/1/2014 1:37:43 PM| 2 Answers
what is weegy
Weegy: Weegy also has a montly point contest. [ The experts with the most points per month wins extra money! I haven't ...
10/1/2014 12:19:15 PM| 2 Answers
Who is Harry Bailly?
10/1/2014 11:54:52 AM| 2 Answers
What is an overdraft?
10/1/2014 11:23:22 AM| 2 Answers
People who have a common cultural background and a common sense of ...
Weegy: People who have a common cultural background and a common sense of identity is a people of race. User: The ...
10/1/2014 10:50:53 AM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
1
L
P
C
1
P
C
1
Points 92 [Total 9574]| Ratings 0| Comments 92| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
L
Points 24 [Total 5818]| Ratings 0| Comments 24| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
1
L
P
P
L
Points 17 [Total 12246]| Ratings 0| Comments 17| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
1
Points 10 [Total 3354]| Ratings 1| Comments 0| Invitations 0|Offline
S
P
C
L
P
L
1
Points 6 [Total 6240]| Ratings 0| Comments 6| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 2 [Total 37]| Ratings 0| Comments 2| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 1 [Total 214]| Ratings 0| Comments 1| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
Points 1 [Total 3077]| Ratings 0| Comments 1| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
1
1
1
1
L
1
L
Points 1 [Total 12376]| Ratings 0| Comments 1| Invitations 0|Offline
Points 0 [Total 0]| Ratings 0| Comments 0| Invitations 0|Offline
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2014 Purple Inc.