Question and answer
Someone is selling candy and posts a sign in the break room saying anyone may take the candy if they put money in the jar. James took candy without paying. What is the most logical reason for James
to take the candy? a James forgot to put money in the jar.b. James has known the person selling the candy for a long time.c. Someone put extra money in the can.Jd. \ames steals things when he can get away with it.
a James forgot to put money in the jar.
Expert answered|rhey22787|Points 242|
Question
Asked 8/5/2012 5:59:11 PM
0 Answers/Comments
Get an answer
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
The Police Commissioner is under pressure to solve a murder and offers $100,000 for information leading to an arrest and conviction of the culprit. Mary suspects her neighbor, Phoebe, is the guilty party and calls Bob, a friend and police officer, with her suspicions. When Bob visits Phoebe, she unsuccessfully resists arrest, though Bob is severely injured. Phoebe is ultimately convicted of the murder and assaulting Bob. Mary insists all the reward money belongs to her. Is she right?
Weegy: She gave information leading to the arrest and conviction of the subject. [ She gets the reward (btw no police commissioner is going to offer any reward, let alone $100,000) The policy is that the police do not, and actually cannot legally, offer a reward in most states. The reward and moneys posted have to be from private businesses or individuals. City, taxpayers, money cannot be used. It is also against the law for officers to receive the benefit of rewards. They are public servants, not PI's or bounty hunters. Of course I agree, It is only fair and it is truly the only way to get information from a posted reward. If you do not hold up your end of the reward bargain then rewards will become useless in helping to apprehend and convict offenders. ] (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 7/30/2012 8:08:06 AM
0 Answers/Comments
can you give your own opinion and show proof of the policy
Weegy: What type of policy are you talking about? User: The Police Commissioner is under pressure to solve a murder and offers $100,000 for information leading to an arrest and conviction of the culprit. Mary suspects her neighbor, Phoebe, is the guilty party and calls Bob, a friend and police officer, with her suspicions. When Bob visits Phoebe, she unsuccessfully resists arrest, though Bob is severely injured. Phoebe is ultimately convicted of the murder and assaulting Bob. Mary insists all the reward money belongs to her. Is she right? What is the policy consideration behind the relevant rule? Do you agree with the policy? Why or why not? (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 7/30/2012 8:12:06 AM
0 Answers/Comments
The Police Commissioner is under pressure to solve a murder and offers $100,000 for information leading to an arrest and conviction of the culprit. Mary suspects her neighbor, Phoebe, is the guilty party and calls Bob, a friend and police officer, with her suspicions. When Bob visits Phoebe, she unsuccessfully resists arrest, though Bob is severely injured. Phoebe is ultimately convicted of the murder and assaulting Bob. Mary insists all the reward money belongs to her. Is she right? What is ...
Weegy: She gave information leading to the arrest and conviction of the subject. [ [ She gets the reward (btw no police commissioner is going to offer any reward, let alone $100,000) The policy is that the police do not, and actually cannot legally, offer a reward in most states. The reward and moneys posted have to be from private businesses or individuals. City, taxpayers, money cannot be used. It is also against the law for officers to receive the benefit of rewards. They are public servants, not PI's or bounty hunters. Of course I agree, It is only fair and it is truly the only way to get information from a posted reward. If you do not hold up your end of the reward bargain then rewards will become useless in helping to apprehend and convict offenders SUnshine all Day :) ] User: can you show proof of the policy Weegy: I cannot, Thanks SUnshine all Day :) (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 7/30/2012 8:15:33 AM
0 Answers/Comments
(2) Do you agree with the policy consideration behind the relevant rule? That any promises made by any parties must be supported by legally sufficient and bargained for consideration that is something of value received or promised to convince a person to make a deal. WHY/WHY NOT?
Weegy: Policy considerations may become relevant to the making of The policy consideration behind the relevant rule is; if a judicial decision when the decision cannot be made by reference to established rules, [ [ whether grounded in precedent or even in statute. The Court will then consider the values and policy arguments that are relevant to the articulation of the potential rule (or principle). The Court must make an evaluation of them as a preliminary to articulating the rule to be applied in the instant case. The rule will have an application that extends beyond the parties to the case. Just how far it will extend depends upon its terms, its nature, and subject matter. ] ] (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 7/30/2012 9:08:24 AM
0 Answers/Comments
(2) Do you agree with the policy? That any promises made by any parties must be supported by legally sufficient and bargained for consideration that is something of value received or promised to convince a person to make a deal. WHY/WHY NOT?
Weegy: I somewhat agree. If a certain party makes a promise, it should be evaluated for its legality before it is put into effect. (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 7/30/2012 9:11:47 AM
0 Answers/Comments
24,992,099 questions answered
Popular Conversations
In December 1997, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate ...
Weegy: your answer is A. slow the global energy crisis by encouraging nations to find new sources of nonrenewable ...
5/1/2016 12:33:13 PM| 2 Answers
A synonym is a word that has the opposite meaning as itself.
Weegy: A synonym is a word that has the opposite meaning as itself. FALSE. User: That is incorrect. Please try ...
5/1/2016 2:43:48 AM| 1 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
Points 85 [Total 85] Ratings 4 Comments 45 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 64 [Total 64] Ratings 1 Comments 44 Invitations 1 Offline
S
1
L
L
P
R
P
L
P
Points 43 [Total 12295] Ratings 0 Comments 43 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 18 [Total 87] Ratings 0 Comments 18 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 10 [Total 10] Ratings 1 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 5 [Total 150] Ratings 0 Comments 5 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 1 [Total 1] Ratings 0 Comments 1 Invitations 0 Offline
Points 0 [Total 0] Ratings 0 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Offline
Points 0 [Total 0] Ratings 0 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 0 [Total 0] Ratings 0 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Offline
* Excludes moderators and previous
winners (Include)
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | © Purple Inc.