Question and answer
Provide 2 examples that support your views on whether news reporters should be able to keep their sources of information confidential and Explain how your examples support your view?
Most states do not give absolute privilege to reporters, especially where criminal trials are concerned. [ A reporter may not be protected by the privilege when asked to reveal confidential sources to a grand jury or in a criminal trial when the criminal defendant’s Sixth Amendment rights to a fair trial are at risk. State shield law protection applies only in state court or state proceedings,
and not in federal court or against a federal grand jury subpoena. No federal law currently protects journalists from being forced to disclose their confidential sources, but Congress is considering a bill (the Free Flow of Information Act) that would create a federal shield law. New York Times reporter Judith Miller's life changed dramatically on July 6, 2005 when a federal judge ordered her jailed for her continued refusal to give evidence in a grand jury investigation into the disclosure of the identity of a covert CIA operative. In Branzburg versus Hayes, the Supreme Court decided the First Amendment does not give news reporters a privilege to keep their sources secret from the government. - ]
Expert answered|cmmyg|Points 67|
Question
Asked 5/12/2013 5:20:58 PM
0 Answers/Comments
Get an answer
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
What is the definition for showup identification?
Weegy: A show-up usually occurs immediately or shortly after a crime has occurred. [ If law enforcement personnel see a person who they suspect is the perpetrator of a very recent crime, the officers may apprehend the suspect and bring him back to the scene of the crime and show him to witnesses, or the officers may take the suspect to a police station and bring the witnesses to the station. This method of identification of a criminal suspect is a legitimate tool of law enforcement and is encumbered by few judicial restraints. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that an unnecessarily suggestive identification procedure is a violation of due process (Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293, 87 S. Ct. 1967, 18 L. Ed. 2d 1199 [1967]). Evidence from such an identification should be excluded from a trial of the suspect. A show-up is inherently suggestive because police generally do not present to a witness a person who they believe is innocent of wrongdoing. Nevertheless, show-ups do not violate due process if they are conducted near the scene of the crime and shortly after the crime was committed. ] (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 5/11/2013 3:14:47 PM
0 Answers/Comments
20,576,466 questions answered
Popular Conversations
Which of the following best describes ...
Weegy: B. The ability to be hammered thin best describes malleability. User: Which of the following is always true ...
4/25/2015 5:51:30 AM| 2 Answers
what is 1 - 100
Weegy: 4(3)^2 - 10(2) = 4(9) - 20; = 36 - 20; = 16 User: what is 1 + 1 Weegy: "What" is used with a noun in ...
4/25/2015 11:26:02 AM| 2 Answers
Which word in the sentence functions as an objective complement? The ...
Weegy: An objective complement is a noun, adjective, or pronoun serving as a complement to a verb and qualifying its ...
4/25/2015 3:38:07 PM| 2 Answers
-12 + 7 + (-1) = User: 19 + (-27) =
4/25/2015 5:32:17 PM| 2 Answers
Which of the following is the least important factor of a personal ...
Weegy: The time of day physical activity will be performed is the least important factor of a personal fitness program. ...
4/25/2015 12:05:36 AM| 1 Answers
Nutritional labels list only healthy nutrients.
4/25/2015 12:12:38 AM| 1 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
Points 712 [Total 2289]| Ratings 1| Comments 702| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 633 [Total 1200]| Ratings 2| Comments 613| Invitations 0|Offline
S
P
C
L
P
L
1
P
P
1
Points 425 [Total 8302]| Ratings 3| Comments 395| Invitations 0|Online
S
Points 418 [Total 418]| Ratings 0| Comments 418| Invitations 0|Online
S
Points 210 [Total 210]| Ratings 1| Comments 200| Invitations 0|Offline
S
Points 197 [Total 197]| Ratings 2| Comments 177| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
L
Points 172 [Total 8166]| Ratings 0| Comments 172| Invitations 0|Online
S
L
1
R
Points 128 [Total 1200]| Ratings 1| Comments 118| Invitations 0|Offline
S
L
Points 124 [Total 3727]| Ratings 0| Comments 124| Invitations 0|Offline
S
1
L
1
Points 43 [Total 3484]| Ratings 1| Comments 33| Invitations 0|Offline
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | Social | ©2015 Purple Inc.