Notice: Payments for answers will end 4/10/2017. Click for more info.
You have new items in your feed. Click to view.
Question and answer
Q: how might individuals and the united states work together to reduce prejudice and increase appreciation for diversity?
A: In criminology, psychology, and sociology, the contact hypothesis has been described as one of the best ways to improve relations among groups that are experiencing conflict.[1][2] Gordon W. [ Allport (1954) is often credited with the development of the Contact Hypothesis, also known as Intergroup Contact Theory. The premise of Allport's theory states that under appropriate conditions
interpersonal contact is one of the most effective ways to reduce prejudice between majority and minority group members.[3] If one has the opportunity to communicate with others, they are able to understand and appreciate different points of views involving their way of life. As a result of new appreciation and understanding, prejudice should diminish.[4] Issues of stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination are commonly occurring issues between rival groups. Allport's proposal was that properly managed contact between the groups should reduce these problems and lead to better interactions. In order for this to occur, these 4 criteria must be present: Equal Status, both groups taken into an equal status relationship, Common Goals, both groups work on a problem/task and share this as a common goal, sometimes called a superordinate goal, Acquaintance Potential, the opportunity of group members to get to know each other as friends, and not merely as actors playing out social roles or as representatives of their social groups; the familiarity between group members involving the task or situation at hand Support of authorities, law or customs, some authority that both groups acknowledge and define social norms that support the contact and interactions between the groups and members. The reduction of prejudice through intergroup contact is best explained as the reconceptualization of group categories. Gordon Allport (1954) claims that prejudice is a direct result of generalizations and oversimplifications made about an entire group of people based on incomplete or mistaken information. ]
Expert answered|shanietotz|Points 10|
Question
Asked 11/15/2012 9:07:11 PM
0 Answers/Comments
Get an answer
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
26,651,025 questions answered
Popular Conversations
Suppose the U.S. can produce cars for a lower opportunity cost than ...
Weegy: Suppose the U.S. can produce cars for a lower opportunity cost than Japan while Japan has a comparative ...
2/13/2018 7:30:37 PM| 4 Answers
Simplify and solve this equation for q: 3q + 5 + 2q – 5 = 65. ...
Weegy: 3q + 5 + 2q - 5 = 65 User: Solve the following inequality: 38 4 B. x 28 Weegy: 38 User: Use an ...
2/19/2018 12:26:32 AM| 3 Answers
What's the simplified form of 2x + 3 x + 5? A. x 8 B. ...
Weegy: (2x^2)(3x^2) = 6x4 User: Simplify this expression: 13 + (–12) – (–5) = ? A. –6 B. 6 C. –30 ...
2/12/2018 11:53:02 PM| 3 Answers
Solve this equation: 80 = 3y + 2y + 4 + 1. A. y = 1/5 B. ...
Weegy: 80 = 3y + 2y + 4 + 1 80 = 5y + 5 80 - 5 = 5y -5y = -75 y = 15 User: Solve the inequality: 12p + 7 > 139 ...
2/14/2018 2:20:46 PM| 3 Answers
Solve the equation: 12y = 132. A. y = 11 B. y = 144 ...
Weegy: 12y = 132 User: Solve this equation: 2s + s + 12 = 132. A. s = 40 B. s = –30 C. s = 9 D. ...
2/14/2018 2:32:47 PM| 3 Answers
Identify the coefficient of 17xy3z12
Weegy: The coefficient of 17xy^3z^12 is 17. User: Solve this inequality: 3p – 16 Weegy: 3p ? 16 User: Identify ...
2/20/2018 5:15:23 PM| 2 Answers
Complete the following equation using , or = 7 ___24 4 A. ...
Weegy: 7 > 24/4 User: Edgar Anderson earns $300 a week plus a 15% commission only on sales he makes after his first ...
2/16/2018 3:58:09 AM| 2 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
L
Points 390 [Total 393] Ratings 12 Comments 240 Invitations 3 Online
S
Points 89 [Total 89] Ratings 0 Comments 19 Invitations 7 Offline
S
P
L
P
P
Points 55 [Total 248] Ratings 0 Comments 55 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 50 [Total 50] Ratings 5 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Offline
S
1
L
L
P
R
P
L
P
P
R
Points 47 [Total 12658] Ratings 0 Comments 47 Invitations 0 Offline
S
P
Points 41 [Total 85] Ratings 1 Comments 31 Invitations 0 Offline
S
P
Points 13 [Total 30] Ratings 0 Comments 13 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 11 [Total 11] Ratings 1 Comments 1 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 10 [Total 10] Ratings 0 Comments 0 Invitations 1 Offline
S
Points 10 [Total 11] Ratings 1 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Offline
* Excludes moderators and previous
winners (Include)
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | © Purple Inc.